Changes to support asic name change from marvell to marvell-prestera #14377
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
9 tasks
11 tasks
|
@yxieca Can you pls help review and approve ? |
|
@krismarvell I thought we discussed, Marvell platform will remain named marvell, the new platform can have a post fix to distinguish. This is to make sure that we have continuity with the old branches. |
|
Raised below pull request to support asic name change from marvell to marvell-prestera |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Adding the changes to support chip name change from marvell to marvell-prestera
Summary:
The chip name for marvell is changed to marvell-prestera
Same need to be modified in sonic-mgmt where we do conditional checks for different scripts.
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
Any platform specific information?
sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#19829
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?