-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deterministic rake swig
#136
Comments
Sounds good!
|
OK! I can work on this. |
Nice! Can you base it on |
jacobvosmaer
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 6, 2024
This is working towards deterministic `rake swig` (see #136).
jacobvosmaer
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 6, 2024
This is working towards deterministic `rake swig` (see #136).
jacobvosmaer
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 7, 2024
This is working towards deterministic `rake swig` (see #136).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When I run
rake swig
on my development machine it is easy to get unwanted changes in the_wrap.cxx
files. It would be nice ifrake swig
was deterministic. It makes life easier for contributors, and we could also check in CI that the generated files checked into Git are "correct".Some things we would have to fix:
sed
afterswig
to fix the@SWIG
comments to use a fixed path (we can useswig -swiglib
to find the string that needs to be replaced)rake swig
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: