Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pt] Improved APs in rule ID:GENERAL_NUMBER_AGREEMENT_ERRORS #11076

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2024

Conversation

marcoagpinto
Copy link
Member

@marcoagpinto marcoagpinto commented Dec 2, 2024

Improved antipatterns.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new antipattern for the use of "nós" in Portuguese grammar rules, enhancing contextual understanding.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Modified an existing antipattern to improve matching by including "em" in its regular expression.
  • Refactor

    • Removed redundant antipattern related to "nós," streamlining grammar rules.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new antipattern related to the usage of "nós" in Portuguese grammar rules within the grammar.xml file. It includes specific token definitions and contextual examples, while also modifying an existing antipattern to expand its matching criteria. Additionally, a previous antipattern addressing "nós" has been removed, streamlining the grammar rules by eliminating redundancy and enhancing the overall structure.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/.../grammar.xml - New antipattern added for "nós".
- Existing antipattern modified to include "em".
- Antipattern addressing "nós" removed.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jaumeortola: Suggested as a reviewer for this pull request.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/pt/grammar.xml (1)

4334-4342: LGTM! Consider adding more diverse examples.

The antipattern for "nós" is well-structured with comprehensive postag patterns that correctly handle various grammatical contexts. The examples provided are valid and illustrative.

Consider adding examples that demonstrate:

  • Negative contexts (e.g., "não")
  • Question forms
  • Different verb tenses
    This would help ensure the antipattern handles a broader range of valid use cases.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d0fee7 and c347017.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/pt/grammar.xml (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/pt/grammar.xml (1)

4361-4367: LGTM! Verify the coverage of language references.

The addition of 'em' to the regex pattern is appropriate and well-demonstrated by the new example. This change improves the coverage of different ways to reference languages in Portuguese.

Let's verify if there are any other common language reference patterns we should consider:

✅ Verification successful

Let me run another search to specifically look for language reference patterns in Portuguese:


LGTM! The language reference patterns are well covered.

The codebase analysis reveals comprehensive coverage of language references in Portuguese, including:

  • Prepositions: "em", "do", "no", "de" with languages
  • Common use cases:
    • Translation contexts (e.g., "do inglês", "em inglês")
    • Language learning (e.g., "em Português", "de Francês")
    • Etymology (e.g., "do grego", "do latim")
    • Academic contexts (e.g., "prova de Inglês", "professor de português")

The addition of 'em' to the pattern aligns with these established patterns and examples in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other language reference patterns in the codebase
rg -i "(?:em|do|no|de)\s+\w+\s+(?:significa|tradução|idioma)" \
    --type xml \
    --glob "**/*.xml" \
    -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 24512


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for language references in Portuguese rules
rg -i "(?:em|do|no|de)\s+(?:inglês|português|francês|alemão|espanhol|italiano|latim|grego)" \
    --type xml \
    --glob "**/pt/**/grammar.xml" \
    -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 33179

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant