-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add taxonomy #408
Add taxonomy #408
Conversation
Remove .DS_Store
Issue #6 - Remove generated doc from repository.
Introducing values
For a first version, let's do without subnodes. We can always add them later if we find out that they are needed.
… to make them future-proof. In the original version, requests were implemented as a `struct` with `pub` fields. That's going to cause code breakage if we decide to add or rework fields in the future (e.g. to restore subnodes). This patch replaces the public fields with a proper API that may be used to create and combine requests.
Better deserialization error messages
Implementing Parse::from_str_at
Add WebPushNotify type for webpush adapter
Better deserialization error messages
…of 'typ' - matching the deserialization format.
When serialized, extension now sends 'type' instead of 'typ' - matchi…
Adding ChannelKind::ExecuteEveryInterval, ExecuteAfterDelay
Switching Color from RGBA to HSV
* Tags persistence
Local compilation: https://travis-ci.org/fxbox/foxbox/jobs/124767230#L824 r? @Yoric |
What will happen to Taxonomy's WIP branches (e.g. fxbox/deprecated-taxonomy#104 ) when we merge this? |
We'll need to migrate them manually. @JohanLorenzo has promised to help :) |
Yes, we'll have to manually create the new branches/PRs. A couple of ways I see:
|
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | |||
target/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't paid attention for other repos, but is this file necessary?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch. That particular file is not necessary as .gitignore
at the root of the repo already takes care of target/
and Cargo.lock
. I added an extra commit to clean it up
r=me |
No description provided.