-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 793
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Force aligned param length <master> [7841] #1059
Force aligned param length <master> [7841] #1059
Conversation
@@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ constexpr DestinationOrderQosPolicyKind BY_RECEPTION_TIMESTAMP_DESTINATIONORDER_ | |||
constexpr DestinationOrderQosPolicyKind BY_SOURCE_TIMESTAMP_DESTINATIONORDER_QOS = | |||
DestinationOrderQosPolicyKind::BY_SOURCE_TIMESTAMP_DESTINATIONORDER_QOS; | |||
using DestinationOrderQosPolicy = fastdds::dds::DestinationOrderQosPolicy; | |||
using UserDataQosPolicy = fastdds::dds::UserDataQosPolicy; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why treat UserDataQosPolicy different from the rest of QosPolicy classes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The linker complained on non-defined UserDataQosPolicy::addToCDRMessage
. This class is only being used inside other classes (ProxyData and DDS QoS), so it is almost impossible for a user to have been using it. In fact, as part of the DDS PSM changes we are making, this has already been done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
This is a forward port of #1047 + #1056