-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Destination redshift: Use new interfaces #39008
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
This was referenced Jun 4, 2024
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_test_kotlin_conversion
branch
from
June 4, 2024 21:00
7c1a4ed
to
f345c43
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
from
June 4, 2024 21:01
49a3808
to
f6685f3
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_test_kotlin_conversion
branch
from
June 5, 2024 15:53
f345c43
to
2864bef
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
from
June 5, 2024 15:53
f6685f3
to
fd745ce
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_test_kotlin_conversion
branch
from
June 5, 2024 16:03
2864bef
to
d0495a9
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
from
June 5, 2024 16:03
fd745ce
to
5090604
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
from
June 5, 2024 21:07
5090604
to
1b81b3e
Compare
edgao
changed the base branch from
edgao/redshift_test_kotlin_conversion
to
edgao/redshift_remove_encryption_option
June 5, 2024 21:07
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 6, 2024 23:50
fb13354
to
edf17e1
Compare
edgao
changed the base branch from
edgao/redshift_remove_encryption_option
to
edgao/jdbc_gen_id_support
June 6, 2024 23:50
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
from
June 6, 2024 23:50
edf17e1
to
95fddcf
Compare
edgao
changed the base branch from
edgao/jdbc_gen_id_support
to
edgao/redshift_remove_encryption_option
June 6, 2024 23:50
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_remove_encryption_option
branch
from
June 7, 2024 00:01
d0273c2
to
3d0e7d3
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 7, 2024 00:06
a28e631
to
c972810
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_remove_encryption_option
branch
from
June 7, 2024 15:15
026cf75
to
2e369fc
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
from
June 7, 2024 15:15
c972810
to
f1c00f7
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_remove_encryption_option
branch
from
June 7, 2024 16:33
2e369fc
to
f7a341e
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 7, 2024 21:35
9511622
to
c8dfb6c
Compare
gisripa
reviewed
Jun 11, 2024
...in/io/airbyte/integrations/destination/redshift/operation/RedshiftStagingStorageOperation.kt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
stephane-airbyte
approved these changes
Jun 21, 2024
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
from
June 25, 2024 17:56
1c20def
to
1750b55
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_remove_encryption_option
branch
from
June 25, 2024 22:58
4cb52bc
to
b7434d0
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
from
June 25, 2024 22:58
1750b55
to
2f51fd9
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_remove_encryption_option
branch
from
June 26, 2024 16:33
b7434d0
to
cd415ea
Compare
Base automatically changed from
edgao/redshift_remove_encryption_option
to
master
June 26, 2024 16:54
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
3 times, most recently
from
June 26, 2024 20:56
ea7ac8e
to
b22f4d9
Compare
octavia-squidington-iii
added
the
area/documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
label
Jun 26, 2024
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
from
June 26, 2024 22:34
b22f4d9
to
4d34b0a
Compare
edgao
force-pushed
the
edgao/redshift_new_interfaces
branch
from
June 26, 2024 23:58
4d34b0a
to
0254987
Compare
This was referenced Jul 2, 2024
xiaohansong
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
area/connectors
Connector related issues
area/documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
connectors/destination/redshift
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I intend to ship this during assemble (in spite of the large diff, it should actually be a relatively low-risk change; I'll run some tests in the perf test workspace just for extra confidence)
general PR structure:
super.anything()
check
now runs a mini-sync (similar to what destiantion-snowflake is doing in Destination Snowflake: Adapting to new connector interfaces #38658). Again, we maybe should extract this to CDK.getMigrations
now includes RedshiftDV2Migration, so we don't need to handle it separately in getSerializedConsumercloses https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte-internal-issues/issues/8351