Convert Library to use integration settings (PP-11)

[jonathangreen]

Description

Convert libraries to store their settings in a json column on the libraries table, rather then using configuration settings. See jira ticket PP-11.

Note: This PR is based on #1276 so that one should go in first.

Motivation and Context

This is part of the larger CM Config Settings epic: PP-4

How Has This Been Tested?

• Running unit tests

Checklist

• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• All new and existing tests passed.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 99.31% and project coverage change: -0.04 ⚠️

Comparison is base (3f936ce) 89.95% compared to head (54bed22) 89.92%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1281      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.95%   89.92%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         197      197              
  Lines       29149    28982     -167     
  Branches     6695     6631      -64     
==========================================
- Hits        26220    26061     -159     
+ Misses       1903     1900       -3     
+ Partials     1026     1021       -5     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
api/admin/dashboard_stats.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
api/admin/problem_details.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
api/admin/validator.py	89.61% <ø> (-8.37%)	⬇️
core/entrypoint.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
core/model/constants.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
core/model/licensing.py	87.48% <ø> (ø)
core/model/listeners.py	94.31% <ø> (-2.35%)	⬇️
scripts.py	84.97% <50.00%> (-0.06%)	⬇️
core/configuration/library.py	99.11% <99.11%> (ø)
api/admin/controller/library_settings.py	96.85% <100.00%> (+4.48%)	⬆️
... and 9 more

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[RishiDiwanTT]

I can't really find anything at fault here. Just wondering why are the settings added to the Library model as opposed to using the IntegrationLibraryConfiguration Model without a parent.

[jonathangreen]

I decided to add the settings directly to the library table because I didn't want to overload the IntegrationLibraryConfiguration table too much. Since these settings are not really configurations for an integration, they didn't seem like they fit in the IntegrationLibraryConfiguration table.