Graphrag docs

[shreyaspimpalgaonkar]

Important

Add Graphrag documentation and enhance CLI and API for knowledge graph operations, including new options and parameters for entity and triple retrieval.

• Documentation:
  • Add graphrag.mdx for knowledge graph creation and enrichment in the Python SDK.
  • Update mint.json to include graphrag in the documentation navigation.
• CLI Enhancements:
  • Add --entity-names option to get_triples command in kg.py.
• API Enhancements:
  • Add entity_names parameter to get_triples in kg_router.py and kg.py.
• Database Queries:
  • Include extraction_ids and document_id in get_entities query in postgres.py.

^{This description was created by for a5dfcd3. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
yc_demo	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Oct 11, 2024 6:35pm
yc-demo	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Oct 11, 2024 6:35pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
recommendation_platform	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Oct 11, 2024 6:35pm

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on a5dfcd3 in 21 seconds

More details

• Looked at 12 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. py/shared/utils/base_utils.py:264

• Draft comment:
  Remove the unnecessary import statement for pdb.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment is about a change made in the diff, specifically the removal of the 'pdb' import and the 'pdb.set_trace()' line. The comment is correct because the import statement is no longer needed after the removal of 'pdb.set_trace()'.
  The comment might be considered unnecessary since the change has already been made in the diff, making the comment redundant.
  Even though the change has been made, the comment correctly identifies the reason for the change, which is the removal of an unnecessary import.
  The comment is correct in identifying the removal of an unnecessary import statement, but since the change has already been made, the comment is redundant and should be deleted.

Workflow ID: wflow_HcXoRlKWQ08ueRq8

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 743361d in 1 minute and 5 seconds

More details

• Looked at 757 lines of code in 9 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. py/cli/commands/kg.py:202

• Draft comment:
  Ensure force_kg_creation is merged with kg_creation_settings if both are provided, instead of overwriting kg_creation_settings.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful.

2. py/core/main/api/kg_router.py:160

• Draft comment:
  Ensure entity_names is passed as a list, not a comma-separated string, to the get_triples function.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful.

3. py/core/providers/kg/postgres.py:974

• Draft comment:
  Include the category field in the SELECT statement to match the expected output format for entities.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment suggests a change to include the category field in the SELECT statement. However, the diff only shows changes related to extraction_ids and document_id. The category field is used elsewhere in the file, but there is no strong evidence that it is needed in this specific SELECT statement. Without more context on the requirements of the get_entities function, it's unclear if this change is necessary.
  I might be missing the specific requirements of the get_entities function, which could necessitate the inclusion of the category field. However, without explicit evidence or requirements, it's speculative to assume the change is needed.
  The absence of the category field in the original and modified SELECT statement suggests it might not be required for the function's purpose. Without clear evidence, the comment seems speculative.
  Delete the comment as it suggests a speculative change without strong evidence of necessity.

Workflow ID: wflow_vulNWYqfmL2WSvD8

---

Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

Remove the pdb.set_trace() call, as it is likely a leftover from debugging and should not be in production code.