Nolan/ingest chunks js

[NolanTrem]

Important

Add ingestChunks feature to r2rClient and API, with tests and documentation updates.

• Behavior:
  • Add ingestChunks method to r2rClient class in r2rClient.ts for ingesting text chunks.
  • Add ingest_chunks endpoint to ingestion_router.py for handling chunk ingestion.
  • Update ingestion_workflow.py to process chunk ingestion.
• Tests:
  • Add tests for ingestChunks in r2rClientIntegrationSuperUser.test.ts and r2rClientIntegrationUser.test.ts.
  • Ensure chunk ingestion tests cover cases with and without document IDs and metadata.
• Documentation:
  • Update graphrag.mdx to reflect new r2r serve command usage.
• Misc:
  • Change status code for invalid document ID format from 400 to 422 in management_router.py.

^{This description was created by for 7e3101e. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
yc_demo	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Oct 11, 2024 0:37am
yc-demo	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Oct 11, 2024 0:37am

1 Skipped Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
recommendation_platform	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Oct 11, 2024 0:37am

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 5695186 in 48 seconds

More details

• Looked at 339 lines of code in 9 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 5 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. docs/cookbooks/graphrag.mdx:120

• Draft comment:
  The addition of --full might be redundant if --config-name=full already implies a full configuration. Consider clarifying this in the documentation.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The change in the command from --config-name=full to --full --docker --config-name=full seems to be an enhancement to make the command more explicit. However, the --full flag might be redundant if --config-name=full already implies a full configuration. This should be clarified in the documentation or code comments.

2. js/sdk/__tests__/r2rClientIntegrationSuperUser.test.ts:128

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding assertions to verify the expected outcomes after calling ingestChunks to ensure the functionality is working as intended.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The test cases for ingestChunks in r2rClientIntegrationSuperUser.test.ts are well-structured, but they lack assertions to verify the expected outcomes. Adding assertions would ensure the tests validate the functionality correctly.

3. js/sdk/__tests__/r2rClientIntegrationUser.test.ts:31

• Draft comment:
  The ingestChunks test is marked as not implemented. Consider implementing this test to ensure full coverage.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The test case for ingestChunks in r2rClientIntegrationUser.test.ts is marked with an 'X', indicating it's not implemented. This should be addressed to ensure full test coverage.

4. py/core/main/api/ingestion_router.py:275

• Draft comment:
  Ensure that document_id is consistently handled as a UUID throughout the function to avoid potential type errors.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The document_id parameter in the ingest_chunks_app function is being converted to a UUID, but the function signature expects a string. This could lead to confusion or errors if not handled properly.

5. py/core/main/api/ingestion_router.py:321

• Draft comment:
  Consider returning the dictionary directly instead of a list if only one response is expected.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The ingest_chunks_app function in ingestion_router.py returns a list containing a single dictionary. This might be unnecessary if only one response is expected. Consider returning the dictionary directly if multiple responses are not needed.

Workflow ID: wflow_oGzGLOznvZGfgJV1

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 7e3101e in 38 seconds

More details

• Looked at 697 lines of code in 3 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. docs/documentation/js-sdk/ingestion.mdx:196

• Draft comment:
  The opening and closing backticks for the JavaScript code block are incorrect. They should be three backticks instead of four.

```javascript

• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The documentation for the ingestChunks method in ingestion.mdx has a minor formatting issue with the code block. The opening and closing backticks for the JavaScript code block are incorrect, which could lead to rendering issues.

Workflow ID: wflow_Q7H2LpEE2Rc7wsB6

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.