-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ufs dev PR#251 #1112
Ufs dev PR#251 #1112
Conversation
Sixth reconciliation PR from production/RRFS.v1
Merge NCAR:main to ufs-community:ufs/dev + update GF/C3 for SRW3.0 release
… into ufs-dev-pr251
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ jobs: | |||
run: echo "GIT_REMOTE_HASH=`git rev-parse HEAD`" >> $GITHUB_ENV | |||
|
|||
- name: Checkout latest fv3atm | |||
run: git clone https://github.com/NCAR/fv3atm.git | |||
run: git clone https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/fv3atm.git |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Come to think of it, I'm not entirely sure that we need this file anymore since we're not maintaining our own branch of fv3atm? At least when this CI is run in the NCAR repo, it will fail henceforth I think. Wasn't the point of this test to sorta provide a "heads up" that the host (SCM) needs to change metadata somehow when physics PRs are introduced? It's trying to build the current fv3 with the PR branch physics. I guess that might still serve a purpose for the ufs/dev branch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I think what we want to do is:
In the NCAR:ccpp-physics we should have a CI test that runs prebuild using the SCM metadata.
In the UFS:ccpp-physics we should have a CI test that runs prebuild using the FV3 metadata.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fine as-is. Left a comment about the ci_fv3_ccpp_prebuild workflow.
@grantfirl I opened an issue so we dont forget, #1113 |
Contains changes from PR #251