Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating with correct docker registry and docker repo #2375

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

felderi
Copy link
Contributor

@felderi felderi commented Oct 13, 2020

Updating with correct docker registry and docker repo

Updating with correct docker registry and docker repo
@felderi felderi requested a review from a team as a code owner October 13, 2020 21:15
@lena-larionova
Copy link
Contributor

@felderi Looks like I missed something along the way - I thought we deprecated kong-enterprise-k8s in favor of kong-enterprise-edition across the board?

For reference, here's our deployment options topic: https://docs.konghq.com/enterprise/2.1.x/kong-for-kubernetes/deployment-options/
and release notes: https://docs.konghq.com/enterprise/2.1.x/release-notes/#kong-for-kubernetes-enterprise-k4k8s-image-changes

Did that not actually end up happening?

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 13, 2020

Deploy preview for kongdocs ready!

Built with commit 2968848

https://deploy-preview-2375--kongdocs.netlify.app

@felderi
Copy link
Contributor Author

felderi commented Oct 14, 2020

Probably worth double checking this but the instructions did not work for me @lena-larionova. Changing to what I submitted in the PR worked for me.

@felderi
Copy link
Contributor Author

felderi commented Oct 14, 2020

Li Yang ran into this as well: https://kongstrong.slack.com/archives/C0DSXDXV1/p1602643762332900. I also spoke to Damon that also ran into the same issue...

@lena-larionova
Copy link
Contributor

@rainest FYI - can you clarify what's going on here? I've checked the KIC repo, looks like kong-enterprise-k8s is still going strong with a 2.1.4.1 image. I guess there was a misunderstanding somewhere along the way?

@rainest
Copy link
Contributor

rainest commented Oct 14, 2020

I got all sorts of confused this morning, but I think I now understand more or less what happened:

  • The kong-enterprise-k8s to kong-enterprise-edition switch was in a weird state when the deprecation happened. 2.1 was still in beta when we decided to make the switch, and as such we did not update documentation content (Helm and KIC READMEs and examples) that do not distinguish between beta and stable/prod-ready. The K8S team decided to leave them at stable during the beta period.
  • Following the stable release of 2.1, we updated some examples, but not all. This change should have gone into the 1.0.0 KIC release, but we missed it.
  • The docs site instructions were updated during the beta because the docs site does make the beta/stable distinction.

Kong/kubernetes-ingress-controller#909 corrects that, and should be the last holdout. Though we shouldn't encounter this particular problem going forward (the change to kong-enterprise-edition was a one-off change for 2.1), it does highlight a general class of issue we'll have with the new beta/stable Enterprise release pattern. We'll need to think of way to handle that for the Helm and KIC repo examples going forward, though I'm unsure what the best option is.

@felderi will go ahead and close this since we shouldn't merge it in: kong-enterprise-edition is correct going forward. If there any remaining issues, we should discuss those in Kong/kubernetes-ingress-controller#909

Note that doc site instructions will still be misaligned until KIC#909 is merged, as instructions point to main. If you want to test in advance of that, replacing main with fix/enterprise-version should work temporarily.

@rainest rainest closed this Oct 14, 2020
@lena-larionova lena-larionova deleted the felderi-docker-repo-update branch March 9, 2021 23:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants