Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revise modified ADM1 rxns and BSM2-P flowsheet #1467

Closed
wants to merge 86 commits into from

Conversation

adam-a-a
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes/Resolves:

Summary/Motivation:

The extended BSM2-P flowsheet still has stability issues. Here, I check if adjustments to expressions in modified ADM1 will improve BSM2-P stability after the addition of costing, which seems to become more unstable and cannot pass tests consistently after that point.

Changes proposed in this PR:

  • add epsilon value to denominators of reaction rate expressions in modified ADM1

Legal Acknowledgement

By contributing to this software project, I agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution:

  1. I agree my contributions are submitted under the license terms described in the LICENSE.txt file at the top level of this directory.
  2. I represent I am authorized to make the contributions and grant the license. If my employer has rights to intellectual property that includes these contributions, I represent that I have received permission to make contributions and grant the required license on behalf of that employer.

@adam-a-a adam-a-a marked this pull request as draft July 17, 2024 20:36
@ksbeattie ksbeattie added the Priority:Normal Normal Priority Issue or PR label Jul 18, 2024
@lbianchi-lbl
Copy link
Contributor

This is one of the attempts to troubleshoot the BSM2-P flowsheet, together with #1468 and #1469.

@ksbeattie
Copy link
Contributor

Replaced by #1468

@ksbeattie ksbeattie closed this Sep 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority:Normal Normal Priority Issue or PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants