-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: editor package add peer dependencies #242
The head ref may contain hidden characters: "241-bug\u66F4\u65B0\u6700\u65B0\u7248\u672C558\u62A5\u9519"
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request implements updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/editor/package.json (1)
56-62
: Tightened version control for internal dependenciesThe change from caret (^) to tilde (~) versioning for the @wangeditor-next dependencies indicates a more conservative approach to dependency management. This modification will restrict automatic updates to patch versions only, potentially improving stability but limiting automatic feature updates.
Consider the following implications:
- Increased stability: By limiting updates to patch versions, you reduce the risk of introducing breaking changes.
- Manual update requirement: You'll need to manually update these dependencies for minor version upgrades, which may require more maintenance effort.
- Consistency: Ensure this versioning strategy aligns with your project's overall dependency management policy.
To maintain consistency and clearly communicate this change:
- Update your contribution guidelines to reflect this new versioning strategy for internal dependencies.
- Consider adding a comment in the
package.json
file explaining the reasoning behind using tilde versioning for these specific dependencies.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lock
is excluded by!**/yarn.lock
,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- .changeset/empty-forks-design.md (1 hunks)
- .changeset/pre.json (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/package.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .changeset/empty-forks-design.md
- .changeset/pre.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/editor/package.json (1)
56-62
: Verify dependency version consistency across the projectTo ensure that these version changes are consistent across the project and don't introduce conflicts, it's important to verify the usage of these dependencies in other parts of the project.
Run the following script to check for version consistency:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies in the versions of these dependencies across different
package.json
files in the project. Review the output to ensure that the versions are consistent or that any differences are intentional.✅ Verification successful
Dependency versions are consistent across the project
All tested dependencies have matching versions in
packages/editor/package.json
and are not duplicated elsewhere in the project, ensuring consistency.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency of @wangeditor-next dependency versions across the project # Function to extract version from package.json extract_version() { jq -r ".dependencies[\"$1\"] // .devDependencies[\"$1\"] // empty" "$2" } # List of dependencies to check dependencies=( "@wangeditor-next/basic-modules" "@wangeditor-next/code-highlight" "@wangeditor-next/core" "@wangeditor-next/list-module" "@wangeditor-next/table-module" "@wangeditor-next/upload-image-module" "@wangeditor-next/video-module" ) # Find all package.json files package_jsons=$(fd package.json) # Check each dependency for dep in "${dependencies[@]}"; do echo "Checking versions for $dep:" for pkg_json in $package_jsons; do version=$(extract_version "$dep" "$pkg_json") if [ ! -z "$version" ]; then echo " $pkg_json: $version" fi done echo "" doneLength of output: 29777
e25ba82
to
463cf02
Compare
Changes Overview
Implementation Approach
Testing Done
Verification Steps
Additional Notes
Checklist
Related Issues
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Updates
@wangeditor-next/editor
package.Refactor