Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(text): text tag list #199

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

fix(text): text tag list #199

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

cycleccc
Copy link
Collaborator

@cycleccc cycleccc commented Sep 29, 2024

Compatible with the styles of nested tags such as b, strong, and sup

#196

Changes Overview

Implementation Approach

Testing Done

Verification Steps

Additional Notes

Checklist

  • I have created a changeset for this PR if necessary.
  • My changes do not break the library.
  • I have added tests where applicable.
  • I have followed the project guidelines.
  • I have fixed any lint issues.

Related Issues

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved logic for handling <span> and <code> HTML elements, enhancing parsing efficiency and clarity.
    • Enhanced compatibility with nested HTML tags like <b>, <strong>, and <sup> for better styling preservation in the editor.
  • Chores

    • Updated ESLint configuration to include additional file types and modified rules for unused variables.
    • Removed npm registry configuration, reverting to default behavior.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified the parseStyleHtml function for better readability and streamlined logic for font size and family assignment.

Compatible with the styles of nested tags such as b, strong, and sup

#196
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to ESLint configuration, npm registry settings, and modifications to several TypeScript functions related to HTML parsing. The ESLint configuration now includes additional file types and has adjusted rules for unused variables. The npm configuration has removed a specific registry URL, reverting to defaults. The TypeScript functions have been streamlined for better readability and efficiency, particularly in how HTML elements are processed, with unnecessary checks removed and parameters renamed for clarity.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.eslintrc.cjs Expanded files array to include additional file types; removed globals section; updated @typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars rule configuration.
.npmrc Removed npm registry URL configuration, reverting to default behavior.
packages/basic-modules/src/modules/font-size-family/parse-style-html.ts Updated parameter naming for clarity; simplified checks for font size and family; improved code formatting.
packages/core/src/parse-html/parse-elem-html.ts Restructured logic for handling <span> and <code> elements; simplified parsing flow; adjusted handling of text tags.
.changeset/slimy-numbers-sparkle.md Introduced a patch enhancing compatibility for <b>, <strong>, and <sup> tags in the editor.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Editor
    participant Parser
    participant TextNode

    Editor->>Parser: Call parseStyleHtml(text, node, _editor)
    Parser->>TextNode: Assign font size and family
    TextNode-->>Editor: Return updated text node
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where the code does play,
Changes hop along, brightening the day.
ESLint's rules, now clearer and bright,
Parsing HTML with newfound delight.
A dance of syntax, a joyful tune,
Bugs take flight, beneath the moon! 🌙✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9cd6c71 and b72b78d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .changeset/slimy-numbers-sparkle.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/src/parse-html/parse-elem-html.ts (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .changeset/slimy-numbers-sparkle.md
  • packages/core/src/parse-html/parse-elem-html.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/basic-modules/src/modules/font-size-family/parse-style-html.ts (2)

12-16: Approve function signature change with a suggestion.

The renaming of the editor parameter to _editor is a good practice to indicate that it's not used within the function. This improves code readability.

Consider removing the unused _editor parameter entirely if it's not needed in the function implementation. This would further simplify the function signature.


34-37: Approve font family handling changes with a suggestion for comment improvement.

The simplification of the font family handling logic is consistent with the changes made to font size handling, improving overall code readability.

Consider updating the comment on line 34 to be more specific:

- // 这里需要替换掉 ", css 设置 font-family,会将有空格的字体使用 " 包裹
+ // Remove quotes from font family names, as CSS wraps font names with spaces in quotes

This provides clearer context for why the quote replacement is necessary.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7158007 and cacca63.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .eslintrc.cjs (2 hunks)
  • .npmrc (0 hunks)
  • packages/basic-modules/src/modules/font-size-family/parse-style-html.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/src/parse-html/parse-elem-html.ts (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .npmrc
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/basic-modules/src/modules/font-size-family/parse-style-html.ts (2)

Line range hint 1-40: Overall assessment: Approved with minor suggestions and a request for clarification.

The changes in this file significantly simplify the parseStyleHtml function, improving its readability and maintainability. The removal of unused parameter references and simplification of font size and family handling are positive changes.

However, there are a few points to address:

  1. Consider removing the unused _editor parameter if it's not needed elsewhere.
  2. Clarify the implications of removing font size validation against the editor's configuration.
  3. Improve the comment for font family quote removal for better clarity.

These minor adjustments will further enhance the code quality and maintainability.


28-30: Approve font size handling changes with a request for clarification.

The simplification of the font size handling logic improves code readability. However, the removal of checks against the editor's configuration list raises a question.

Could you please clarify why the validation against the editor's font size list was removed? Are there any potential implications for font size consistency or user experience?

To verify the impact, let's check for any other usage of font size validation in the codebase:

.eslintrc.cjs (4)

19-28: Expanded ESLint coverage to additional file types.

The addition of .json, .cjs, and .mjs file types to the ESLint configuration is a positive change. This expansion will help maintain code consistency across more file formats in the project, potentially catching issues in configuration files and module scripts that were previously not linted.


Line range hint 1-141: Summary of ESLint configuration changes

The changes to .eslintrc.cjs include expanding linting coverage to additional file types, updating the @typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars rule, and removing the globals section. These changes are generally positive and should improve code consistency and maintainability.

However, to ensure these changes don't introduce unintended consequences, please:

  1. Run the provided verification scripts to check for new linting errors.
  2. Review the results and address any issues that may arise.
  3. Consider documenting these configuration changes in the project's coding standards or contribution guidelines.

If no issues are found after verification, these changes can be approved for merging.


Line range hint 1-141: Verify impact of removing globals section.

The AI-generated summary mentions the removal of the globals section that previously defined document and window as false. While this change is not visible in the provided diff, it's important to address its potential impact.

Removing these global definitions might affect how ESLint treats document and window references in the codebase, potentially leading to false positives for undefined variables in browser environments.

To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the linting process for browser-specific code, please run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any new ESLint errors related to document and window globals

# Run ESLint on all JavaScript and TypeScript files and filter for document and window related errors
eslint_output=$(npx eslint --ext .js,.jsx,.ts,.tsx . | grep -E "('document' is not defined|'window' is not defined)")

if [ -n "$eslint_output" ]; then
  echo "Found potential issues with document or window globals after removing the globals section:"
  echo "$eslint_output"
else
  echo "No issues found with document or window globals after removing the globals section."
fi

This script will help identify any new linting errors related to document and window that may have been introduced by removing the globals section.


117-117: Updated @typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars rule configuration.

The change from ignoreRestSiblings: true to argsIgnorePattern: '^_' is a good practice that allows for explicitly marking unused parameters. This can improve code readability and maintainability.

However, please ensure this change aligns with the project's coding standards and doesn't introduce new linting errors in the existing codebase.

To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:

This script will help identify any new linting errors related to unused variables that may have been introduced by this configuration change.

packages/core/src/parse-html/parse-elem-html.ts (1)

75-76: Good practice in handling default element parsing

The final return statement ensures that any unhandled tags are parsed using parseCommonElemHtml:

return parseCommonElemHtml($elem, editor)

This catches all other elements not specifically processed earlier, enhancing the robustness of the parsing function.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.changeset/slimy-numbers-sparkle.md (1)

1-6: LGTM! Changeset looks good.

The changeset is correctly structured and appropriately describes the changes as a patch for both @wangeditor-next/basic-modules and @wangeditor-next/core. The description accurately reflects the purpose of the changes.

Consider slightly expanding the description for more clarity:

-Compatible with the styles of nested tags such as b, strong, and sup
+Improved compatibility with styles of nested tags (e.g., <b>, <strong>, <sup>) to ensure correct rendering within the editor

This provides a bit more context about the change and its impact.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cacca63 and 9cd6c71.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .changeset/slimy-numbers-sparkle.md (1 hunks)

avoids altering the parent $elem[0] and ensures that each child is parsed correctly.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant