Reverting #914

[jsdevel]

cc @herom @pihvi

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.07%) to 93.266% when pulling 2f8c045 on reverting-914 into 94a8b54 on master.

[jsdevel]

Just a heads up @vfrbgt, #914 broke existing behavior, so we're going to be reverting it. If you can re-apply your changes from #914 in a way that allows the latest tests from @pihvi to pass we'll happily merge them back.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 93.215% when pulling f2f05fc on reverting-914 into 94a8b54 on master.

[jsdevel]

Published as v0.19.1 cc @herom

[pihvi]

Works now, thanks for the fast response!

Also just want to say I was a bit terrified to have to work with SOAP in my project. I wanted to try if Node.js could handle soap. And when it was just npm install soap, read the wsdl and I got a working client with all the methods eating JSON, I was just blown away and happy! It's almost better than REST ;) But anyway.. THANK YOU for node-soap!

[jsdevel]

Also just want to say I was a bit terrified to have to work with SOAP in my project. I wanted to try if Node.js could handle soap. And when it was just npm install soap, read the wsdl and I got a working client with all the methods eating JSON, I was just blown away and happy! It's almost better than REST ;) But anyway.. THANK YOU for node-soap!

@herom we should start a testimonial section in the README 😆

[herom]

@jsdevel yeah, with a "disclaimer" saying: "If you have to deal with SOAP - good luck" 😈