-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 258
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix nstf setting for coupled model, update atm aerosol test to use P8 configuration #1218
fix nstf setting for coupled model, update atm aerosol test to use P8 configuration #1218
Conversation
Original labels on Cheyenne don't seem to have started, so re-trying. |
Automated RT Failure Notification |
On jet.intel, the hafs failure was a timeout. The rap_sfcdiff_debug test failed with
The job appeared to actually run but failed writing something at Finalize. |
On Cheyenne.intel, a lot of baseline jobs have failed. They all seem to be associated with the same error in the run_*.log:
and then later
|
Didn't Cheyenne tend to kill pbs jobs at the midnight time for that machine? 5 hours and 22 minutes is a long time to run too. I' have never seen that Cheyenne error before, though. |
I put in a ticket to the help desk on Cheyenne. The job Q seems stuck---just a few jobs running but almost all are just sitting in the Q (not just mine). (edit: I started the jobs manually on Cheyenne early this morning) |
1pm MT I think is when it kills jobs started by cron … jobs in the queue or running in PBS aren’t affected, but the auto-rt/rt.sh scripts are.
… On Jun 1, 2022, at 6:40 AM, Brian Curtis ***@***.***> wrote:
Didn't Cheyenne tend to kill pbs jobs at the midnight time for that machine? 5 hours and 22 minutes is a long time to run too. I' have never seen that Cheyenne error before, though.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1218 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB5C2RMLQKB7S7DNCTYF5RLVM5K37ANCNFSM5V4IYECA>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
|
on-behalf-of @ufs-community <brian.curtis@noaa.gov>
Automated RT Failure Notification |
I think I need to increase resources on cheyenne.intel for the new atmaero p8 test
|
* configuration requires more resources to run on cheyenne
on-behalf-of @ufs-community <brian.curtis@noaa.gov>
All RTs are finished. |
@MinsukJi-NOAA Please review |
PR Checklist
This PR is up-to-date with the top of all sub-component repositories except for those sub-components which are the subject of this PR. Please consult the ufs-weather-model wiki if you are unsure how to do this.
This PR has been tested using a branch which is up-to-date with the top of all sub-component repositories except for those sub-components which are the subject of this PR
An Issue describing the work contained in this PR has been created either in the subcomponent(s) or in the ufs-weather-model. The Issue should be created in the repository that is most relevant to the changes in contained in the PR. The Issue and the dependent sub-component PR
are specified below.
Results for one or more of the regression tests change and the reasons for the changes are understood and explained below.
New or updated input data is required by this PR. If checked, please work with the code managers to update input data sets on all platforms.
Instructions: All subsequent sections of text should be filled in as appropriate.
The information provided below allows the code managers to understand the changes relevant to this PR, whether those changes are in the ufs-weather-model repository or in a subcomponent repository. Ufs-weather-model code managers will use the information provided to add any applicable labels, assign reviewers and place it in the Commit Queue. Once the PR is in the Commit Queue, it is the PR owner's responsiblity to keep the PR up-to-date with the develop branch of ufs-weather-model.
Description
Provide a detailed description of what this PR does. What bug does it fix, or what feature does it add? Is a change of answers expected from this PR? Are any library updates included in this PR (modulefiles etc.)?
Issue(s) addressed
Link the issues to be closed with this PR, whether in this repository, or in another repository.
(Remember, issues must always be created before starting work on a PR branch!)
Testing
This branch was tested against the existing
develop-20220517
at 062a0fd for both hera.intel and hera.gnu. The following tests failed, as expected:DOGP_LWSCAT
and change toNSTF_NAME
)For the new
atmaero_control_p8
test, theinput.nml
and aerosol rc files were compared against the existingcpld_control_p8
test. The files were identical except for the followingatmaero_control_p8
test passed bit_base, dbg_base, dcp, fhz, mpi, rst, std_base and thr oRT tests.Dependencies
None. Script level changes only.