Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added configurable assertions - fix #139 #140

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 30, 2014

Conversation

stefanjudis
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@stefanjudis stefanjudis added this to the v0.11.0 milestone Nov 30, 2014
@stefanjudis stefanjudis self-assigned this Nov 30, 2014
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.43%) when pulling d2b3622 on feature/139-configurable-assertions into 10e3cbe on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.09%) when pulling 822e7d6 on feature/139-configurable-assertions into 10e3cbe on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.09%) when pulling fcbda96 on feature/139-configurable-assertions into 10e3cbe on master.

increased test coverage - #139

updated docs - #139

fix for minifier removing spaces in headline - #139
@stefanjudis stefanjudis force-pushed the feature/139-configurable-assertions branch from 353250a to 6481855 Compare November 30, 2014 12:45
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.09%) when pulling 6481855 on feature/139-configurable-assertions into 10e3cbe on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.09%) when pulling 6481855 on feature/139-configurable-assertions into 10e3cbe on master.

stefanjudis added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2014
…ertions

added configurable assertions - fix #139
@stefanjudis stefanjudis merged commit 6d53a60 into master Nov 30, 2014
@stefanjudis stefanjudis deleted the feature/139-configurable-assertions branch November 30, 2014 12:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants