Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase the price of bulletproof armor. #34541

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2025

Conversation

centcomofficer24
Copy link
Contributor

@centcomofficer24 centcomofficer24 commented Jan 20, 2025

About the PR

I have changed the price of the bulletproof vests from 725 spesos to 1250 spesos.

Why / Balance

I believe that armor normally restricted to security should be slighty more expensive than 725. So I increased it to 1.25K instead.
While, for a solo antag this makes not too much difference, in situations like revs or nukies, it means that crew/revs take slightly more time to fully arm up if cargo has been slacking. Future changes, such as the increase of helmets aswell could lead to Cargo becoming more productive in the future.

Technical details

Changed the value of armor crate inside cargo_security.yml from 725 to 1250, thats it.

Requirements

Changelog

🆑

  • tweak: Increased the armor crates price from 725 spesos to 1250 spesos.

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines. Changes: No C# Changes: Requires no C# knowledge to review or fix this item. S: Untriaged Status: Indicates an item has not been triaged and doesn't have appropriate labels. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines. labels Jan 20, 2025
@slarticodefast
Copy link
Member

Let me summon our expert on weapon and security balance.
@SlamBamActionman

@ArtisticRoomba ArtisticRoomba added P3: Standard Priority: Default priority for repository items. T: Balance Change Type: Balance changes through direct value changes, or changes to mechanics that affect it DB: Beginner Friendly Difficulty: Great for beginners. Unambiguous in scope, and explains how to achieve the result. A: Cargo/Salvage Area: Cargo department or Salvage. A: Roundflow/Antag Area: Roundflow - "What happens in the game", including antagonist roles and their capabilities and removed S: Untriaged Status: Indicates an item has not been triaged and doesn't have appropriate labels. labels Jan 21, 2025
Copy link
Member

@slarticodefast slarticodefast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I asked slam and he said the price increase makes sense balance wise.

@slarticodefast slarticodefast added the S: Approved Status: Reviewed and approved by at least one maintainer; a PR may require another approval. label Feb 11, 2025
@SlamBamActionman
Copy link
Member

Bulletproof vests are very strong in most intense combat situations and honestly a very good reason for Nukies to always space the station. A price increase makes sense I suppose, but I am uncertain of what the "real" value of the crate is. For now, looks good!

@SlamBamActionman SlamBamActionman merged commit 0feeaba into space-wizards:master Feb 11, 2025
14 checks passed
@centcomofficer24
Copy link
Contributor Author

yippee

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A: Cargo/Salvage Area: Cargo department or Salvage. A: Roundflow/Antag Area: Roundflow - "What happens in the game", including antagonist roles and their capabilities Changes: No C# Changes: Requires no C# knowledge to review or fix this item. DB: Beginner Friendly Difficulty: Great for beginners. Unambiguous in scope, and explains how to achieve the result. P3: Standard Priority: Default priority for repository items. S: Approved Status: Reviewed and approved by at least one maintainer; a PR may require another approval. T: Balance Change Type: Balance changes through direct value changes, or changes to mechanics that affect it
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants