fix seed in tests #14
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rxin
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2015
This PR try to speed up some python tests: ``` tests.py 144s -> 103s -41s mllib/classification.py 24s -> 17s -7s mllib/regression.py 27s -> 15s -12s mllib/tree.py 27s -> 13s -14s mllib/tests.py 64s -> 31s -33s streaming/tests.py 185s -> 84s -101s ``` Considering python3, the total saving will be 558s (almost 10 minutes) (core, and streaming run three times, mllib runs twice). During testing, it will show used time for each test file: ``` Run core tests ... Running test: pyspark/rdd.py ... ok (22s) Running test: pyspark/context.py ... ok (16s) Running test: pyspark/conf.py ... ok (4s) Running test: pyspark/broadcast.py ... ok (4s) Running test: pyspark/accumulators.py ... ok (4s) Running test: pyspark/serializers.py ... ok (6s) Running test: pyspark/profiler.py ... ok (5s) Running test: pyspark/shuffle.py ... ok (1s) Running test: pyspark/tests.py ... ok (103s) 144s ``` Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com> Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com> Closes apache#5605 from rxin/python-tests-speed and squashes the following commits: d08542d [Reynold Xin] Merge pull request #14 from mengxr/SPARK-6953 89321ee [Xiangrui Meng] fix seed in tests 3ad2387 [Reynold Xin] Merge pull request apache#5427 from davies/python_tests
rxin
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2015
…into a single batch. SQL ``` select * from tableA join tableB on (a > 3 and b = d) or (a > 3 and b = e) ``` Plan before modify ``` == Optimized Logical Plan == Project [a#293,b#294,c#295,d#296,e#297] Join Inner, Some(((a#293 > 3) && ((b#294 = d#296) || (b#294 = e#297)))) MetastoreRelation default, tablea, None MetastoreRelation default, tableb, None ``` Plan after modify ``` == Optimized Logical Plan == Project [a#293,b#294,c#295,d#296,e#297] Join Inner, Some(((b#294 = d#296) || (b#294 = e#297))) Filter (a#293 > 3) MetastoreRelation default, tablea, None MetastoreRelation default, tableb, None ``` CombineLimits ==> Limit(If(LessThan(ne, le), ne, le), grandChild) and LessThan is in BooleanSimplification , so CombineLimits must before BooleanSimplification and BooleanSimplification must before PushPredicateThroughJoin. Author: Zhongshuai Pei <799203320@qq.com> Author: DoingDone9 <799203320@qq.com> Closes apache#6351 from DoingDone9/master and squashes the following commits: 20de7be [Zhongshuai Pei] Update Optimizer.scala 7bc7d28 [Zhongshuai Pei] Merge pull request #17 from apache/master 0ba5f42 [Zhongshuai Pei] Update Optimizer.scala f8b9314 [Zhongshuai Pei] Update FilterPushdownSuite.scala c529d9f [Zhongshuai Pei] Update FilterPushdownSuite.scala ae3af6d [Zhongshuai Pei] Update FilterPushdownSuite.scala a04ffae [Zhongshuai Pei] Update Optimizer.scala 11beb61 [Zhongshuai Pei] Update FilterPushdownSuite.scala f2ee5fe [Zhongshuai Pei] Update Optimizer.scala be6b1d5 [Zhongshuai Pei] Update Optimizer.scala b01e622 [Zhongshuai Pei] Merge pull request #15 from apache/master 8df716a [Zhongshuai Pei] Update FilterPushdownSuite.scala d98bc35 [Zhongshuai Pei] Update FilterPushdownSuite.scala fa65718 [Zhongshuai Pei] Update Optimizer.scala ab8e9a6 [Zhongshuai Pei] Merge pull request #14 from apache/master 14952e2 [Zhongshuai Pei] Merge pull request #13 from apache/master f03fe7f [Zhongshuai Pei] Merge pull request #12 from apache/master f12fa50 [Zhongshuai Pei] Merge pull request #10 from apache/master f61210c [Zhongshuai Pei] Merge pull request #9 from apache/master 34b1a9a [Zhongshuai Pei] Merge pull request #8 from apache/master 802261c [DoingDone9] Merge pull request #7 from apache/master d00303b [DoingDone9] Merge pull request #6 from apache/master 98b134f [DoingDone9] Merge pull request #5 from apache/master 161cae3 [DoingDone9] Merge pull request #4 from apache/master c87e8b6 [DoingDone9] Merge pull request #3 from apache/master cb1852d [DoingDone9] Merge pull request #2 from apache/master c3f046f [DoingDone9] Merge pull request #1 from apache/master
rxin
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2016
…gle batch
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR support multiple Python UDFs within single batch, also improve the performance.
```python
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import IntegerType
>>> sqlContext.registerFunction("double", lambda x: x * 2, IntegerType())
>>> sqlContext.registerFunction("add", lambda x, y: x + y, IntegerType())
>>> sqlContext.sql("SELECT double(add(1, 2)), add(double(2), 1)").explain(True)
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [unresolvedalias('double('add(1, 2)), None),unresolvedalias('add('double(2), 1), None)]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
double(add(1, 2)): int, add(double(2), 1): int
Project [double(add(1, 2))#14,add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- Project [double(add(1, 2))#14,add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- EvaluatePython [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#18]
+- EvaluatePython [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- EvaluatePython [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#18]
+- EvaluatePython [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17,pythonUDF0#18]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new tests.
Using the following script to benchmark 1, 2 and 3 udfs,
```
df = sqlContext.range(1, 1 << 23, 1, 4)
double = F.udf(lambda x: x * 2, LongType())
print df.select(double(df.id)).count()
print df.select(double(df.id), double(df.id + 1)).count()
print df.select(double(df.id), double(df.id + 1), double(df.id + 2)).count()
```
Here is the results:
N | Before | After | speed up
---- |------------ | -------------|------
1 | 22 s | 7 s | 3.1X
2 | 38 s | 13 s | 2.9X
3 | 58 s | 16 s | 3.6X
This benchmark ran locally with 4 CPUs. For 3 UDFs, it launched 12 Python before before this patch, 4 process after this patch. After this patch, it will use less memory for multiple UDFs than before (less buffering).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes apache#12057 from davies/multi_udfs.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.