Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify calling find_implied_output_region. #38036

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2016

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@nnethercote added the optimization that find_implied_output_region
takes a closure as an optimization in #37014, but passing an iterator is
simpler, and more ergonomic for callers.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @arielb1

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Dec 6, 2016

This PR looks good to me.

@nnethercote added the optimization that find_implied_output_region
takes a closure as an optimization in rust-lang#37014, but passing an iterator is
simpler, and more ergonomic for callers.
@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Dec 6, 2016

@bors r=nagisa,eddyb

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 6, 2016

📌 Commit cc6edb2 has been approved by nagisa,eddyb

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 6, 2016

⌛ Testing commit cc6edb2 with merge b5d0f90...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2016
Simplify calling find_implied_output_region.

@nnethercote added the optimization that find_implied_output_region
takes a closure as an optimization in #37014, but passing an iterator is
simpler, and more ergonomic for callers.
@bors bors merged commit cc6edb2 into rust-lang:master Dec 6, 2016
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum deleted the polish-2 branch December 27, 2016 00:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants