Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert using ? for try! in the libsyntax pretty printer #34312

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2016

Conversation

erickt
Copy link
Contributor

@erickt erickt commented Jun 16, 2016

The use of ...?instead of try!(...) in libsyntax makes extracting libsyntax into syntex quite painful since it's not stable yet. This makes backports take a much longer time and causes a lot of problems for the syntex dependencies. Even if it was, it'd take a few release cycles until syntex would be able to use it. Since it's not stable and that this feature is just syntax sugar, it would be most helpful if we could remove it.

cc #34311

The use of ...?instead of try!(...) in libsyntax makes
extracting libsyntax into syntex quite painful since it's
not stable yet. This makes backports take a much longer time
and causes a lot of problems for the syntex dependencies. Even
if it was, it'd take a few release cycles until syntex would
be able to use it. Since it's not stable and that this feature
is just syntax sugar, it would be most helpful if we could remove
it.

cc rust-lang#34311
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 16, 2016

📌 Commit ba5cab1 has been approved by nikomatsakis

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2016
Revert using ? for try! in the libsyntax pretty printer

The use of ...?instead of try!(...) in libsyntax makes extracting libsyntax into syntex quite painful since it's not stable yet. This makes backports take a much longer time and causes a lot of problems for the syntex dependencies. Even if it was, it'd take a few release cycles until syntex would be able to use it. Since it's not stable and that this feature is just syntax sugar, it would be most helpful if we could remove it.

cc rust-lang#34311
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2016
Rollup of 4 pull requests

- Successful merges: #34298, #34302, #34307, #34312
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit ba5cab1 into rust-lang:master Jun 17, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants