-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Streaming Generator] Fix a reference leak when a stream is deleted with out of order writes. #35591
Merged
rkooo567
merged 1 commit into
ray-project:master
from
rkooo567:streaming-generator-del-leak
May 24, 2023
Merged
[Streaming Generator] Fix a reference leak when a stream is deleted with out of order writes. #35591
rkooo567
merged 1 commit into
ray-project:master
from
rkooo567:streaming-generator-del-leak
May 24, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: SangBin Cho <rkooo567@gmail.com>
9 tasks
jjyao
approved these changes
May 24, 2023
rkooo567
added a commit
to rkooo567/ray
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2023
…ith out of order writes. (ray-project#35591) Currently, when we delete the ObjectRefStream, we have the following logics. Keeps reading the next references If it reaches EoF, finish reading it. If there's no next index, finish reading it. Since all these unconsumed objects have a local reference we call RemoveLocalReferences to remove references. This doesn't work well when the items are written in out of order, For example, see the following example. Write (index 1) -> Delete -> Write (index 0). In this case, Delete thinks there's no references in the stream because it checks index 0 and found there's no references. It stops reading the stream. This works when the ordering of write is ensured, but not when it is not. This PR fixes the issue by instead reading all unconsumed references via GetItemsUnconsumed API. This API will return every references that are not read yet. When the references are written out of order,
8 tasks
rkooo567
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2023
…ith out of order writes. (#35591) (#35707) Currently, when we delete the ObjectRefStream, we have the following logics. Keeps reading the next references If it reaches EoF, finish reading it. If there's no next index, finish reading it. Since all these unconsumed objects have a local reference we call RemoveLocalReferences to remove references. This doesn't work well when the items are written in out of order, For example, see the following example. Write (index 1) -> Delete -> Write (index 0). In this case, Delete thinks there's no references in the stream because it checks index 0 and found there's no references. It stops reading the stream. This works when the ordering of write is ensured, but not when it is not. This PR fixes the issue by instead reading all unconsumed references via GetItemsUnconsumed API. This API will return every references that are not read yet. When the references are written out of order,
scv119
pushed a commit
to scv119/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2023
…ith out of order writes. (ray-project#35591) Currently, when we delete the ObjectRefStream, we have the following logics. Keeps reading the next references If it reaches EoF, finish reading it. If there's no next index, finish reading it. Since all these unconsumed objects have a local reference we call RemoveLocalReferences to remove references. This doesn't work well when the items are written in out of order, For example, see the following example. Write (index 1) -> Delete -> Write (index 0). In this case, Delete thinks there's no references in the stream because it checks index 0 and found there's no references. It stops reading the stream. This works when the ordering of write is ensured, but not when it is not. This PR fixes the issue by instead reading all unconsumed references via GetItemsUnconsumed API. This API will return every references that are not read yet. When the references are written out of order,
arvind-chandra
pushed a commit
to lmco/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2023
…ith out of order writes. (ray-project#35591) Currently, when we delete the ObjectRefStream, we have the following logics. Keeps reading the next references If it reaches EoF, finish reading it. If there's no next index, finish reading it. Since all these unconsumed objects have a local reference we call RemoveLocalReferences to remove references. This doesn't work well when the items are written in out of order, For example, see the following example. Write (index 1) -> Delete -> Write (index 0). In this case, Delete thinks there's no references in the stream because it checks index 0 and found there's no references. It stops reading the stream. This works when the ordering of write is ensured, but not when it is not. This PR fixes the issue by instead reading all unconsumed references via GetItemsUnconsumed API. This API will return every references that are not read yet. When the references are written out of order, Signed-off-by: e428265 <arvind.chandramouli@lmco.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why are these changes needed?
Currently, when we delete the
ObjectRefStream
, we have the following logics.RemoveLocalReferences
to remove references.This doesn't work well when the items are written in out of order, For example, see the following example.
Write (index 1) -> Delete -> Write (index 0). In this case, Delete thinks there's no references in the stream because it checks index 0 and found there's no references. It stops reading the stream. This works when the ordering of write is ensured, but not when it is not.
This PR fixes the issue by instead reading all unconsumed references via
GetItemsUnconsumed
API. This API will return every references that are not read yet.When the references are written out of order,
Related issue number
Checks
git commit -s
) in this PR.scripts/format.sh
to lint the changes in this PR.method in Tune, I've added it in
doc/source/tune/api/
under thecorresponding
.rst
file.