Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-44019: Add operator.call() to __all__ for the operator module #29110

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 21, 2021
Merged

bpo-44019: Add operator.call() to __all__ for the operator module #29110

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 21, 2021

Conversation

Kreusada
Copy link
Contributor

@Kreusada Kreusada commented Oct 20, 2021

It seems that this was missed from #27888, unless this was intentional.

https://bugs.python.org/issue44019

@corona10 corona10 changed the title Add operator.call() to __all__ for the operator module bpo-44019: Add operator.call() to __all__ for the operator module Oct 21, 2021
Copy link
Member

@corona10 corona10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@Kreusada
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have made the requested changes; please review again.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@corona10: please review the changes made to this pull request.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot requested a review from corona10 October 21, 2021 09:18
@corona10
Copy link
Member

@Kreusada Nice catch! Thank you for your contribution.

@Kreusada Kreusada deleted the patch-2 branch October 21, 2021 10:08
shihai1991 added a commit to shihai1991/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2021
* main: (263 commits)
  bpo-45521: Fix a bug in the obmalloc radix tree code. (pythonGH-29051)
  bpo-45522: Allow to disable freelists on build time (pythonGH-29056)
  bpo-34451: Document prompt and output toggle feature in html tutorial (pythonGH-27105)
  bpo-44019: Add operator.call() to __all__ for the operator module (pythonGH-29110)
  bpo-45315: PyType_FromSpec: Copy spec->name and have the type own the memory for its name (pythonGH-29103)
  bpo-44220: Export PyStructSequence_UnnamedField in the limited API (pythonGH-26331)
  bpo-44174: [Enum] add reference to name mangling (pythonGH-29116)
  bpo-45548: add some missing entries to `Modules/Setup` (pythonGH-29115)
  bpo-35673: Add a public alias for namespace package __loader__ attribute (python#29049)
  bpo-45192: Fix a bug that infers the type of an os.PathLike[bytes] object as str (pythonGH-28323)
  bpo-45527: Don't count cache hits, just misses. (pythonGH-29092)
  bpo-45320: Remove long-deprecated inspect methods (pythonGH-28618)
  bpo-41374: Remove obsolete exclusion of netinet/tcp.h on Cygwin (pythonGH-21649)
  bpo-45532: Replace 'default' with 'main' as default in sys.version (pythonGH-29100)
  bpo-45464: [doc] Explain that subclassing multiple exceptions is fragile (pythonGH-29094)
  Cleanup a couple of comments left on PR 28775 post-merge. (pythonGH-29079)
  bpo-45536: Check OpenSSL APIs in configure (pythonGH-29088)
  Add PEPs 593 & 647 to list of PEPs at top of typing docs (pythonGH-29097)
  Add a comment about how to fix bogus test_host_resolution_bad_address failures (python#29085)
  bpo-44525: Specialize simple Python calls. (pythonGH-29033)
  ...
@anntzer anntzer mannequin mentioned this pull request Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants