-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Townsend snow (building on #1251) #1468
Conversation
Several other small changes - variable names change, comment change - in response to Kevin's review notes
…ownsend_snow_loss
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @reepoi this is looking pretty good! A few comments below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Editorial comments, thanks @reepoi
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One or two things below that should be addressed before merging.
A comment more about the model than this PR: the geometry of the ground interference term seem strange to me in that it's only accounting for half of what I would expect from a snow pile. I expected the pile to be symmetrical (angle of repose on both sides), but I can only get the math to match the reference if one side of the pile is vertical. Is the idea that the forward momentum of the shedded snow allows it to populate only the "forward" half of the pile? To be explicit using the labels in my diagram below, I expected the dissipation area to comprise A_1
, A_2
, and their reflected counterparts on the other side of the "drop height" line, but it seems that Townsend & Powers don't count the reflected counterparts.
A communication with the model author T. Townsend: "the pile of snow was modeled as a triangle atop a rectangle, with yes, a vertical wall on the "north" side of the pile. This assumption, while an engineering approximation, is based on observing the shape of shedded snow piles, piles that are shaped by the slight forward (i.e., southward) velocity of the sliding/falling snow and ice." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @abhisheksparikh for getting this started and @reepoi for finishing it! Great to see this merged.
This builds off of pull request #1251 to add the changes suggested in the conversation there and wrap it up.
docs/sphinx/source/reference
for API changes.docs/sphinx/source/whatsnew
for all changes. Includes link to the GitHub Issue with:issue:`num`
or this Pull Request with:pull:`num`
. Includes contributor name and/or GitHub username (link with:ghuser:`user`
).