Update actions to use google-github-actions/auth@v1 and fix input syntax

[EddieLF]

So it looks like the new version of google-github-actions/setup-gcloud@v1 action no longer uses service_account_key as input. See this failed deploy, under the gcloud setup header.

Warning: Unexpected input(s) 'service_account_key', valid inputs are ['skip_install', 'version', 'project_id', 'install_components']
...
Warning: No authentication found for gcloud, authenticate with `google-github-actions/auth`.

Which is leading to a fail in the deploy config toml step.

ERROR: (gcloud.storage.cp) You do not currently have an active account selected.
Please run:

  $ gcloud auth login

to obtain new credentials.

From the actions repo, it looks like they now require use of the google-github-actions/auth action to first auth with the service_account_key (now called credentials_json) before running the gcloud setup.

Also updates the .github/workflows/deploy_container.yaml to use the @v1 version of the gcloud setup as well.

[jmarshall]

Mea culpa, I should have noticed that when I reviewed #117 as we had already run into the same thing in the metamist repo.

I previously made a similar change to this one to fix the same accident in populationgenomics/metamist#550, but we took the opportunity to move to use a federated identity instead in populationgenomics/metamist#553. Possibly that's something we would want to do in this repo too?

[illusional]

Hey @EddieLF, @jmarshall beat me to the suggestion, it's unclear to me at this stage which permissions one needs to do this so I've done it and added a couple of commits to your branch to address this.

(Test run: https://github.com/populationgenomics/images/actions/runs/6896771022/job/18763560951)

[jmarshall]

This quiet change in action parameters is exactly the sort of thing that actionlint should be able to detect. It knows about a bunch of common actions but so far not this one. However I've built a version locally that does, so hopefully we won't make this mistake again! And also proposed adding it upstream — see rhysd/actionlint#380.

[illusional]

Feels weird approving, but good to get this out

[illusional]

I'm going to revoke the gh-images-deployer credentials, keep an eye out for anything weird.