-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Auto recover #80
Merged
Merged
Auto recover #80
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
892045f
FIX: GCC state to be evaluated only when the HV_SW is true.
ghalym 0491272
MNT: .tmc
ghalym c24b927
FIX: GCC500 state change on first cycle
ghalym b54045d
FIX: Purge setting for VCN.
ghalym f24af15
DEV: AutoRecover is called from within the function block of the PIP …
ghalym 5f52234
FIX: After testing on kfe-vac added timer per device and reset delay …
ghalym 3e160c3
FIX: Constants to 422, still need ot fix one range
ghalym ab21653
FIX: using constant for Press ok
ghalym 236a582
FIX: GCC422 min pressure range and the catch all else statement.
ghalym File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
Binary file not shown.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably a dumb question as I'm drive-by reviewing for a project I have nothing to do with, but should this include:
AND Ig.xHV_SW
like the others?(If so, it might be a bit more readable to do a top-level
IF xHV_SW THEN (check voltages) ELSE set_off_state
)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it missing the range rv< 0.6 and rv>0.22? which should be valid or valid low?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should these values be local constants? Avoiding hardcoded values?