Box Decimals in Value to assure Value fits in 16 bytes

[jpschorr]

Having a smaller, more uniform, Value size should aide in data density and shows a small improvement on calculation-heavy workloads.

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 99.01% and project coverage change: -0.01 ⚠️

Comparison is base (d1bdfb0) 81.41% compared to head (7a5bedc) 81.40%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #411      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.41%   81.40%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          56       53       -3     
  Lines       14912    14907       -5     
  Branches    14912    14907       -5     
==========================================
- Hits        12140    12135       -5     
  Misses       2251     2251              
  Partials      521      521              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
partiql-logical-planner/src/lower.rs	85.78% <50.00%> (ø)
extension/partiql-extension-ion/src/decode.rs	77.42% <100.00%> (ø)
partiql-eval/src/eval/evaluable.rs	89.46% <100.00%> (ø)
partiql-eval/src/eval/expr/mod.rs	82.72% <100.00%> (ø)
partiql-value/src/lib.rs	96.45% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

... and 19 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[github-actions]

Conformance comparison report

	Base (d1bdfb0)	c463732	+/-
% Passing	84.12%	84.12%	0.00%
✅ Passing	5318	5318	0
❌ Failing	1004	1004	0
🔶 Ignored	0	0	0
Total Tests	6322	6322	0

Number passing in both: 5318

Number failing in both: 1004

Number passing in Base (d1bdfb0) but now fail: 0

Number failing in Base (d1bdfb0) but now pass: 0

[jpschorr]

See 309dd6a#commitcomment-122007994

PartiQL (rust) Benchmark

Benchmark suite Current: 309dd6a Previous: d1bdfb0 Ratio
parse-1 5562 ns/iter (± 162) 6534 ns/iter (± 472) 0.85
parse-15 51507 ns/iter (± 228) 59515 ns/iter (± 396) 0.87
parse-30 101079 ns/iter (± 90) 121699 ns/iter (± 795) 0.83
compile-1 5416 ns/iter (± 23) 6205 ns/iter (± 25) 0.87
compile-15 36476 ns/iter (± 95) 42933 ns/iter (± 78) 0.85
compile-30 73766 ns/iter (± 39) 86644 ns/iter (± 174) 0.85
plan-1 62788 ns/iter (± 199) 75216 ns/iter (± 222) 0.83
plan-15 992396 ns/iter (± 4118) 1212825 ns/iter (± 4490) 0.82
plan-30 1994707 ns/iter (± 3420) 2432922 ns/iter (± 11089) 0.82
eval-1 22185744 ns/iter (± 230734) 26858891 ns/iter (± 398062) 0.83
eval-15 125747983 ns/iter (± 504860) 144390233 ns/iter (± 805477) 0.87
eval-30 245001105 ns/iter (± 419301) 272423461 ns/iter (± 579099) 0.90
join 14698 ns/iter (± 89) 18172 ns/iter (± 43) 0.81
simple 7195 ns/iter (± 6) 8274 ns/iter (± 18) 0.87
simple-no 697 ns/iter (± 0) 885 ns/iter (± 2) 0.79
numbers 47 ns/iter (± 0) 173 ns/iter (± 1) 0.27
parse-simple 762 ns/iter (± 4) 888 ns/iter (± 49) 0.86
parse-ion 2532 ns/iter (± 63) 2796 ns/iter (± 104) 0.91
parse-group 7870 ns/iter (± 21) 8964 ns/iter (± 41) 0.88
parse-complex 19997 ns/iter (± 85) 24322 ns/iter (± 121) 0.82
parse-complex-fexpr 28494 ns/iter (± 117) 34943 ns/iter (± 146) 0.82

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.