-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 I am up for this change.
However, I am not completely sure that this renaming is 100% safe: I suspect that there may be a small chance that it alters some name or something. With macros you never know. Therefore I would defer to people who knows better
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same. I very much like this idea in principle but I do not know for sure that it doesn't accidentally change something important.
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <bkchr@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts commit 4227cd0.
bot merge |
Missing process info; check that the PR belongs to a project column. |
bot merge |
Missing approval from the project owner or a minimum of core developers. |
bot merge |
Trying merge. |
* master: Unalias Substrate Imports (#1530) Rewrite client handling (#1531) Integrate ChainApi with all messages (#1533) Add Rococo test network (#1363) Fix a typo parathreads -> parachains (#1529) Cleanup upcoming paras (#1527) Sudo wrapper for paras (#1517) Implementer's guide: notes on contextual execution (#1525) Companion for substrate/6782 (#1523) Sort out validation errors (#1516)
This PR updates a bunch of substrate crates to use their original crate name rather than aliases.
For example instead of
balances
, we now usepallet_balances
, just like in Substrate.