Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(plugins): 功能优化与问题修复 #833

Merged

Conversation

spongebody
Copy link

@spongebody spongebody commented Sep 29, 2024

English | 简体中文

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

优化

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Removed outdated section on UI and mock server design from the readme.
    • Added a new "TODO" section highlighting future tasks: optimization and improving documentation.
  • New Features

    • Introduced template management functionality, allowing users to select templates when creating new pages.
    • Enhanced page creation, copying, and deletion processes with improved user prompts and checks.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Added confirmation dialog for unsaved changes when copying a page.
  • Style

    • Improved readability of template and script sections in various components.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications across several files, primarily enhancing template management and page settings functionalities. Key updates include the addition of new properties in state management, the introduction of new methods for refreshing templates, and enhancements to page creation and management logic. The readme.md file has been updated to remove detailed design ideas, replaced by a "TODO" section focusing on future tasks. Overall, the updates aim to improve the handling of templates and page settings without altering existing functionalities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/plugins/template/readme.md Removed section on UI and mock server design; added "TODO" section with items for optimization and documentation improvement.
packages/controller/src/usePage.js Added properties template_content and templates to pageSettingState.
packages/controller/src/useTemplate.js Added methods refreshTemplateList and formatTreeData; updated export structure to include new methods.
packages/plugins/page/src/Main.vue Made createNewPage asynchronous; integrated refreshTemplateList; modified openSettingPanel logic.
packages/plugins/page/src/PageGeneral.vue Added <tiny-form-item> for template selection; introduced filterTemplate method and treeTemplateOp computed property.
packages/plugins/page/src/PageSetting.vue Enhanced createPage, copyPage, createHistoryMessage, and deletePage functions with new logic and user prompts.
packages/plugins/template/src/TemplateTree.vue Reformatted template and script sections for readability; removed standalone refreshTemplateList function.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, refactor-main

Suggested reviewers

  • hexqi
  • chilingling

Poem

In the meadow, changes bloom,
A readme sheds its old costume.
With tasks ahead, we hop and play,
Optimizing for a brighter day.
Documentation, clear and bright,
Guides our path with gentle light. 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ospp-2024 ospp-2024 label Sep 29, 2024
@spongebody spongebody marked this pull request as draft September 30, 2024 01:25
@spongebody spongebody changed the title feat(plugins): 优化功能 feat(plugins): 功能优化与问题修复 Sep 30, 2024
@spongebody spongebody marked this pull request as ready for review October 28, 2024 10:16
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 9

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
packages/controller/src/usePage.js (1)

52-53: Document the new template-related properties.

The new properties template_content and templates lack documentation explaining their purpose and expected data structure. This makes it harder for other developers to understand and use these properties correctly.

Add JSDoc comments above the pageSettingState declaration:

+/**
+ * @typedef {Object} PageSettingState
+ * @property {Object|null} template_content - Template content for the current page
+ * @property {Array<Object>} templates - List of available templates
+ * ...other properties
+ */
 const pageSettingState = reactive({
packages/plugins/page/src/Main.vue (2)

Line range hint 86-103: Refactor createNewPage for better separation of concerns

The method currently handles multiple responsibilities and could benefit from refactoring:

  1. Consider extracting template management logic
  2. Move magic strings to constants
  3. Add validation for appInfoState.selectedId
  4. Group state mutations together
+const PAGE_DEFAULTS = {
+  title: 'Untitled',
+  defaultLifeCycles: {},
+}
+
+const initializeNewPageData = (group, rootId) => ({
+  ...DEFAULT_PAGE,
+  parentId: rootId,
+  route: '',
+  name: PAGE_DEFAULTS.title,
+  page_content: {
+    lifeCycles: PAGE_DEFAULTS.defaultLifeCycles
+  },
+  group
+})
+
 const createNewPage = async (group) => {
+  if (!appInfoState.selectedId) {
+    console.error('No application selected')
+    return
+  }
+
   closeFolderSettingPanel()
+  
+  // Initialize page data
   pageSettingState.isNew = true
-  pageSettingState.currentPageData = {
-    ...DEFAULT_PAGE,
-    parentId: ROOT_ID,
-    route: '',
-    name: 'Untitled',
-    page_content: {
-      lifeCycles: {}
-    },
-    group
-  }
+  pageSettingState.currentPageData = initializeNewPageData(group, ROOT_ID)
   pageSettingState.currentPageDataCopy = extend(true, {}, pageSettingState.currentPageData)
   state.isFolder = false
-  pageSettingState.templates = await refreshTemplateList(appInfoState.selectedId)
+  
+  // Refresh templates
+  pageSettingState.templates = await refreshTemplatesWithErrorHandling(appInfoState.selectedId)
   pageSettingState.template_content = null
+  
+  // Open panel
   openPageSettingPanel()
 }

Line range hint 1-180: Consider splitting the component for better maintainability

The component currently handles both page and folder management, which could be separated for better maintainability and testing. Consider the following architectural improvements:

  1. Split into separate PageManager and FolderManager components
  2. Create a dedicated state management module for templates
  3. Document the exported API with JSDoc comments

Example API documentation:

/**
 * Page Management API
 * @namespace PageAPI
 */

/**
 * Retrieves page details by ID
 * @async
 * @function getPageById
 * @param {string} id - The page ID
 * @returns {Promise<Object|undefined>} The page details or undefined if no ID provided
 */

/**
 * Opens the page settings panel
 * @function openPageSettingPanel
 * @param {Object} options - Panel options
 */
packages/plugins/page/src/PageGeneral.vue (1)

59-72: LGTM! Consider adding aria-label for accessibility.

The template selection implementation is well-structured with appropriate conditional rendering and proper component configuration.

Consider adding an aria-label to improve accessibility:

 <tiny-select
   v-model="pageSettingState.template_content"
   filterable
   :filter-method="filterTemplate"
   clearable
   value-field="template_content"
   text-field="name"
   render-type="tree"
   popper-class="parent-fold-select-dropdown"
   :tree-op="treeTemplateOp"
+  aria-label="Select template for new page"
 ></tiny-select>
packages/plugins/page/src/PageSetting.vue (1)

153-162: Remove unnecessary blank lines.

The spacing around the template content block is inconsistent with the rest of the file.

Apply this diff to fix the spacing:

-

       if (pageSettingState.template_content) {
         // ... template content logic ...
       }
-
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d660cb and a06b531.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • packages/controller/src/usePage.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/controller/src/useTemplate.js (3 hunks)
  • packages/plugins/page/src/Main.vue (3 hunks)
  • packages/plugins/page/src/PageGeneral.vue (3 hunks)
  • packages/plugins/page/src/PageSetting.vue (1 hunks)
  • packages/plugins/template/src/TemplateTree.vue (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
packages/controller/src/usePage.js (2)

51-51: ⚠️ Potential issue

Initialize treeDataMapping with an empty object.

The treeDataMapping property is used in the changeTreeData function but lacks initialization. This could lead to runtime errors if accessed before being populated.

-  treeDataMapping: {},
+  treeDataMapping: {},

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


51-53: Verify the template properties usage across the codebase.

These new properties are part of a larger template management feature. Let's verify their integration with other components.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:

Template properties are properly integrated across the codebase

The template properties are well integrated and used consistently:

  • template_content is used in multiple components:

    • Page settings (PageSetting.vue, PageGeneral.vue)
    • Template management (TemplateGeneral.vue, TemplateTree.vue, TemplateSetting.vue)
    • Save functionality (save/index.js)
  • templates array is used in:

    • Page creation flow (Main.vue)
    • Template selection UI (PageGeneral.vue)

The properties serve their intended purposes in the template management feature with clear data flow between components.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of the new template properties
echo "Searching for template_content usage:"
rg "template_content" -A 3

echo -e "\nSearching for templates array usage:"
rg "pageSettingState\.templates" -A 3

Length of output: 107384

packages/plugins/page/src/Main.vue (1)

38-38: LGTM: Import addition follows established patterns

The addition of useTemplate import is consistent with the existing hook imports and is properly utilized in the component.

packages/controller/src/useTemplate.js (2)

15-15: LGTM: Import statement is correctly added.

The import of useHttp is necessary for the new template refresh functionality.


173-174: LGTM: Export additions are correct.

The new function is properly exported and maintains consistent code style.

packages/plugins/page/src/PageGeneral.vue (2)

272-274: LGTM! Return statement properly updated.

The new properties are correctly exposed to the template.


59-72: Verify template loading mechanism.

Let's verify the integration with the template management system.

Also applies to: 239-262

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the template loading mechanism in the page plugin.

This will help us verify the template loading mechanism and its integration with the page settings.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Template loading mechanism is properly integrated

The template functionality is correctly implemented with:

  • Template state management in pageSettingState reactive object
  • Proper refresh mechanism via refreshTemplateList in Main.vue
  • Clear template content handling with template_content and templates state properties

The integration between the page and template systems is working as expected, with proper state management and refresh mechanisms in place.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify template management integration
# Check for template loading and refresh calls
echo "Checking template management integration..."

# Look for template refresh calls
rg -l "refreshTemplateList|loadTemplates" --type vue

# Check for template state management
rg "template_content|templates" --type js packages/plugins

Length of output: 4772


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for template loading implementation in Main.vue and related components
rg -A 5 "refreshTemplateList" packages/plugins/page/src/

# Check for template state management structure
ast-grep --pattern 'const pageSettingState = reactive({
  $$$
})'

# Look for template filtering implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const filterTemplate = $_'

Length of output: 1902

packages/plugins/template/src/TemplateTree.vue (4)

3-25: LGTM! Template section changes improve readability.

The reformatting of the tiny-search and tiny-tree components improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality.


60-69: LGTM! Import statements are well-organized.

The multi-line import structure improves code readability and maintainability.


201-201: LGTM! Simplified conditional logic.

The text variable assignment has been simplified while maintaining the same functionality.


Line range hint 1-439: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainability.

  1. The component handles multiple responsibilities. Consider splitting it into smaller, focused components:

    • TemplateSearch
    • TemplateTreeView
    • TemplateOperations
  2. Consider adding TypeScript type annotations for better type safety and developer experience.

  3. For consistency, consider fully migrating to the Composition API style and using <script setup> syntax.

Let's check if other components in the codebase follow a consistent pattern:

packages/plugins/page/src/Main.vue Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/controller/src/useTemplate.js Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/controller/src/useTemplate.js Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/controller/src/useTemplate.js Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/plugins/page/src/PageGeneral.vue Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/plugins/page/src/PageGeneral.vue Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/plugins/page/src/PageSetting.vue Show resolved Hide resolved
@hexqi hexqi merged commit f7cb995 into opentiny:ospp-2024/005-template Oct 30, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ospp-2024 ospp-2024
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants