Refactored the pagination component in cypress #9163
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the integration of a new pagination helper across multiple test files, replacing the previous Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientRegistration.cy.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error: Failed to load parser '@typescript-eslint/parser' declared in '.eslintrc.json': Cannot find module '@typescript-eslint/parser'
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Deploying care-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
bddb37d
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://64f487c3.care-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://pagination-helper-function.care-fe.pages.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
cypress/pageobject/utils/paginationHelpers.ts (2)
1-13: Add TypeScript interfaces and JSDoc documentation.While the implementation is clean, adding TypeScript interfaces and JSDoc documentation would improve maintainability and provide better IDE support.
Consider applying these improvements:
+/** Interface defining pagination navigation methods */ +interface PageNavigation { + /** Navigates to the next page by clicking the next button */ + navigateToNextPage(): void; + /** Verifies the current page number in the URL + * @param pageNumber - The expected page number + */ + verifyCurrentPageNumber(pageNumber: number): void; + /** Navigates to the previous page by clicking the previous button */ + navigateToPreviousPage(): void; +} -export const pageNavigation = { +export const pageNavigation: PageNavigation = {
1-13: Consider enhancing reusability with configuration options.Since this utility is used across multiple test files, consider making it more configurable and integrating it with Cypress custom commands for better reuse.
Suggestions:
- Add configuration options for button selectors and URL patterns
- Consider registering as Cypress custom commands
- Add support for different pagination styles (e.g., infinite scroll, load more)
- Include methods for handling items per page changes
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these improvements?
cypress/e2e/assets_spec/AssetHomepage.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint
87-116: Consider additional test improvementsWhile outside the scope of this PR, consider these future improvements:
- Replace the hardcoded
cy.wait(2000)in the "Export asset" test with explicit wait conditions- Add more explicit assertions in the import/export test cases
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientHomepage.cy.ts (1)
167-175: Enhance pagination test coverage and assertions.The migration to the centralized pagination helper and addition of page number verification is good. Consider these improvements:
- Add verification for return to page 1 after
navigateToPreviousPage()- Add assertions to confirm successful navigation before comparing patients
- Consider testing edge cases (e.g., previous button disabled on page 1)
Example enhancement:
pageNavigation.navigateToNextPage(); pageNavigation.verifyCurrentPageNumber(2); cy.get('[data-cy="patient"]') .first() .invoke("text") .then((patientTwo: string) => { const firstPatientPageTwo = patientTwo.trim(); expect(firstPatientPageOne).not.to.eq(firstPatientPageTwo); pageNavigation.navigateToPreviousPage(); + pageNavigation.verifyCurrentPageNumber(1); + cy.get('[data-cy="patient"]') + .first() + .invoke("text") + .then((backToPatientOne: string) => { + expect(backToPatientOne.trim()).to.eq(firstPatientPageOne); + }); });cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (1)
174-175: LGTM! Consider adding page verificationThe pagination implementation looks good. Consider enhancing the test by verifying the current page number after navigation:
pageNavigation.navigateToNextPage(); +pageNavigation.verifyCurrentPage(2); pageNavigation.navigateToPreviousPage(); +pageNavigation.verifyCurrentPage(1);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
cypress/e2e/assets_spec/AssetHomepage.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientHomepage.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersHomepage.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Asset/AssetPagination.ts(0 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientHome.ts(0 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Users/UserSearch.ts(0 hunks)cypress/pageobject/utils/paginationHelpers.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- cypress/pageobject/Asset/AssetPagination.ts
- cypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientHome.ts
- cypress/pageobject/Users/UserSearch.ts
🔇 Additional comments (7)
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersHomepage.cy.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Clean import of the pagination helper.
The import follows the established pattern and integrates well with existing imports.
88-91: LGTM! Clean transition to centralized pagination helper.
The test maintains the same functionality while leveraging the new centralized pagination helper. Please verify that similar changes have been applied consistently across other test files that use pagination.
cypress/e2e/assets_spec/AssetHomepage.cy.ts (2)
2-2: Verify the import path configuration
The import path pageobject/utils/paginationHelpers is using a non-relative path. Ensure that your TypeScript configuration (tsconfig.json) has the correct path aliases set up for this to work correctly.
81-84: LGTM! Improved test implementation
The new implementation using pageNavigation is an improvement because it:
- Centralizes pagination logic
- Adds explicit page number verification
- Follows a clear arrange-act-assert pattern
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Good refactoring to use centralized pagination helper
The change to use pageNavigation from a dedicated helper module improves code organization and reusability.
86-89: LGTM! Improved pagination verification approach
The new implementation using verifyCurrentPageNumber is more semantic and reliable than URL verification. However, please verify that:
- The page numbers (1,2) align with your test data expectations
- The pagination helper handles edge cases (first/last page) appropriately
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientHomepage.cy.ts (1)
2-2: LGTM! Clean import of the new pagination helper.
The import statement correctly introduces the centralized pagination utility.
| navigateToNextPage() { | ||
| cy.get("button#next-pages").click(); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance navigation methods with better error handling and assertions.
The current implementation might be fragile in real-world scenarios where buttons may be disabled or not immediately available.
Consider these improvements:
navigateToNextPage() {
- cy.get("button#next-pages").click();
+ cy.get("button#next-pages")
+ .should("be.visible")
+ .should("not.be.disabled")
+ .click();
},
navigateToPreviousPage() {
- cy.get("button#prev-pages").click();
+ cy.get("button#prev-pages")
+ .should("be.visible")
+ .should("not.be.disabled")
+ .click();
},Also applies to: 10-12
| verifyCurrentPageNumber(pageNumber: number) { | ||
| cy.url().should("include", `page=${pageNumber}`); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Strengthen page number verification logic.
The current URL verification might miss edge cases or provide false positives.
Consider a more robust implementation:
verifyCurrentPageNumber(pageNumber: number) {
- cy.url().should("include", `page=${pageNumber}`);
+ cy.url().then((url) => {
+ const params = new URLSearchParams(new URL(url).search);
+ const currentPage = parseInt(params.get("page") || "1", 10);
+ expect(currentPage).to.equal(pageNumber);
+ });
+ // Optionally verify the active state in pagination UI
+ cy.get(`[data-testid="page-${pageNumber}"]`)
+ .should("have.attr", "aria-current", "page");
},Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | |||
| import { pageNavigation } from "pageobject/utils/paginationHelpers"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the import path to use relative notation
The import path should be relative to the current file's location. Update it to use the proper relative path notation.
-import { pageNavigation } from "pageobject/utils/paginationHelpers";
+import { pageNavigation } from "../../pageobject/utils/paginationHelpers";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { pageNavigation } from "pageobject/utils/paginationHelpers"; | |
| import { pageNavigation } from "../../pageobject/utils/paginationHelpers"; |
CARE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
CARE
|
| Branch Review |
pagination-helper-function
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 04m 52s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Mohammed Nihal |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
129
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
cypress/e2e/hcx_spec/HcxClaims.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-109: LGTM! Consider these minor improvementsThe test structure is well-organized with proper page object usage, setup/teardown, and API mocking. Consider these enhancements:
- Extract the URL regex pattern to a constant for reusability
- Add explicit type annotation for the
consultationIdvariable- Consider moving the mock response data to a fixture file
Example improvements:
// At the top of the file const CONSULTATION_URL_PATTERN = /facility\/([^/]+)\/patient\/([^/]+)\/consultation\/([^/]+)/; // In the test let consultationId: string; cy.url().then((url) => { const match = url.match(CONSULTATION_URL_PATTERN); if (match) { consultationId = match[3]; } });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cypress/e2e/hcx_spec/HcxClaims.cy.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cypress/e2e/hcx_spec/HcxClaims.cy.ts (1)
14-14: Verify test data consistency across the test suite
The patient name change from "Dummy Patient 14" to "Dummy Patient Fourteen" looks good for readability, but please ensure this test data update is synchronized across all relevant test files and test data fixtures to maintain consistency.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationDischarge.cy.ts (3)
34-34: LGTM! Consider enhancing test coverage.The descriptive patient identifier improves test readability. However, consider adding assertions for:
- Verification of patient state in the system
- Validation of audit trail/history
70-70: Consider improving test stability.While the patient identifier change improves clarity, the test could benefit from:
- Using Cypress route aliases instead of arbitrary waits
- Adding retry-ability for facility selection
// Instead of cy.wait(2000), consider: cy.intercept('POST', '/api/facility/**').as('facilityUpdate') // ... facility selection code ... cy.wait('@facilityUpdate')
96-96: Consider refactoring for better maintainability.While the patient identifier change is good, this test case could benefit from:
- Breaking down the prescription steps into a shared command
- Replacing fixed waits with proper network request handling
- Adding retry strategies for UI interactions
Example shared command:
// In commands.ts Cypress.Commands.add('prescribeMedicine', (medicine, dosage, frequency) => { cy.intercept('POST', '/api/medibase/**').as('medibaseRequest') // ... prescription steps ... cy.wait('@medibaseRequest') }) // In test cy.prescribeMedicine(patientMedicine, "4", "Twice daily")cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationCreation.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-424: Consider architectural improvements for better test maintainability.While the test cases are comprehensive, consider the following improvements:
- Extract test data (e.g., patient names, facility names, diagnosis codes) into a centralized fixture file
- Create shared custom commands for common verification steps
- Consider using TypeScript enums for consultation statuses and patient categories instead of magic strings
These changes would improve maintainability and reduce duplication across test files.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
cypress/e2e/hcx_spec/HcxClaims.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientBedManagement.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationCreation.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationDischarge.cy.ts(4 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientDoctorConnect.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientDoctorNotes.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientFileUpload.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientInvestigation.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientLogUpdate.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientPrescription.cy.ts(4 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientRegistration.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/e2e/sample_test_spec/SampleTestRequest.cy.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientFileUpload.ts
- cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientLogUpdate.cy.ts
- cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientPrescription.cy.ts
- cypress/e2e/sample_test_spec/SampleTestRequest.cy.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- cypress/e2e/hcx_spec/HcxClaims.cy.ts
🔇 Additional comments (11)
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientInvestigation.cy.ts (2)
10-10: LGTM: Patient name standardization
The change from "Dummy Patient 14" to "Dummy Patient Thirteen" aligns with the broader effort to standardize patient names across test files.
Line range hint 24-35: Test implementation needs completion
The test appears to be incomplete:
- The comment "Temporary workflow for investigation since we dont have dummy data and moving away from existing module" needs more context about the planned changes
- The test only verifies the error case but doesn't validate successful investigation creation
Consider either:
- Completing the test implementation with proper validation
- Adding a TODO with specific requirements
- Or if this is intentionally partial, document why in the test description
Would you like help in implementing a complete test case for successful investigation creation?
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientBedManagement.cy.ts (2)
14-15: LGTM! Verify test data consistency.
The patient name standardization from numeric to word format looks good. Please ensure these updated names match the test data setup in your test environment.
Line range hint 1-58: Verify PR scope and description.
The PR description mentions pagination component refactoring, but this file only contains patient name standardization changes. Consider updating the PR description to accurately reflect all the changes being made.
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientDoctorConnect.cy.ts (2)
10-10: LGTM! Name standardization is consistent with the broader refactoring effort.
The change from numeric to word form ("Dummy Patient 11" → "Dummy Patient Eleven") aligns with the standardization being implemented across the test suite.
10-10: Verify test data consistency.
Please ensure that this patient name change is reflected in any associated test data setup, fixtures, or database seeds that might be used for this test case.
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientDoctorNotes.cy.ts (1)
9-9: LGTM: Consistent naming convention update
The change from numeric to word form aligns with the standardization effort across test files.
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationDischarge.cy.ts (1)
50-50: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.
The test case thoroughly validates the expired patient discharge workflow, including required fields and UI state verification.
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientRegistration.cy.ts (2)
67-67: LGTM! Name format standardization looks good.
The changes consistently update the patient name format from numeric ("Dummy Patient 10") to word format ("Dummy Patient Ten") across both the variable declaration and notification message verification.
Also applies to: 246-246
Line range hint 1-275: Verify PR objectives alignment.
The changes in this file appear to be name format standardization, but the PR objectives mention a pagination component refactor. Please clarify if there are additional changes pending or if the PR description needs to be updated to accurately reflect these changes.
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationCreation.cy.ts (1)
378-378: LGTM! Verify test data consistency.
The change from "Dummy Patient 13" to "Dummy Patient Thirteen" aligns with the standardization of patient naming conventions across test files. However, ensure that:
- This test patient exists in the test data setup
- Other test files referencing this patient have been updated accordingly
|
@nihal467 Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
pageNavigationutility, improving code organization.