Refactor Facility Homepage Advance Filters Cypress Test #9105
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request focus on refactoring the advanced filtering functionality across various Cypress test files. A new utility object, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error: Failed to load parser '@typescript-eslint/parser' declared in '.eslintrc.json': Cannot find module '@typescript-eslint/parser'
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Deploying care-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
7850052
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://b2d9e5d3.care-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://refactor-advancefilter.care-fe.pages.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
cypress/pageobject/utils/advanceFilterHelpers.ts (4)
1-29: Consider adding TypeScript interfaces for better type safetyThe utility object is well-structured, but could benefit from explicit TypeScript interfaces to improve maintainability and type safety.
Consider adding an interface:
interface AdvanceFilters { clickAdvancedFiltersButton(): void; selectState(state: string): void; selectDistrict(district: string): void; selectLocalBody(localBody: string): void; applySelectedFilter(): void; selectFacilityType(facilityType: string): void; clickClearAdvanceFilters(): void; } export const advanceFilters: AdvanceFilters = { // ... existing implementation };
2-4: Consider using more specific selectorsUsing ID selectors is good, but consider using data-testid attributes for better test maintainability and to avoid conflicts with styling-related IDs.
- cy.verifyAndClickElement("#advanced-filter", "Advanced Filters"); + cy.verifyAndClickElement("[data-testid=advanced-filter-button]", "Advanced Filters");
1-29: Add tests for the utility methodsConsider adding tests for these utility methods to ensure they behave correctly across different scenarios.
Would you like me to help create a test file with example test cases for these utility methods? This could include:
- Testing successful filter applications
- Testing error scenarios
- Testing hierarchical dependencies
- Testing clear filter functionality
1-29: Add JSDoc documentation for better maintainabilityConsider adding comprehensive JSDoc comments to improve code maintainability and usage understanding.
Example documentation:
/** * Utility object for managing advanced filters in facility-related tests */ export const advanceFilters = { /** * Clicks the advanced filters button to expand filter options * @example * advanceFilters.clickAdvancedFiltersButton(); */ clickAdvancedFiltersButton() { // ... implementation }, /** * Selects a state from the state dropdown * @param state - The name of the state to select * @throws {Error} If the state is not found in the dropdown * @example * advanceFilters.selectState("California"); */ selectState(state: string) { // ... implementation }, // ... other methods };cypress/e2e/shifting_spec/ShiftingAdvanceFilters.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint
20-57: Consider further centralization of filter operationsWhile the advanced filter button click has been centralized, the individual filtering operations (facility, category, date) are still using page-specific methods. Consider extending the
advanceFiltersutility to handle these common filtering patterns as well.This would improve maintainability and reduce duplication across different page objects. For example:
// In advanceFilterHelpers.ts export const advanceFilters = { // ... existing methods filterByFacility: (name: string, type: string, level: string) => { // Common implementation }, filterByDate: (startDate: string, endDate: string, modifiedStart: string, modifiedEnd: string) => { // Common implementation } };cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersHomepage.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint
33-60: Consider further refactoring for consistencyThe test currently mixes direct
userPagecalls withadvanceFiltersutility methods. Consider moving all filter-related actions (liketypeInFirstName,selectRole, etc.) to theadvanceFiltersutility for better consistency and maintainability.Example refactoring:
- userPage.typeInFirstName(firstName); - userPage.typeInLastName(lastName); - userPage.selectRole(role); + advanceFilters.setFirstName(firstName); + advanceFilters.setLastName(lastName); + advanceFilters.selectRole(role);cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts (2)
Line range hint
67-68: Replace hardcoded wait with proper wait strategy.The comment "temporary hack to fix the failure" with
cy.wait(5000)could make tests flaky. Consider using Cypress's built-in retry-ability:- cy.wait(5000); // temporary hack to fix the failure + // Wait for the specific condition that the hack was trying to handle + cy.get('[data-testid="linked-skills"]').should('exist');
Line range hint
8-186: Consider restructuring tests for better maintainability.The test file could benefit from several improvements:
- Break down large test cases into smaller, focused ones following the Single Responsibility Principle
- Extract common patterns into shared helper functions
- Use before/beforeEach hooks more effectively to reduce setup duplication
- Consider using custom Cypress commands for common operations
Example structure:
describe('User Skills Management', () => { describe('Linking Skills', () => { it('should link a skill to a user') it('should reflect linked skill in user profile') }) describe('Working Hours', () => { it('should validate working hours input') it('should update working hours') it('should reflect working hours in profile') }) })cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientHomepage.cy.ts (2)
40-40: Consider further refactoring opportunities for filter-related methods.While the
clickAdvancedFiltersButton()has been standardized using the newadvanceFiltersutility, other filter-related methods (e.g.,typePatientCreatedBeforeDate,selectFacilityType, etc.) are still using the page object directly. Consider moving these methods to theadvanceFiltersutility for better consistency and reusability.Also applies to: 60-60, 78-78, 108-108, 120-120
Line range hint
40-57: Consider improving test maintainability and readability.A few suggestions to enhance the test suite:
- Extract repeated verification patterns into custom commands or helper methods
- Move hardcoded test data (e.g., "Dummy Facility 40", "01122023") to test fixtures or constants
- Consider using data-driven tests for different filter combinations
Example custom command for filter verification:
// In commands.ts Cypress.Commands.add('verifyAndClearFilters', (expectedCount: string) => { cy.clearAllFilters(); cy.get('[data-cy="patient-count"]').should('contain', expectedCount); });Also applies to: 60-75, 78-117, 120-145
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts (3)
60-60: LGTM! Consider centralizing test constants.Moving the hardcoded facility type to a constant improves maintainability. If there are more similar constants across test files, consider moving them to a separate constants file.
289-289: LGTM! Consider enhancing update verification.The facility type selection is correctly implemented in the update scenario. Consider adding assertions to verify that the facility type was actually updated.
facilityPage.submitForm(); cy.url().should("not.include", "/update"); +// Add assertion to verify facility type update +facilityPage.getFacilityType().should("contain", facilityType);
Line range hint
1-324: Consider enhancing test organization and coverage.While the test file is well-structured, consider these improvements:
- Move test constants to a separate file for better reusability across test files
- Add more assertions to verify facility type updates
- Consider using test data builders or factories to reduce test setup duplication
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
cypress/e2e/assets_spec/AssetHomepage.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts(5 hunks)cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts(3 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientHomepage.cy.ts(6 hunks)cypress/e2e/shifting_spec/ShiftingAdvanceFilters.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersHomepage.cy.ts(4 hunks)cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Asset/AssetFilters.ts(0 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityCreation.ts(2 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientHome.ts(0 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Shift/ShiftFilters.ts(0 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Users/UserSearch.ts(0 hunks)cypress/pageobject/utils/advanceFilterHelpers.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- cypress/pageobject/Asset/AssetFilters.ts
- cypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientHome.ts
- cypress/pageobject/Shift/ShiftFilters.ts
- cypress/pageobject/Users/UserSearch.ts
🔇 Additional comments (20)
cypress/pageobject/utils/advanceFilterHelpers.ts (1)
1-29: Verify complete migration to new utility methods
Ensure all existing test files have been updated to use these new utility methods consistently.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual content of these files to verify if they are using the old methods or have already been migrated.
Migration to new utility methods is complete
All files are already using the new advanceFilters utility methods consistently. No instances of old method names or direct selector usage were found in the test files. The implementation appears to be properly migrated across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining direct usage of the old selectors
rg -l "(#advanced-filter|#state|#district|#local_body|#facility_type)" cypress/e2e/
# Search for any remaining old method names that should have been migrated
rg -l "clickadvancefilter|clickUpdateFacilityType|clickPatientAdvanceFilters|clickAdvancedFilters" cypress/e2e/
Length of output: 478
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the files to see actual usage
for file in cypress/e2e/shifting_spec/ShiftingAdvanceFilters.cy.ts \
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersHomepage.cy.ts \
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts \
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientHomepage.cy.ts \
cypress/e2e/assets_spec/AssetHomepage.cy.ts \
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 2 "(#advanced-filter|#state|#district|#local_body|#facility_type|clickadvancefilter|clickUpdateFacilityType|clickPatientAdvanceFilters|clickAdvancedFilters)" "$file"
done
Length of output: 5501
cypress/e2e/shifting_spec/ShiftingAdvanceFilters.cy.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM: Clean import structure
The addition of the advanceFilters utility import maintains good separation of concerns while keeping the existing page object import.
17-17: Verify consistent behavior across all filter scenarios
The switch to the centralized advanceFilters utility looks good. However, since this is a core setup step for all test cases, we should verify that the new utility method behaves identically to the previous implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Advanced filters implementation is consistent and properly centralized
The verification shows that:
- The
clickAdvancedFiltersButtonis implemented in a centralized utility atcypress/pageobject/utils/advanceFilterHelpers.ts - It uses a consistent selector
#advanced-filterwith proper verification - All test files are using this centralized implementation
- No old/direct button click implementations remain
The new utility method is being used consistently across all filter scenarios in different test suites (shifting, users, patients, assets, facility), and the implementation is properly abstracted using Cypress's built-in commands.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of the new advanceFilters utility across test files
# and verify no old implementation remains
# Check for any remaining direct usage of advancedFilterButton
rg -l "advancedFilterButton\(\)\.click\(\)" "cypress/e2e"
# Check adoption of new utility method
rg -l "advanceFilters\.clickAdvancedFiltersButton" "cypress/e2e"
Length of output: 401
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of clickAdvancedFiltersButton in these files
# to ensure consistent behavior
# First, let's see the actual implementation of the utility method
rg -A 5 "clickAdvancedFiltersButton" "cypress/support" "cypress/pages"
# Then check how it's being used in test files
rg -B 2 -A 2 "clickAdvancedFiltersButton" "cypress/e2e"
Length of output: 5888
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the actual implementation of advanceFilters
# since it wasn't found in cypress/pages
# Search for the advanceFilters class/object definition
rg -A 10 "class.*advanceFilters|const.*advanceFilters" "cypress"
# Also check for any potential old implementations
rg -A 5 "advancedFilterButton" "cypress"
Length of output: 955
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersHomepage.cy.ts (3)
Line range hint 33-42: LGTM! Good refactoring of filter actions
The delegation of filter actions to the advanceFilters utility improves code organization and maintainability while maintaining the original test behavior.
Line range hint 60-67: LGTM! Clear filter refactoring looks good
The clear filter functionality has been successfully moved to the advanceFilters utility while maintaining all necessary verifications.
1-1: Verify the import path exists
The import of the new advanceFilters utility aligns with the refactoring goals. Let's verify the import path is correct.
✅ Verification successful
Import path is correctly configured
The import path pageobject/utils/advanceFilterHelpers is valid as the file exists at cypress/pageobject/utils/advanceFilterHelpers.ts relative to the repository root.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the advanceFilterHelpers file
fd "advanceFilterHelpers.ts" --type f
Length of output: 86
cypress/e2e/assets_spec/AssetHomepage.cy.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import statement follows best practices.
The new import for advanceFilters is correctly placed and properly structured.
67-77: Enhance test coverage for filter functionality.
The current test verifies filter UI elements but lacks verification of the actual filtering results:
- Add assertions to verify filtered data:
it("should apply filters to asset list", () => {
// Existing filter application
cy.get('[data-testid="asset-list"]').within(() => {
cy.get('[data-testid="asset-item"]').each(($el) => {
cy.wrap($el).should('contain', 'Dummy Facility 40')
.and('contain', 'ACTIVE')
.and('contain', 'ONVIF Camera');
});
});
});- Add negative test cases:
it("should handle invalid filter combinations gracefully", () => {
// Test with non-existent facility
// Test with incompatible asset class for facility
// Test with invalid status
});Let's verify the current test coverage:
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Clean import organization.
The new import follows good practices by:
- Properly organizing utilities in a dedicated folder
- Maintaining clear separation between utility and page object imports
60-63: LGTM! Verify consistent usage of advanceFilters utility.
The refactoring to use the centralized advanceFilters utility looks good. However, let's ensure consistency across all test cases.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual usage in these files to determine if there are inconsistencies.
Let me check for any instances of applyFilter to ensure we haven't missed any occurrences that should be using applySelectedFilter.
Let me check for the new applySelectedFilter method to ensure it's being used consistently.
The refactoring is consistently applied across test files
Based on the verification results, both UsersHomepage.cy.ts and UsersManage.cy.ts are consistently using the new advanceFilters utility with clickAdvancedFiltersButton() and applySelectedFilter() methods. No instances of the old methods were found, confirming the refactoring was thorough.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining direct filter interactions that should use the utility
rg -l "clickAdvancedFilters|applyFilter|clearFilters" "cypress/e2e/users_spec/"
Length of output: 163
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual usage of these methods in both files
rg "clickAdvancedFilters|applyFilter|clearFilters" "cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts" "cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersHomepage.cy.ts" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 1113
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search specifically for applyFilter variations
rg "applyFilter" "cypress/e2e/users_spec/" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 50
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for applySelectedFilter
rg "applySelectedFilter" "cypress/e2e/users_spec/" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 951
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts (3)
9-9: LGTM: Clean import of the new utility.
The import follows the established pattern and is correctly referenced.
65-70: LGTM: Clean refactoring to use centralized filter utility.
The migration to advanceFilters utility improves code organization by centralizing filter operations while maintaining clear verification steps.
121-125: LGTM: Consistent implementation of filter operations.
The refactoring maintains consistency with the previous usage pattern and preserves test readability.
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientHomepage.cy.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Import changes align with the refactoring effort.
The addition of the advanceFilters utility import is consistent with the refactoring goals.
Line range hint 40-145: Verify error handling for filter operations.
The tests should verify error scenarios such as:
- Invalid date ranges
- Invalid age ranges
- Non-existent facility names
- Network failures during filter operations
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts (2)
121-121: LGTM! Method name better reflects its purpose.
The updated method name selectFacilityType better describes the action being performed compared to the previous clickUpdateFacilityType.
210-210: LGTM! Consistent usage across test scenarios.
The facility type selection is consistently implemented across different facility creation scenarios, maintaining good test structure.
Also applies to: 250-250
cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityCreation.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM! Good practice to centralize advanced filter functionality.
The import of advanceFilters utility aligns with the refactoring goal of centralizing filter-related functionality, improving maintainability.
17-19: LGTM! Clean delegation to the utility method.
The implementation follows good practices by:
- Providing a clean interface to the underlying utility
- Following the single responsibility principle
Line range hint 1-22: Verify complete migration to advanceFilters utility.
Several methods were removed as part of this refactoring. Let's verify that all removed methods are properly handled by the advanceFilters utility and that there are no remaining references to the removed methods.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to removed methods
echo "Searching for references to removed methods..."
rg -t ts "clickUpdateFacilityType|selectState|selectDistrict|selectLocalBody" cypress/
# Verify the implementation of corresponding methods in advanceFilters
echo "Verifying advanceFilters implementation..."
rg -t ts "selectFacilityType|selectState|selectDistrict|selectLocalBody" cypress/pageobject/utils/advanceFilterHelpers.ts| selectState(state: string) { | ||
| cy.clickAndSelectOption("#state", state); | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| selectDistrict(district: string) { | ||
| cy.clickAndSelectOption("#district", district); | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| selectLocalBody(localBody: string) { | ||
| cy.clickAndSelectOption("#local_body", localBody); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for hierarchical filter dependencies
The state, district, and local body selections are hierarchically dependent, but the methods don't verify if the parent selection exists before allowing child selection.
Consider implementing validation:
selectDistrict(district: string) {
// Verify state is selected before allowing district selection
cy.get("#state").should("have.value.not.eq", "");
cy.clickAndSelectOption("#district", district);
},
selectLocalBody(localBody: string) {
// Verify district is selected before allowing local body selection
cy.get("#district").should("have.value.not.eq", "");
cy.clickAndSelectOption("#local_body", localBody);
},| export const advanceFilters = { | ||
| clickAdvancedFiltersButton() { | ||
| cy.verifyAndClickElement("#advanced-filter", "Advanced Filters"); | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| selectState(state: string) { | ||
| cy.clickAndSelectOption("#state", state); | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| selectDistrict(district: string) { | ||
| cy.clickAndSelectOption("#district", district); | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| selectLocalBody(localBody: string) { | ||
| cy.clickAndSelectOption("#local_body", localBody); | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| applySelectedFilter() { | ||
| cy.verifyAndClickElement("#apply-filter", "Apply"); | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| selectFacilityType(facilityType: string) { | ||
| cy.clickAndSelectOption("#local_body", facilityType); | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| clickClearAdvanceFilters() { | ||
| cy.verifyAndClickElement("#clear-filter", "Clear"); | ||
| }, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and timeout management
The methods should handle common test scenarios like failed selections or slow-loading dropdowns.
Consider adding timeout and error handling:
selectState(state: string) {
cy.get("#state", { timeout: 10000 })
.should("be.visible")
.then($select => {
if ($select.find(`option:contains("${state}")`).length === 0) {
throw new Error(`State "${state}" not found in dropdown`);
}
cy.clickAndSelectOption("#state", state);
});
},| selectFacilityType(facilityType: string) { | ||
| cy.clickAndSelectOption("#local_body", facilityType); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect selector in selectFacilityType method
The method is currently using the wrong selector (#local_body) which is meant for local body selection. This will cause the facility type selection to fail.
- cy.clickAndSelectOption("#local_body", facilityType);
+ cy.clickAndSelectOption("#facility_type", facilityType);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| selectFacilityType(facilityType: string) { | |
| cy.clickAndSelectOption("#local_body", facilityType); | |
| }, | |
| selectFacilityType(facilityType: string) { | |
| cy.clickAndSelectOption("#facility_type", facilityType); | |
| }, |
| advanceFilters.clickAdvancedFiltersButton(); | ||
| assetFilters.clickslideoverbackbutton(); // to verify the back button doesn't clear applied filters | ||
| assetFilters.assertFacilityText("Dummy Facility 40"); | ||
| assetFilters.assertAssetClassText("ONVIF"); | ||
| assetFilters.assertStatusText("ACTIVE"); | ||
| assetFilters.assertLocationText("Camera Loc"); | ||
| assetFilters.clickadvancefilter(); | ||
| advanceFilters.clickAdvancedFiltersButton(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve test maintainability and reliability.
While the refactoring to use advanceFilters is good, there are several areas for improvement:
- Standardize method naming conventions:
- assetFilters.clickslideoverbackbutton();
+ assetFilters.clickSlidingPanelBackButton();- Extract test data to constants or fixtures:
+ const TEST_FILTERS = {
+ facility: "Dummy Facility 40",
+ status: "ACTIVE",
+ assetClass: "ONVIF Camera",
+ location: "Camera Loc"
+ };
assetFilters.filterAssets(
- "Dummy Facility 40",
- "ACTIVE",
- "ONVIF Camera",
- "Camera Loc",
+ TEST_FILTERS.facility,
+ TEST_FILTERS.status,
+ TEST_FILTERS.assetClass,
+ TEST_FILTERS.location,
);- Add explicit waits for filter operations:
advanceFilters.clickAdvancedFiltersButton();
+ cy.wait('@getFilteredAssets'); // Add corresponding route intercept
assetFilters.clickSlidingPanelBackButton();- Split the test into smaller, focused test cases:
it("should persist filters after closing sliding panel", () => {
// Test filter persistence
});
it("should display correct filter badges", () => {
// Test filter badges
});
it("should clear all filters", () => {
// Test filter clearing
});| facilityPage.verifyStateBadgeContent(stateName); | ||
| facilityPage.verifyDistrictBadgeContent(district); | ||
| facilityPage.verifyLocalBodyBadgeContent(localBody); | ||
| facilityPage.verifyFacilityTypeBadgeContent(facilityType); | ||
| manageUserPage.assertFacilityInCard(facilityName); | ||
| userPage.clearFilters(); | ||
| advanceFilters.applySelectedFilter(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant filter application.
This line appears to be a duplicate call to applySelectedFilter() which was already called on line 70.
- advanceFilters.applySelectedFilter();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| advanceFilters.applySelectedFilter(); |
| @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ | |||
| import LoginPage from "../../pageobject/Login/LoginPage"; | |||
| import ManageUserPage from "../../pageobject/Users/ManageUserPage"; | |||
| import { UserPage } from "../../pageobject/Users/UserSearch"; | |||
| import { advanceFilters } from "../../pageobject/utils/advanceFilterHelpers"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response:
Migration to advanceFilters utility is incomplete
Several components still contain direct filter operations that should be migrated to the centralized utility:
cypress/pageobject/Users/UserSearch.ts: Contains direct implementations ofselectStateandselectDistrictcypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientHome.ts: Contains direct implementation ofselectFacilityTypecypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityCreation.ts: Contains multiple direct filter operations includingselectFacilityType,selectStateOnPincode,selectDistrictOnPincode
These implementations should be migrated to the advanceFilterHelpers utility to maintain consistency and reduce code duplication.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify test coverage and migration completeness.
Since this is part of a larger refactoring effort to standardize filter operations, let's verify:
- Test coverage for the new
advanceFiltersutility - Any remaining direct filter operations that should be migrated
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for test coverage and remaining direct filter operations
# Check for test coverage of the new utility
echo "Checking for test coverage of advanceFilterHelpers..."
rg -l "advanceFilterHelpers" cypress/e2e/**/*spec.ts
# Look for potential remaining direct filter operations that should be migrated
echo "Checking for potential remaining direct filter operations..."
rg -A 2 "clickAdvancedFilters|selectState|selectDistrict|selectLocalBody|selectFacilityType" \
--type ts \
--glob '!**/advanceFilterHelpers.ts' \
--glob '!**/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts'
Length of output: 9046
| advanceFilters.selectFacilityType(facility); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| selectLocalBody; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Critical: Implement selectLocalBody method to match its usage in tests
The incomplete selectLocalBody declaration in FacilityCreation.ts needs implementation as it's actively used in multiple test files:
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientRegistration.cy.tscypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientPredefined.tscypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts
Implement it to delegate to advanceFilters.selectLocalBody() which exists in cypress/pageobject/utils/advanceFilterHelpers.ts:
- selectLocalBody;
+ selectLocalBody(localBody: string) {
+ advanceFilters.selectLocalBody(localBody);
+ }🔗 Analysis chain
Critical: Incomplete method declaration needs implementation.
The selectLocalBody declaration appears to be incomplete, which could lead to runtime errors if called. This seems to be part of the refactoring where the original method was removed.
Let's verify the usage of this method in tests:
Consider one of these implementations based on your needs:
- selectLocalBody;
+ selectLocalBody(localBody: string) {
+ advanceFilters.selectLocalBody(localBody);
+ }Or remove it if it's no longer needed:
- selectLocalBody;🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for calls to selectLocalBody in test files
rg -t ts "selectLocalBody" cypress/e2e/
Length of output: 3440
CARE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
CARE
|
| Branch Review |
refactor-advancefilter
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 04m 45s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Mohammed Nihal |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
126
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts (2)
76-77: Optimize filter clearing operationThe advanced filters button is clicked again just to clear the filters. Consider removing this redundant step since the filters panel should already be open from the previous operations.
- advanceFilters.clickAdvancedFiltersButton(); advanceFilters.clickClearAdvanceFilters();
9-9: Track remaining filter migration workWhile this file successfully implements the new
advanceFiltersutility, there are still components that need migration:
cypress/pageobject/Users/UserSearch.tscypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientHome.tscypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityCreation.tsConsider creating tracking issues for migrating these components to maintain consistency across the codebase.
Would you like me to create GitHub issues to track the remaining migration work?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts(3 hunks)cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersHomepage.cy.ts(4 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityCreation.ts(2 hunks)cypress/pageobject/utils/advanceFilterHelpers.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersHomepage.cy.ts
- cypress/pageobject/utils/advanceFilterHelpers.ts
🔇 Additional comments (6)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts (3)
9-9: LGTM! Import of centralized filter utility
The import of advanceFilters aligns with the PR objective of centralizing filter operations.
65-70: LGTM! Well-structured filter application sequence
The filter application follows a clear and logical sequence using the new centralized utility.
121-125: LGTM! Consistent filter implementation
The filter application follows the same pattern established earlier, maintaining consistency throughout the test file.
cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityCreation.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement aligns with refactoring goals
The import of advanceFilters from the helper file supports the PR objective of moving advance filters to a dedicated helper.
21-23: LGTM: Implements selectLocalBody as suggested
The implementation correctly delegates to the helper function and addresses the past review comment about implementing selectLocalBody.
17-19: Verify usage of new selectFacilityType method
The method correctly delegates to the helper function and improves naming clarity over the old clickUpdateFacilityType.
✅ Verification successful
Method migration is complete and consistent
The verification shows that:
- No instances of the old
clickUpdateFacilityTypemethod remain in the codebase - The new
selectFacilityTypemethod is properly used across multiple test files and page objects - The implementation is consistent with the string parameter type across all usages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all occurrences of clickUpdateFacilityType have been replaced with selectFacilityType
# Search for any remaining usage of old method
echo "Checking for any remaining usage of clickUpdateFacilityType:"
rg "clickUpdateFacilityType"
# Search for usage of new method to confirm migration
echo "Checking usage of new selectFacilityType method:"
rg "selectFacilityType"
Length of output: 1256
|
@nihal467 Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor