Disallow picking out of range month or year in date input dropdown #9064
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint (1.23.1)
cypress.config.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error: Failed to load parser '@typescript-eslint/parser' declared in '.eslintrc.json': Cannot find module '@typescript-eslint/parser'
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/Common/DateInputV2.tsx (3)
221-272: Enhance month validation error handlingThe month validation logic is thorough but could be simplified to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
Consider consolidating the validation logic:
const setMonthValue = (month: number) => () => { const selectedMonthDate = new Date( datePickerHeaderDate.getFullYear(), month, 1, ); - if (min && selectedMonthDate < min) { - Notification.Error({ - msg: - outOfLimitsErrorMessage ?? - "Cannot select month before the allowed date", - }); - return; - } - - if (max && selectedMonthDate > max) { - Notification.Error({ - msg: - outOfLimitsErrorMessage ?? - "Cannot select month after the allowed date", - }); - return; - } + const isBeforeMin = min && selectedMonthDate < min; + const isAfterMax = max && selectedMonthDate > max; + + if (isBeforeMin || isAfterMax) { + Notification.Error({ + msg: outOfLimitsErrorMessage ?? + `Cannot select month ${isBeforeMin ? 'before' : 'after'} the allowed date`, + }); + return; + }
410-470: Simplify navigation button disabled statesThe disabled state logic is duplicated across different button types with similar validation.
Consider extracting the common validation logic:
+ const isNavigationDisabled = (type: 'date' | 'month' | 'year', direction: 'prev' | 'next') => { + const monthOffset = direction === 'prev' ? -1 : 1; + const yearOffset = type === 'date' ? 0 : (direction === 'prev' ? -1 : 1); + + return !isDateWithinConstraints( + getLastDay(), + datePickerHeaderDate.getMonth() + monthOffset, + datePickerHeaderDate.getFullYear() + yearOffset + ); + }; // Then use it in the buttons: disabled={isNavigationDisabled(type, 'prev')}
588-627: Improve month selection accessibilityThe month selection implementation could benefit from improved accessibility.
Add ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation:
<div key={i} id={`month-${i}`} + role="button" + tabIndex={isDisabled ? -1 : 0} + aria-disabled={isDisabled} + aria-label={`Select ${dayjs(new Date(datePickerHeaderDate.getFullYear(), i, 1)).format("MMMM")}`} + onKeyDown={(e) => { + if (e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === ' ') { + e.preventDefault(); + if (!isDisabled) { + setMonthValue(i)(); + } + } + }} className={classNames( // ... existing classes )} >
| setYear((prev) => { | ||
| const newYear = dayjs(prev).subtract(10, "year").year(); | ||
| if (newYear >= new Date().getFullYear() - 10) { | ||
| return dayjs(prev).subtract(10, "year").toDate(); | ||
| } | ||
| return prev; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve year decrement validation logic
The current implementation has a potential issue where it only checks against a hardcoded 10-year limit, ignoring the min prop that could be passed to the component.
Consider updating the logic to use the min prop:
setYear((prev) => {
const newYear = dayjs(prev).subtract(10, "year").year();
- if (newYear >= new Date().getFullYear() - 10) {
+ const minYear = min ? min.getFullYear() : new Date().getFullYear() - 10;
+ if (newYear >= minYear) {
return dayjs(prev).subtract(10, "year").toDate();
}
return prev;
});Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| if (min && new Date(year, datePickerHeaderDate.getMonth(), 1) < min) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| if (max && new Date(year, datePickerHeaderDate.getMonth(), 1) > max) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error notification for year validation
The year validation silently fails when out of range, which might confuse users.
Add error notifications for better user feedback:
const setYearValue = (year: number) => () => {
+ const selectedYearDate = new Date(year, datePickerHeaderDate.getMonth(), 1);
+
+ if (min && selectedYearDate < min) {
+ Notification.Error({
+ msg: outOfLimitsErrorMessage ?? "Cannot select year before the allowed date",
+ });
return;
}
+ if (max && selectedYearDate > max) {
+ Notification.Error({
+ msg: outOfLimitsErrorMessage ?? "Cannot select year after the allowed date",
+ });
return;
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
|
@Rishith25 hoding this PR test , a related issue need to be solved and merge before we test this : #9101 |
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/Common/DateInputV2.tsx (1)
656-685: Consider making the year range configurableThe implementation uses a fixed range of 11 years before the current year. Consider making this range configurable through props to support different use cases.
+ yearRange?: number; // Add to Props interface - const y = year.getFullYear() - 11 + i; + const range = props.yearRange ?? 11; + const y = year.getFullYear() - range + i;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/Common/DateInputV2.tsx(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/components/Common/DateInputV2.tsx (4)
223-274: LGTM! Comprehensive month validation implementation
The implementation properly validates month selection against min/max constraints and provides clear error messages to users.
428-488: LGTM! Robust navigation button validation
The implementation properly validates navigation buttons for all date types (date/month/year) and prevents navigation to invalid dates.
606-647: LGTM! Well-implemented month selection UI with validation
The implementation provides clear visual feedback for disabled months and proper error handling for invalid selections.
278-283: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error notifications for year validation
The year validation silently fails when out of range, which might confuse users. Consider adding error notifications for consistency with month validation.
if (min && new Date(year, datePickerHeaderDate.getMonth(), 1) < min) {
+ Notification.Error({
+ msg: outOfLimitsErrorMessage ?? "Cannot select year before the allowed date",
+ });
return;
}
if (max && new Date(year, datePickerHeaderDate.getMonth(), 1) > max) {
+ Notification.Error({
+ msg: outOfLimitsErrorMessage ?? "Cannot select year after the allowed date",
+ });
return;
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| setYear((prev) => { | ||
| const newYear = dayjs(prev).subtract(1, "year").year(); | ||
| if (newYear >= new Date().getFullYear() - 10) { | ||
| return dayjs(prev).subtract(10, "year").toDate(); | ||
| } | ||
| return prev; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider min date constraint in year decrement logic
The current implementation only checks against a hardcoded 10-year limit, ignoring the min prop. This could allow selecting years before the minimum allowed date.
setYear((prev) => {
const newYear = dayjs(prev).subtract(1, "year").year();
- if (newYear >= new Date().getFullYear() - 10) {
+ const minYear = min ? min.getFullYear() : new Date().getFullYear() - 10;
+ if (newYear >= minYear) {
return dayjs(prev).subtract(10, "year").toDate();
}
return prev;
});Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
ohcnetwork#9013) Co-authored-by: Rithvik Nishad <rithvikn2001@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: rithviknishad <mail@rithviknishad.dev>
… medical standards (ohcnetwork#9118)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 28
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (68)
cypress/pageobject/utils/paginationHelpers.ts (2)
6-8: Strengthen page number verification.The current URL verification might have false positives if the page number appears elsewhere in the URL.
Consider using a more precise URL check:
verifyCurrentPageNumber(pageNumber: number) { - cy.url().should("include", `page=${pageNumber}`); + cy.url().should("match", new RegExp(`[?&]page=${pageNumber}(?:&|$)`)); + // Optionally, also verify the actual content/state + cy.get("[data-testid=current-page]").should("have.text", String(pageNumber)); }
1-13: Consider enhancing the pagination helper with additional utilities.To improve maintainability and reduce duplication in test files, consider adding:
- JSDoc documentation for each method
- Helper for navigating to a specific page number
- Utility for verifying total page count
- Method for checking if next/previous buttons are disabled
Example enhancement:
/** * Navigates to a specific page number and verifies the navigation * @param targetPage - The page number to navigate to */ goToPage(targetPage: number) { cy.get("input[data-testid=page-input]") .clear() .type(`${targetPage}{enter}`); this.verifyCurrentPageNumber(targetPage); }src/Integrations/Sentry.tsx (1)
10-13: LGTM! Enhanced configuration validation improves developer experience.The additional check for
environmentand the descriptive error message help developers quickly identify misconfiguration issues during development.Note: While these validation checks are helpful during development, in production, when Sentry is disabled, this module is replaced with a dummy module containing skeleton handlers. Therefore, these checks primarily serve as development-time safeguards.
src/hooks/useBreakpoints.ts (1)
3-3: Consider maintaining consistent naming convention for breakpointsWhile most breakpoints follow the "xl" pattern (2xl, 3xl, 4xl), the "4k" breakpoint breaks this convention. Consider renaming it to "5xl" for consistency, or document the reasoning for the different naming pattern.
-type Breakpoints = "sm" | "md" | "lg" | "xl" | "2xl" | "3xl" | "4xl" | "4k"; +type Breakpoints = "sm" | "md" | "lg" | "xl" | "2xl" | "3xl" | "4xl" | "5xl";cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientBedManagement.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-67: Consider adding tests for date validation scenarios.Since this PR focuses on fixing date input validation in bed management, consider adding test cases to verify:
- Selection of out-of-range months is prevented
- Selection of out-of-range years is prevented
- Navigation buttons work correctly with invalid selections
Would you like me to help create these additional test cases?
src/Integrations/Plausible.tsx (1)
13-21: LGTM! Good addition of configuration validation.The validation logic effectively prevents analytics from running with incomplete configuration, which is a good defensive programming practice.
Consider these minor improvements:
const missingConfig = []; if (!careConfig.plausible.domain) missingConfig.push("domain"); if (!careConfig.plausible.server) missingConfig.push("server"); if (missingConfig.length > 0) { - console.error( - `Plausible analytics disabled. Missing configuration: ${missingConfig.join(", ")}`, - ); + console.error({ + message: "Plausible analytics disabled", + missingConfiguration: missingConfig, + }); return; }cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersHomepage.cy.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Good architectural improvement.The introduction of the centralized
pageNavigationhelper aligns with best practices by reducing code duplication and standardizing pagination handling across test files.
88-91: LGTM! Consider adding test descriptions.The refactored pagination test correctly uses the standardized helper. To improve test readability, consider adding descriptions for each step.
it("Next/Previous Page Navigation", () => { + // Navigate to next page and verify pageNavigation.navigateToNextPage(); pageNavigation.verifyCurrentPageNumber(2); + // Return to previous page and verify pageNavigation.navigateToPreviousPage(); pageNavigation.verifyCurrentPageNumber(1); });src/components/Facility/Consultations/LogUpdateAnalyseTable.tsx (2)
6-10: Add TypeScript improvements and documentationConsider enhancing the type safety and documentation:
+/** + * Props for the LogUpdateAnalyseTable component + * @param data - Record of timestamps mapping to data entries + * @param rows - Configuration for table rows + * @param choices - Optional mapping of field values to display strings + */ interface SharedSectionTableProps { data: Record<string, Record<string, string | boolean | null>>; rows: Array<{ title?: string; field?: string; subField?: boolean }>; - choices?: Record<string, Record<string | number, string>>; + choices?: Record<string, Readonly<Record<string | number, string>>>; }
59-86: Optimize row rendering and improve type safetyConsider enhancing performance and type safety in the row rendering logic.
+const Row = React.memo(({ row, dataValues, getDisplayValue }: { + row: SharedSectionTableProps['rows'][0]; + dataValues: Record<string, string | boolean | null>[]; + getDisplayValue: (value: string | boolean | null | undefined, field?: string) => string; +}) => ( <tr key={row.field ?? row.title} className={classNames(row.title && "border-t-2 border-t-secondary-600")} > <th + scope="row" className={classNames( "sticky left-0 border border-r-2 border-secondary-500 border-r-black bg-white p-2", row.subField ? "pl-4 font-medium" : "font-bold", )} > - {row.title ?? t(`LOG_UPDATE_FIELD_LABEL__${row.field!}`)} + {row.title ?? (row.field && t(`LOG_UPDATE_FIELD_LABEL__${row.field}`))} </th> {dataValues.map((obj, idx) => { const value = row.field ? obj[row.field] : undefined; return ( <td key={`${row.field}-${idx}`} className="w-80 border border-l-2 border-secondary-500 bg-secondary-100 p-2 text-center font-medium" > {row.field ? getDisplayValue(value, row.field) : "-"} </td> ); })} </tr> +)); +Row.displayName = 'LogUpdateTableRow';Then update the main render:
-{rows.map((row) => ( +{rows.map((row) => ( + <Row + key={row.field ?? row.title} + row={row} + dataValues={dataValues} + getDisplayValue={getDisplayValue} + /> ))}cypress/e2e/sample_test_spec/SampleTestRequest.cy.ts (4)
11-24: Consider moving test data to fixturesThe test data constants should be moved to a fixture file for better maintainability and reusability. This would make it easier to update test data and potentially reuse it across different test cases.
Example structure:
// cypress/fixtures/sampleTest.json { "patientName": "Dummy Patient Eleven", "sampleTestType": "BA/ETA", "icmrCategory": "Cat 0", // ... other test data }Then in the test:
let testData: any; before(() => { cy.fixture('sampleTest').then((data) => { testData = data; }); });
31-34: Document the purpose of localStorage clearingAdd a comment explaining which filters are being cleared and why. This will help maintainers understand the purpose of this cleanup step.
beforeEach(() => { cy.restoreLocalStorage(); + // Clear any persisted filter preferences to ensure consistent test state cy.clearLocalStorage(/filters--.+/); });
38-42: Add timeout and retry strategy for API callsThe API waiting strategy could be more robust. Consider adding appropriate timeouts and retry logic for better test stability.
-cy.awaitUrl("/patients"); +cy.url().should('include', '/patients', { timeout: 10000 }); +cy.intercept('GET', '**/api/patients*').as('patientList'); +cy.wait('@patientList', { timeout: 10000 }) + .its('response.statusCode') + .should('eq', 200);
71-86: Enhance verification of sample test detailsThe verification steps could be more specific and include additional assertions:
- Verify the exact format of displayed data
- Check for correct status transitions
- Validate timestamps and audit information
sampleTestPage.verifyPatientTestDetails( patientName, fastTrackReason, doctorName, diagnosis, differentialDiagnosis, etiologyIdentified, + { + validateFormat: true, + checkTimestamp: true, + verifyStatus: true + } );cypress/pageobject/Sample/SampleTestCreate.ts (3)
7-43: Consider enhancing form interaction methodsThe form interaction methods could be improved in the following ways:
- Add error handling for cases when elements are not found
- Consider combining similar methods to reduce code duplication
Example refactor for similar methods:
+ private fillFormField(selector: string, value: string, shouldCheck: boolean = false): void { + if (shouldCheck) { + cy.get(selector).should("be.visible").check(); + } + cy.get(selector).should("be.visible").type(value); + } - fillFastTrackReason(value: string): void { - cy.get("#is_fast_track").should("be.visible").check(); - cy.get("#fast_track").should("be.visible").type(value); - } + fillFastTrackReason(value: string): void { + this.fillFormField("#is_fast_track", value, true); + }
45-55: Enhance checkbox interaction methodsThe checkbox methods could be improved by:
- Adding verification of checkbox state after checking
- Combining similar methods using an enum
Consider this refactor:
+ enum CheckboxType { + SARI = 'has_sari', + ARI = 'has_ari', + UNUSUAL_COURSE = 'is_unusual_course' + } + checkOption(type: CheckboxType): void { + cy.get(`#${type}`) + .should('be.visible') + .check() + .should('be.checked'); + } - checkHasSari(): void { - cy.get("#has_sari").should("be.visible").check(); - } - checkHasAri(): void { - cy.get("#has_ari").should("be.visible").check(); - } - checkIsUnusualCourse(): void { - cy.get("#is_unusual_course").should("be.visible").check(); - }
1-114: Overall implementation reviewThe
SampleTestPageclass provides a comprehensive implementation for managing sample test requests, aligning well with the PR objectives. The code is well-structured and follows good TypeScript and Cypress patterns.Some general recommendations for the entire file:
- Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation
- Add error handling for edge cases
- Consider implementing retry logic for flaky tests
Consider adding this documentation template:
/** * Page object representing the Sample Test creation page. * @class SampleTestPage */cypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientConsultation.ts (3)
116-118: Consider refining the API endpoint pattern.The current pattern
**/api/v1/patient/**might be too broad and could intercept unintended requests. Consider making it more specific to match only the exact endpoint needed for patient details.- interceptPatientDetailsAPI(): void { - cy.intercept("GET", "**/api/v1/patient/**").as("patientDetails"); - } + interceptPatientDetailsAPI(): void { + // Intercept GET request for patient details + cy.intercept("GET", "**/api/v1/patient/[0-9]+/details").as("patientDetails"); + }
120-122: Enhance response verification coverage.The current verification only checks the status code. Consider adding assertions for response body structure and required fields to ensure data integrity.
- verifyPatientDetailsResponse(): void { - cy.wait("@patientDetails").its("response.statusCode").should("eq", 200); - } + verifyPatientDetailsResponse(): void { + cy.wait("@patientDetails").then((interception) => { + expect(interception.response?.statusCode).to.eq(200); + expect(interception.response?.body).to.have.property("id"); + expect(interception.response?.body).to.have.property("name"); + // Add more essential field checks + }); + }
116-122: Add JSDoc documentation for better maintainability.Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose and behavior of these methods.
+ /** + * Intercepts GET requests to the patient details endpoint. + * Sets up an alias 'patientDetails' for use in tests. + */ interceptPatientDetailsAPI(): void { cy.intercept("GET", "**/api/v1/patient/**").as("patientDetails"); } + /** + * Verifies the response from the patient details API call. + * Ensures successful response status and data integrity. + */ verifyPatientDetailsResponse(): void { cy.wait("@patientDetails").its("response.statusCode").should("eq", 200); }cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationDischarge.cy.ts (4)
50-56: Consider adding intermediate state verificationSimilar to the LAMA discharge test, consider adding assertions between the two submit actions to verify the confirmation dialog state.
patientPage.visitPatient("Discharge Patient Two"); patientDischarge.clickDischarge(); patientDischarge.selectDischargeReason(patientDischargeReason3); patientDischarge.typeDischargeNote(patientDeathCause); patientDischarge.typeDoctorName(doctorName); +// Verify all required fields are filled +cy.get('[data-testid="death-cause"]').should('have.value', patientDeathCause); +cy.get('[data-testid="doctor-name"]').should('have.value', doctorName); cy.clickSubmitButton("Confirm Discharge"); +cy.get('.confirmation-dialog').should('be.visible'); cy.clickSubmitButton("Acknowledge & Submit");
Line range hint
70-81: Replace hardcoded waits with proper assertionsThe test uses
cy.wait(2000)which can make tests flaky. Consider replacing these with proper assertions that wait for specific conditions.patientPage.visitPatient("Discharge Patient Three"); patientDischarge.clickDischarge(); patientDischarge.selectDischargeReason(patientDischargeReason2); patientDischarge.typeDischargeNote(patientDischargeAdvice); patientDischarge.typeReferringFacility(referringFacility); patientDischarge.clickClearButton(); patientDischarge.typeReferringFacility(referringFreetextFacility); -cy.wait(2000); +cy.get('[data-testid="facility-input"]').should('have.value', referringFreetextFacility); cy.clickSubmitButton("Confirm Discharge"); +cy.get('.confirmation-dialog').should('be.visible'); cy.clickSubmitButton("Acknowledge & Submit");
Line range hint
96-113: Improve test reliability and structure
- Replace hardcoded waits with proper assertions
- Consider splitting the prescription and discharge tests for better maintainability
patientPage.visitPatient("Discharge Patient Four"); patientDischarge.clickDischarge(); patientDischarge.selectDischargeReason(patientDischargeReason1); patientDischarge.typeDischargeNote(patientDischargeAdvice); patientPrescription.clickAddPrescription(); patientPrescription.interceptMedibase(); patientPrescription.selectMedicinebox(); patientPrescription.selectMedicine(patientMedicine); patientPrescription.enterDosage("4"); patientPrescription.selectDosageFrequency("Twice daily"); cy.clickSubmitButton("Submit"); cy.verifyNotification("Medicine prescribed"); -cy.wait(2000); +cy.get('[data-testid="prescription-list"]').should('contain', patientMedicine); cy.closeNotification(); cy.clickSubmitButton("Confirm Discharge"); +cy.get('.confirmation-dialog').should('be.visible'); cy.clickSubmitButton("Acknowledge & Submit"); -cy.wait(2000); +cy.get('[data-testid="discharge-status"]').should('be.visible');Consider splitting this into two separate test cases:
- Test prescription workflow independently
- Test discharge workflow with existing prescription
This would improve test maintainability and make it easier to debug failures.
Line range hint
1-130: Consider architectural improvements for better test maintainabilityThe test file would benefit from:
- A shared helper function for the discharge confirmation flow
- Custom commands for common patterns
- Constants for selector strings
Example helper function:
// commands.ts Cypress.Commands.add('confirmDischarge', (reason: string) => { cy.clickSubmitButton("Confirm Discharge"); cy.get('.confirmation-dialog').should('be.visible'); cy.clickSubmitButton("Acknowledge & Submit"); cy.verifyNotification("Patient Discharged Successfully"); cy.get('[data-testid="discharge-status"]').should('contain', reason); });This would make the tests more maintainable and reduce duplication.
package.json (1)
150-150: Consider upgrading zod to the latest version.The current version
3.23.8is quite old. Consider upgrading to the latest version to benefit from bug fixes, security patches, and new features.cypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientCreation.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-236: Excellent implementation of the Page Object Model pattern.The implementation demonstrates several good practices:
- Clear separation of concerns with well-organized methods
- Consistent API interception and status code verification
- Comprehensive verification methods for patient details
- Good use of TypeScript for type safety
Consider extracting common verification logic into shared helper methods to further reduce code duplication, particularly in the dashboard verification methods.
src/components/Facility/TransferPatientDialog.tsx (3)
78-93: Simplify handleChange logic and improve type safety.The current implementation can be improved for better maintainability and type safety.
Consider these improvements:
- const value = String(e.value); + const value = e.value as string; if (e.name === "year_of_birth") { if (value.length <= 4) { - dispatch({ - type: "set_form", - form: { ...state.form, [e.name]: e.value }, - }); - } - } else { - dispatch({ - type: "set_form", - form: { ...state.form, [e.name]: e.value }, - }); + dispatch({ type: "set_form", form: { ...state.form, [e.name]: value } }); + } + return; } + dispatch({ type: "set_form", form: { ...state.form, [e.name]: e.value } });
134-138: Improve parseInt usage and maintain consistency with error messages.The validation logic should be consistent with the blur handler and use safe parsing practices.
After extracting the validation logic as suggested above, update this section:
- if (parseInt(state.form[field] || "0") < 1900) { - errors[field] = `Cannot be smaller than 1900`; - invalidForm = true; - } + const yearValue = parseInt(state.form[field] || "0", 10); + const errorMessage = validateYearOfBirth(yearValue); + if (errorMessage) { + errors[field] = errorMessage; + invalidForm = true; + }
Line range hint
1-243: Consider extracting form validation into a custom hook.The current implementation mixes form state management, validation logic, and UI rendering. Consider extracting the form logic into a custom hook (e.g.,
useTransferPatientForm) to improve separation of concerns and reusability.This would:
- Separate form logic from UI rendering
- Make the validation rules more maintainable
- Make the component easier to test
- Allow reuse of the validation logic in other forms
Example structure:
const useTransferPatientForm = (facilityId: string) => { const [state, dispatch] = useReducer(patientFormReducer, initialState); const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false); const validateYearOfBirth = useCallback((year: number | null) => { // validation logic }, []); const handleSubmit = useCallback(async () => { // submit logic }, [facilityId, state.form]); return { form: state.form, errors: state.errors, isLoading, handleChange, handleBlur, handleSubmit, }; };cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientPrescription.cy.ts (4)
Line range hint
1-15: Add test coverage for date input validation feature.The PR objectives mention implementing validation for date input dropdown to prevent out-of-range month/year selection. However, this test file doesn't include any test cases for this new feature. Consider adding test scenarios to verify:
- Selection of out-of-range months is prevented
- Selection of out-of-range years is prevented
- Navigation buttons work correctly with invalid selections
Would you like help creating test scenarios for the date input validation feature?
Line range hint
29-39: Consider using test data fixtures instead of hardcoded values.Using hardcoded patient names like "Dummy Patient Nine" makes tests brittle. Consider moving test data to fixtures for better maintainability.
+ // Add to cypress/fixtures/patients.json + { + "testPatients": { + "patient1": "Dummy Patient Nine", + "patient2": "Dummy Patient Six", + // ... other test patients + } + } - patientPage.visitPatient("Dummy Patient Nine"); + cy.fixture('patients').then((patients) => { + patientPage.visitPatient(patients.testPatients.patient1); + });
Line range hint
66-86: Reduce code duplication by creating a custom command.The medicine addition steps are repeated. Consider creating a custom Cypress command to encapsulate this common pattern.
+ // Add to cypress/support/commands.ts + Cypress.Commands.add('addMedicine', (medicineName, dosage, indicator = '') => { + const prescription = new PatientPrescription(); + prescription.clickAddPrnPrescriptionButton(); + prescription.interceptMedibase(); + prescription.selectMedicinebox(); + prescription.selectMedicine(medicineName); + prescription.enterDosage(dosage); + if (indicator) { + prescription.enterIndicator(indicator); + } + cy.clickSubmitButton("Submit"); + cy.verifyNotification("Medicine prescribed"); + cy.closeNotification(); + }); - // Replace repeated code blocks with + cy.addMedicine(medicineNameOne, medicineBaseDosage, medicineIndicator); + cy.addMedicine(medicineNameTwo, medicineBaseDosage, medicineIndicator);
Line range hint
158-162: Enhance error validation coverage.The test only verifies the error notification. Consider adding assertions for:
- Form error state
- Error indicators on specific fields
- Submit button state
cy.clickSubmitButton("Submit"); cy.verifyNotification( "Medicine - This medicine is already prescribed to this patient. Please discontinue the existing prescription to prescribe again.", ); + // Add assertions for form state + cy.get('[data-testid="medicine-form"]').should('have.class', 'error'); + cy.get('[data-testid="medicine-select"]').should('have.class', 'error'); + cy.get('[data-testid="submit-button"]').should('be.disabled');src/components/Patient/SampleTestCard.tsx (3)
82-82: LGTM! Consider adding ARIA attributes for better accessibility.The addition of the
idattribute improves testability. Consider enhancing accessibility by adding corresponding ARIA attributes.<div id="sample-test-history" + role="article" + aria-label="Sample Test History" className={`${
104-107: Ensure consistent text content for screen readers.The status text is properly wrapped with an identifier. Consider adding ARIA attributes to improve the relationship between the label and value.
<div id="sample-test-status" + role="status" + aria-label={`Sample test status: ${startCase(camelCase(itemData.status))}`} className="mt-1 overflow-x-scroll whitespace-normal break-words text-sm font-medium leading-5" >
Line range hint
31-62: Consider enhancing error handling and loading states.While the current implementation works, consider the following improvements for better user experience and type safety:
- Add loading states during async operations
- Enhance error handling for failed status updates
- Use TypeScript enum for sample test status instead of magic numbers
Example implementation:
enum SampleTestStatus { APPROVED = 4, COMPLETED = 7, // ... other statuses } const handleApproval1 = async ( sample: SampleTestModel, status: SampleTestStatus, result: number, ) => { try { setIsLoading(true); const sampleData: Partial<SampleTestModel> = { id: sample.id, status, consultation: sample.consultation, }; if (status === SampleTestStatus.COMPLETED) { sampleData.result = result; sampleData.date_of_result = new Date().toISOString(); } const statusName = SAMPLE_TEST_STATUS.find((i) => i.id === status)?.desc; await request(routes.patchSample, { pathParams: { id: sample.id! }, body: sampleData, onResponse: ({ res }) => { if (res?.ok) { refetch(); Notification.Success({ msg: `Success - ${statusName}` }); } else { Notification.Error({ msg: `Failed to update status - ${statusName}` }); } dismissUpdateStatus(); }, }); } catch (error) { Notification.Error({ msg: 'An unexpected error occurred' }); } finally { setIsLoading(false); } };cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientHomepage.cy.ts (1)
167-175: Consider enhancing test readability with page assertions.The refactoring to use centralized pagination helpers improves code organization. However, consider adding assertions for the page content before and after navigation to make the test's intent more explicit.
cy.get('[data-cy="patient"]') .first() .invoke("text") .then((patientOne: string) => { firstPatientPageOne = patientOne.trim(); pageNavigation.navigateToNextPage(); pageNavigation.verifyCurrentPageNumber(2); + cy.contains('[data-testid="page-info"]', 'Page 2').should('exist'); cy.get('[data-cy="patient"]') .first() .invoke("text") .then((patientTwo: string) => { const firstPatientPageTwo = patientTwo.trim(); expect(firstPatientPageOne).not.to.eq(firstPatientPageTwo); pageNavigation.navigateToPreviousPage(); + cy.contains('[data-testid="page-info"]', 'Page 1').should('exist'); }); });src/components/Facility/BedCapacity.tsx (1)
282-295: Simplify submit button rendering logicThe current implementation has room for improvement in terms of maintainability and clarity:
- Button text logic is split between variable and hardcoded text
- Conditional rendering could be simplified
- Event handlers could be more readable
Consider this refactoring:
- {headerText === "Add Bed Capacity" && ( - <Submit - id="bed-capacity-save-and-exit" - onClick={(e) => handleSubmit(e, "Save and Exit")} - label="Save Bed Capacity" - /> - )} - {!isLastOptionType && ( - <Submit - id="bed-capacity-save" - onClick={(e) => handleSubmit(e)} - label={buttonText} - /> - )} + const handleSaveAndExit = (e: React.MouseEvent) => handleSubmit(e, "Save and Exit"); + const handleSaveAndContinue = (e: React.MouseEvent) => handleSubmit(e); + + {!id && ( // Add mode + <> + <Submit + id="bed-capacity-save-and-exit" + onClick={handleSaveAndExit} + label="Save Bed Capacity" + /> + {!isLastOptionType && ( + <Submit + id="bed-capacity-save-and-continue" + onClick={handleSaveAndContinue} + label="Save & Add More" + /> + )} + </> + )} + {id && ( // Edit mode + <Submit + id="bed-capacity-update" + onClick={handleSaveAndExit} + label="Update Bed Capacity" + /> + )}This refactoring:
- Extracts event handlers for better readability
- Groups buttons by mode (Add/Edit) for clearer logic
- Uses more descriptive button IDs
- Simplifies button text logic
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientRegistration.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-275: Add test coverage for date input validation.Given that the PR's main objective is to prevent out-of-range month/year selection in date inputs, consider adding test cases to verify:
- Inability to select out-of-range months
- Inability to select out-of-range years
- Navigation button functionality when invalid selections are attempted
Would you like me to help generate test cases for these scenarios?
src/components/Patient/SampleTest.tsx (6)
283-283: Maintain consistent ID naming conventionThe fast track field IDs use underscores while other fields use kebab-case. Consider updating for consistency:
- id="is_fast_track" + id="is-fast-track" - id="fast_track" + id="fast-track"Also applies to: 288-288
294-297: Align ID naming with kebab-case conventionFor consistency with other form fields, consider updating these IDs:
- id="doctor_name" + id="doctor-name" - id="diagnosis" + id="diagnosis-field"Also applies to: 315-317
299-299: Simplify and standardize ID namingConsider shorter, kebab-case IDs for better maintainability:
- id="is_atypical_presentation" + id="is-atypical" - id="atypical_presentation" + id="atypical-details"Also applies to: 305-305
319-324: Standardize ID naming conventionUpdate IDs to follow kebab-case:
- id="etiology_identified" + id="etiology-identified" - id="diff_diagnosis" + id="diff-diagnosis"
328-337: Align checkbox IDs with kebab-case conventionUpdate checkbox IDs for consistency:
- id="has_sari" + id="has-sari" - id="has_ari" + id="has-ari" - id="is_unusual_course" + id="is-unusual-course"
Line range hint
1-347: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainabilityWhile adding IDs improves accessibility, consider these architectural enhancements:
- Extract form validation logic into a separate hook or utility
- Add explicit error handling for API failures
- Consider using a form management library like React Hook Form or Formik for better validation and state management
- Add loading states for the submit button to prevent double submissions
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (1)
1-1: Consider using relative path for consistencyWhile the new import works, consider using a relative path (
../../pageobject/utils/paginationHelpers) to maintain consistency with other imports in the file.src/components/Patient/SampleViewAdmin.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-411: Consider enhancing security measures for sensitive medical dataThe component handles sensitive medical information including:
- Patient names
- Test results
- Contact tracing data
- SARI/ARI status
Consider implementing additional security measures:
- Add data sanitization for search inputs
- Implement rate limiting for the export functionality
- Add audit logging for status updates
- Consider masking sensitive data in the UI when not needed
Line range hint
42-77: Enhance error handling for API failuresThe data fetching logic could benefit from more robust error handling:
- Add error states for failed API calls
- Implement retry logic for transient failures
- Show user-friendly error messages
Example implementation:
const { data: facilityData, error: facilityError } = useQuery(routes.getAnyFacility, { pathParams: { id: qParams.facility, }, prefetch: !!qParams.facility, retry: 3, onError: (error) => { Notification.Error({ msg: "Failed to fetch facility data. Please try again.", }); }, });cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts (2)
320-335: LGTM! Consider enhancing error state verification.The test case effectively validates district-level access control. Consider enhancing it with additional assertions:
facilityPage.verifyErrorNotification( "You do not have permission to perform this action.", ); +// Verify URL hasn't changed after failed submission +cy.url().should('include', '/facility/create'); +// Verify form data persistence +facilityPage.getFacilityName().should('have.value', facilityName); +// Verify facility wasn't created +cy.visit('/facility'); +manageUserPage.typeFacilitySearch(facilityName); +facilityPage.verifyFacilityNotFound(facilityName);
338-341: Add explicit typing for login methods array.Consider adding type safety:
-const nonAdminLoginMethods = [ +const nonAdminLoginMethods: Array<() => void> = [ loginPage.loginAsDevDoctor.bind(loginPage), loginPage.loginAsStaff.bind(loginPage), ];cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientLogUpdate.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-357: Consider enhancing error handling in test assertionsWhile the test structure is solid, consider adding timeout and retry strategies for flaky UI interactions. This would make the tests more robust against timing issues, especially for operations like:
- Form submissions
- Notification appearances
- Content verifications
Example enhancement for notification checks:
-cy.verifyNotification("Consultation updated successfully"); +cy.verifyNotification("Consultation updated successfully", { + timeout: 10000, + retryOnFailure: true +});cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationCreation.cy.ts (2)
264-264: Extract common date validation scenariosThe test includes ICU admission date input but follows the same pattern of missing date range validation.
Consider extracting common date validation scenarios into shared test hooks or custom commands to reduce duplication across test cases:
// support/commands.ts Cypress.Commands.add('verifyDateRangeValidation', (selector: string) => { cy.get(selector).within(() => { // Test out-of-range month selection // Test out-of-range year selection // Test navigation buttons }); }); // Usage in test cy.verifyDateRangeValidation('#icu_admission_date');
378-378: Consider using test data constantsWhile the method renaming is correct, the hardcoded patient name could be moved to a constant at the top of the file along with other test data.
- patientPage.visitPatient("Dummy Patient Thirteen"); + const TEST_PATIENT = "Dummy Patient Thirteen"; + // Add to constants at the top + patientPage.visitPatient(TEST_PATIENT);Also applies to: 389-389
src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx (1)
ID attributes need to be unique - Potential DOM conflicts detected
The same IDs (
doctor_name,diagnosis, andetiology_identified) are used in bothSampleDetails.tsxandSampleTest.tsx. While they appear to be in different components, this could cause issues if both components are rendered simultaneously in the DOM. To ensure proper accessibility and avoid potential conflicts:
- In
src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx, prefix the IDs with a component-specific identifier:
- Change
id="doctor_name"toid="sample_details_doctor_name"- Change
id="diagnosis"toid="sample_details_diagnosis"- Change
id="etiology_identified"toid="sample_details_etiology_identified"- Apply similar prefixing to other IDs in this component
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
334-401: Verify uniqueness of added ID attributesLet's ensure that the newly added ID attributes are unique across the application to prevent potential conflicts.
Let me check the exact context where these IDs are used in both files to ensure they're not rendered simultaneously.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for duplicate IDs across the application # Test: Search for occurrences of the newly added IDs echo "Checking for duplicate IDs..." for id in "patient_name" "fast_track_reason" "doctor_name" "diagnosis" "diff_diagnosis" "etiology_identified"; do echo "Checking ID: $id" rg -l "id=\"$id\"" || true doneLength of output: 1702
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the context of duplicate IDs in both files echo "=== SampleDetails.tsx ===" rg -B 2 -A 2 'id="(doctor_name|diagnosis|etiology_identified)"' src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx echo -e "\n=== SampleTest.tsx ===" rg -B 2 -A 2 'id="(doctor_name|diagnosis|etiology_identified)"' src/components/Patient/SampleTest.tsxLength of output: 1259
src/components/Notifications/NotificationsList.tsx (1)
292-332: Consider these improvements to the unsubscribe functionWhile the refactoring significantly improves error handling and adds proper cleanup, consider these enhancements:
- Use Success notification type for successful unsubscription instead of Warn
- Flatten the nested try-catch for better readability
Here's a suggested refactor:
const unsubscribe = async () => { try { const reg = await navigator.serviceWorker.ready; if (!reg.pushManager) { Error({ msg: t("unsubscribe_failed") }); return; } setIsSubscribing(true); const subscription = await reg.pushManager.getSubscription(); if (!subscription) { return; } await subscription.unsubscribe(); await request(routes.updateUserPnconfig, { pathParams: { username }, body: { pf_endpoint: "", pf_p256dh: "", pf_auth: "", }, }); setIsSubscribed("NotSubscribed"); - Warn({ + Success({ msg: t("unsubscribed_successfully"), }); } catch (e) { Sentry.captureException(e); Error({ msg: t("subscription_error") }); } finally { setIsSubscribing(false); } };src/components/Facility/models.tsx (1)
394-397: Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentationAdding JSDoc comments would improve the documentation by describing the purpose of these fields and providing examples.
+/** + * Represents nursing procedures and their descriptions in daily rounds + * @example + * { + * nursing: [ + * { procedure: "Wound Dressing", description: "Changed dressing on surgical site" } + * ] + * } + */ export type NursingPlotRes = { nursing: Array<{ procedure: string; description: string; }>; };src/components/Common/DateInputV2.tsx (4)
235-246: Optimize year validation logicThe year validation has redundant checks. The date-based validation on lines 242-243 is unnecessary since we already check the year bounds on lines 236-237.
const isYearWithinConstraints = (year: number) => { if (min && year < min.getFullYear()) return false; if (max && year > max.getFullYear()) return false; - - const yearStart = new Date(year, 0, 1); - const yearEnd = new Date(year, 11, 31); - - if (min && yearEnd < min) return false; - if (max && yearStart > max) return false; - return true; };
265-267: Use i18n for error messagesThe error messages should use the i18n system for consistency with the rest of the application.
- msg: outOfLimitsErrorMessage ?? "Cannot select month out of range", + msg: outOfLimitsErrorMessage ?? t("errors.date_month_out_of_range"), - msg: outOfLimitsErrorMessage ?? "Cannot select year out of range", + msg: outOfLimitsErrorMessage ?? t("errors.date_year_out_of_range"),Also applies to: 282-284
Line range hint
422-556: Extract navigation button into a reusable componentThe navigation buttons share similar markup and behavior. Consider extracting them into a reusable component to reduce code duplication.
interface NavigationButtonProps { direction: 'left' | 'right'; disabled: boolean; onClick: () => void; testId: string; } const NavigationButton: React.FC<NavigationButtonProps> = ({ direction, disabled, onClick, testId, }) => ( <button type="button" disabled={disabled} className="inline-flex aspect-square cursor-pointer items-center justify-center rounded p-2 transition duration-100 ease-in-out hover:bg-secondary-300" onClick={onClick} data-test-id={testId} > <CareIcon icon={direction === 'left' ? "l-angle-left-b" : "l-angle-right-b"} className="text-lg" /> </button> );Usage example:
-<button - type="button" - disabled={!isDateWithinConstraints( - getLastDay(), - datePickerHeaderDate.getMonth() - 1, - datePickerHeaderDate.getFullYear(), - )} - className="inline-flex aspect-square cursor-pointer items-center justify-center rounded p-2 transition duration-100 ease-in-out hover:bg-secondary-300" - onClick={decrement} - data-test-id="decrement-date-range" -> - <CareIcon icon="l-angle-left-b" className="text-lg" /> -</button> +<NavigationButton + direction="left" + disabled={!isDateWithinConstraints( + getLastDay(), + datePickerHeaderDate.getMonth() - 1, + datePickerHeaderDate.getFullYear(), + )} + onClick={decrement} + testId="decrement-date-range" +/>
Line range hint
639-675: Simplify conditional styling and avoid !important flagsThe conditional classes are complex and use !important flags. Consider using the
classNamesutility more effectively and restructuring the CSS to avoid !important.className={classNames( "w-1/4 rounded-lg px-2 py-4 text-center text-sm font-semibold", - isSelectedMonth(i) - ? "bg-primary-500 text-white cursor-pointer" - : isMonthWithinConstraints(i) - ? "text-secondary-700 hover:bg-secondary-300 cursor-pointer" - : "!text-secondary-400 !cursor-not-allowed", + { + "bg-primary-500 text-white": isSelectedMonth(i), + "text-secondary-700 hover:bg-secondary-300": !isSelectedMonth(i) && isMonthWithinConstraints(i), + "text-secondary-400 cursor-not-allowed": !isMonthWithinConstraints(i), + } )}src/components/Patient/DailyRounds.tsx (1)
Line range hint
242-243: Add validation for ventilator_spo2 fieldThe
validateFormfunction should include validation for theventilator_spo2field to ensure values are within the valid range (0-100%).Add the following validation in the
validateFormfunction:case "temperature": { // ... existing temperature validation ... return; } + case "ventilator_spo2": { + const spo2Value = state.form[field]; + if (spo2Value && (spo2Value < 0 || spo2Value > 100)) { + errors[field] = t("out_of_range_error", { start: "0%", end: "100%" }); + invalidForm = true; + scrollTo("ventilator_spo2"); + } + return; + }src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/ConsultationNursingTab.tsx (2)
154-154: Use strict equality operator'==='instead of'=='It's recommended to use the strict equality operator
===to avoid unexpected type coercion in JavaScript and TypeScript.Apply this change:
- {fieldsToDisplay.size == 0 ? ( + {fieldsToDisplay.size === 0 ? (
253-253: Remove redundantaria-labelfrom heading elementsUsing
aria-labelon heading elements like<h4>is unnecessary because screen readers already read the content of the heading. Unless a different label is needed, you can safely remove it to avoid redundancy.Modify the code as follows:
- <h4 aria-label={t("routine")}>{t("routine")}</h4> + <h4>{t("routine")}</h4> - <h4 aria-label={t("nursing_care")}>{t("nursing_care")}</h4> + <h4>{t("nursing_care")}</h4>Also applies to: 257-257
src/components/Resource/ResourceList.tsx (5)
222-225: Replace arbitrary pixel padding with standard spacing classesUsing arbitrary pixel values like
py-[11px]can lead to inconsistencies across different screen sizes and devices. Consider using standard Tailwind CSS spacing classes for padding to maintain consistency.Apply this diff to use a standard padding class:
-<ButtonV2 className="py-[11px]" onClick={onBoardViewBtnClick}> +<ButtonV2 className="py-3" onClick={onBoardViewBtnClick}>
223-223: Use a more suitable icon instead of rotatingRotating the
l-list-ulicon may not provide the desired visual effect and can impact accessibility. Consider using an icon that directly represents the "Board View" without rotation, such asl-th-largeor another appropriate icon from the icon set.Apply this diff to select a suitable icon:
-<CareIcon icon="l-list-ul" className="rotate-90" /> +<CareIcon icon="l-th-large" />
255-255: Ensure consistency of translation keysThe translation keys
LOG_UPDATE_FIELD_LABEL__patient_categoryandLOG_UPDATE_FIELD_LABEL__actionseem verbose and may not follow the standard naming conventions used elsewhere. Consistent and concise keys improve maintainability and readability. Consider updating them to align with other keys.Apply this diff to rename the translation keys:
-{t("LOG_UPDATE_FIELD_LABEL__patient_category")} +{t("patient_category")} ... -{t("LOG_UPDATE_FIELD_LABEL__action")} +{t("action")}Also applies to: 264-264
89-122: Refactor status rendering for better readability and maintainabilityThe conditional rendering logic for
resource.statuscontains duplicated code and complex conditions. Extracting this logic into a separate component or function can improve readability and make the code more maintainable.Consider creating a
ResourceStatusChipcomponent:// Create a new component for the status chip const ResourceStatusChip = ({ status }) => { const isTransportation = status === "TRANSPORTATION TO BE ARRANGED"; const variant = status === "APPROVED" ? "primary" : "secondary"; const bgColor = status === "APPROVED" ? "bg-sky-200" : "bg-yellow-200"; return ( <Chip size="small" variant={isTransportation ? "secondary" : variant} startIcon="l-truck" text={t(status)} className={`text-lg font-bold rounded-full uppercase ${ isTransportation ? "text-sky-600 bg-gray-300" : bgColor }`} /> ); };Then update the original code:
-{resource.status === "TRANSPORTATION TO BE ARRANGED" ? ( - // Existing complex rendering logic -) : ( - // Existing complex rendering logic -)} +<dt + title={t("resource_status")} + className="w-fit mt-1 h-fit flex h-5 shrink-0 items-center rounded-full leading-4" +> + <ResourceStatusChip status={resource.status} /> +</dt>
208-208: Remove unnecessary empty<div>elementThe
<div className="md:px-4"></div>is empty and does not contribute to the layout or functionality. Removing it can clean up the code and avoid unnecessary rendering.Apply this diff to remove the empty
<div>:-<div className="md:px-4"></div>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (61)
cypress.config.ts(2 hunks)cypress/e2e/assets_spec/AssetHomepage.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts(3 hunks)cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts(3 hunks)cypress/e2e/hcx_spec/HcxClaims.cy.ts(3 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientBedManagement.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationCreation.cy.ts(9 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationDischarge.cy.ts(6 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientDoctorConnect.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientDoctorNotes.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientFileUpload.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientHomepage.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientInvestigation.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientLogUpdate.cy.ts(15 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientPrescription.cy.ts(10 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientRegistration.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/e2e/sample_test_spec/SampleTestRequest.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersHomepage.cy.ts(3 hunks)cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersManage.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Asset/AssetPagination.ts(0 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityCreation.ts(2 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Login/LoginPage.ts(1 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientConsultation.ts(1 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientCreation.ts(2 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientFileupload.ts(3 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientHome.ts(0 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Sample/SampleTestCreate.ts(1 hunks)cypress/pageobject/Users/UserSearch.ts(0 hunks)cypress/pageobject/utils/paginationHelpers.ts(1 hunks)cypress/support/commands.ts(1 hunks)cypress/support/index.ts(1 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)public/locale/en.json(8 hunks)src/CAREUI/interactive/LegendInput.tsx(1 hunks)src/Integrations/Plausible.tsx(1 hunks)src/Integrations/Sentry.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Auth/Login.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Common/AvatarEditModal.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Common/DateInputV2.tsx(7 hunks)src/components/Facility/BedCapacity.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Facility/CentralNursingStation.tsx(4 hunks)src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/ConsultationNursingTab.tsx(4 hunks)src/components/Facility/Consultations/LogUpdateAnalyseTable.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Facility/Consultations/NursingPlot.tsx(0 hunks)src/components/Facility/FacilityHome.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Facility/TransferPatientDialog.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Facility/models.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Files/AudioCaptureDialog.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Notifications/NotificationsList.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Patient/DailyRounds.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Patient/ManagePatients.tsx(4 hunks)src/components/Patient/PatientHome.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Patient/PatientRegister.tsx(6 hunks)src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Patient/SampleTest.tsx(5 hunks)src/components/Patient/SampleTestCard.tsx(5 hunks)src/components/Patient/SampleViewAdmin.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Resource/ResourceList.tsx(5 hunks)src/hooks/useBreakpoints.ts(2 hunks)vite.config.mts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- cypress/pageobject/Asset/AssetPagination.ts
- cypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientHome.ts
- cypress/pageobject/Users/UserSearch.ts
- src/components/Facility/Consultations/NursingPlot.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientDoctorNotes.cy.ts
- cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientFileUpload.cy.ts
- src/CAREUI/interactive/LegendInput.tsx
- src/components/Auth/Login.tsx
- src/components/Files/AudioCaptureDialog.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (4)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts (1)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationDischarge.cy.ts (1)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationCreation.cy.ts:93-94
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:48:08.501Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationCreation.cy.ts`, bed capacity verification assertions after patient admission are already being performed elsewhere, so adding them here is unnecessary.
src/Integrations/Sentry.tsx (2)
Learnt from: sainak
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9160
File: src/Integrations/Sentry.tsx:4-16
Timestamp: 2024-11-19T14:04:36.276Z
Learning: When Sentry is disabled, the `src/Integrations/Sentry.tsx` module is replaced with a dummy module that has skeleton handlers based on the main file, so additional checks in `initSentry` are unnecessary.
Learnt from: sainak
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9160
File: src/Integrations/Sentry.tsx:19-25
Timestamp: 2024-11-19T14:04:32.755Z
Learning: In the `src/Integrations/Sentry.tsx` file, the Sentry module may be replaced with a dummy module that has skeleton handlers based on the main file, so additional error handling in the `captureException` function is not required.
src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/ConsultationNursingTab.tsx (2)
Learnt from: sainak
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9079
File: src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/ConsultationNursingTab.tsx:93-117
Timestamp: 2024-11-13T11:33:22.403Z
Learning: In `src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/ConsultationNursingTab.tsx`, the parent component manages the loading state, so child components like `NursingPlot` should not implement their own loading indicators.
Learnt from: sainak
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9079
File: src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/ConsultationNursingTab.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-13T11:32:39.734Z
Learning: In this project, the `request` function used for API calls handles displaying error notifications internally, so additional error handling in the components is unnecessary.
🔇 Additional comments (78)
cypress/pageobject/utils/paginationHelpers.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM! Well-structured pagination helper.
The object structure provides a clean and maintainable way to organize pagination-related test helpers.
10-12: Apply the same button state validation as suggested for navigateToNextPage.
For consistency and robustness, apply the same improvements suggested for the next page navigation.
cypress.config.ts (4)
3-3: LGTM: Standard dotenv import
The addition of dotenv import follows best practices for environment variable management.
6-6: LGTM: Proper dotenv initialization
The dotenv.config() call is correctly placed at the beginning of the file to ensure environment variables are loaded before use.
38-38:
Verify the removal of default API_URL value
The default fallback URL "http://localhost:9000" has been removed. This could cause tests to fail if REACT_CARE_API_URL is not set in the environment.
Let's verify the impact:
Consider adding a default value to prevent test failures:
- API_URL: process.env.REACT_CARE_API_URL,
+ API_URL: process.env.REACT_CARE_API_URL ?? "http://localhost:9000",Line range hint 1-41: Unrelated changes to PR objective
These configuration changes appear unrelated to the PR's objective of "Disallow picking out of range month or year in date input dropdown". Consider submitting these changes in a separate PR focused on environment configuration improvements.
Let's verify if this is part of a larger refactoring:
src/hooks/useBreakpoints.ts (2)
13-14: LGTM! Width values are appropriate and properly ordered
The new breakpoint values (2560px for 4xl and 3840px for 4k) are standard resolutions for large displays and maintain the ascending order requirement.
Line range hint 21-36: Verify components using these new breakpoints
The hook's logic remains sound, but we should verify that components using these breakpoints handle the new values correctly.
✅ Verification successful
No issues found with breakpoint usage across components
The verification shows that the useBreakpoints hook is used safely across the codebase:
- All components using the hook (
CentralNursingStation,CameraFeed, etc.) properly handle breakpoints through the hook's abstraction - The new breakpoint values (
4xl: 2560,4k: 3840) are only used directly in tailwind classes for styling purposes - The hook's logic for selecting breakpoints remains backward compatible, falling back to "default" when no breakpoint matches
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components using useBreakpoints
echo "Components using useBreakpoints:"
rg -l "useBreakpoints" --type tsx
# Search for direct usage of the breakpoint values
echo -e "\nDirect usage of breakpoint values:"
rg -A 2 "4xl|4k" --type tsx
Length of output: 279
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components using useBreakpoints with correct file extension
echo "Components using useBreakpoints:"
rg -l "useBreakpoints" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js
# Search for direct usage of breakpoint values
echo -e "\nDirect usage of breakpoint values:"
rg -A 2 "4xl|4k" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js
# Check the breakpoint constants
echo -e "\nBreakpoint definitions:"
rg "BREAKPOINT_WIDTH" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js -A 5
Length of output: 501
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components using useBreakpoints
echo "Components using useBreakpoints:"
rg -l "useBreakpoints"
# Search for direct usage of breakpoint values
echo -e "\nDirect usage of breakpoint values:"
rg -A 2 "4xl|4k"
# Check the breakpoint constants
echo -e "\nBreakpoint definitions:"
rg "BREAKPOINT_WIDTH" -A 5
Length of output: 14138
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientInvestigation.cy.ts (2)
31-31: Verify custom command definition
The method name change improves clarity, but we need to ensure the custom command clickSubmitButton is properly defined.
✅ Verification successful
Custom command clickSubmitButton is properly defined and consistently used
The command is correctly defined in cypress/support/commands.ts with a default parameter and is used consistently across multiple test files, including the investigated usage in PatientInvestigation.cy.ts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the custom command definition exists
# Search for command definition in support files
echo "Searching for clickSubmitButton command definition..."
rg "Cypress.Commands.add\(['\"]clickSubmitButton" "cypress/support"
# Search for any references to ensure consistent usage
echo "Checking usage consistency across test files..."
rg "cy\.clickSubmitButton" "cypress/e2e"
Length of output: 6154
10-10: Verify test data availability
Please ensure that "Dummy Patient Thirteen" exists in the test database to prevent test failures.
✅ Verification successful
Test data "Dummy Patient Thirteen" is already in use
The patient name "Dummy Patient Thirteen" is already being used in multiple test files:
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientInvestigation.cy.tscypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationCreation.cy.tscypress/e2e/hcx_spec/HcxClaims.cy.ts
This indicates that the test data exists and is consistently used across the test suite.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for references to the patient name in test data or setup files
# Look for patient name in fixture files
echo "Searching for patient name in fixture files..."
fd -e json -x grep -l "Dummy Patient Thirteen" {}
# Look for patient name in test setup files
echo "Searching for patient name in test setup..."
rg "Dummy Patient Thirteen" "cypress/support" "cypress/fixtures"
Length of output: 316
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any patient data patterns in the test files and fixtures
# This will help us understand how test data is managed
# Look for patient data patterns in fixture files
echo "Checking fixture files for patient data patterns..."
fd -e json -x cat {} 2>/dev/null | grep -i "dummy patient"
# Look for patient data patterns in test setup and spec files
echo "Checking test files for patient data patterns..."
rg -i "dummy patient" "cypress/"
# Check for any data setup or test data utilities
echo "Checking for test data setup files..."
fd -e ts -e js -x grep -l "patient.*data" {} "cypress/"
Length of output: 7513
cypress/support/index.ts (2)
17-18: LGTM! Improved method naming convention.
The renaming of submitButton to clickSubmitButton and addition of clickCancelButton follow a clear verb-noun convention that better describes the actions being performed. This improves code readability and maintainability.
17-18: Verify complete migration of old method calls.
Let's ensure all test files have been updated to use the new method names.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if there are any remaining old method calls by searching for the exact method invocations.
Migration to new button click methods appears complete
Based on the verification results:
- No instances of old
submitButton()method calls were found - No instances of old
cancelButton()method calls were found - The new
clickSubmitButton()method is widely used across 16 test files - The new
clickCancelButton()method is used in 4 test files
The migration appears to be complete with no remaining legacy method calls.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining usage of the old 'submitButton' method
# to ensure complete migration.
echo "Checking for any remaining usage of old 'submitButton' method..."
rg -l "submitButton\(" --type ts
echo "Verifying all test files use the new 'clickSubmitButton' method..."
rg -l "clickSubmitButton\(" --type ts
echo "Checking usage of new 'clickCancelButton' method..."
rg -l "clickCancelButton\(" --type ts
Length of output: 1443
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for actual method calls of 'submitButton' to ensure complete migration
echo "Checking for actual calls of old 'submitButton' method..."
rg "\.submitButton\(" --type ts -A 1
# Also check for any potential old cancel button methods
echo -e "\nChecking for any old cancel button method calls..."
rg "\.cancelButton\(" --type ts -A 1
Length of output: 325
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientBedManagement.cy.ts (1)
14-15: These changes seem unrelated to the PR's objective.
The changes to patient name constants from numeric to word format (e.g., "Dummy Patient 6" → "Dummy Patient Six") appear unrelated to the PR's main objective of fixing date input dropdown validation. Consider submitting these naming convention changes as a separate PR.
Let's check if this is part of a broader naming standardization effort:
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientDoctorConnect.cy.ts (1)
10-10: Verify test data consistency
The changes to user names might require corresponding updates in test data setup. Let's verify this:
Also applies to: 13-13
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that "Dummy Patient Eleven" is consistently used across multiple test files:
- cypress/e2e/sample_test_spec/SampleTestRequest.cy.ts
- cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientLogUpdate.cy.ts
- cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientDoctorConnect.cy.ts
And "Tester Doctor" is also referenced in PatientDoctorConnect.cy.ts.
Test data is consistent
The test data names are being used consistently across the test files. No updates are needed as the names match across the test suite.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to the old and new names in test data setup
echo "Searching for old names..."
rg "Dummy Patient 11|Dev Doctor Two" -t json -t ts
echo "Searching for new names..."
rg "Dummy Patient Eleven|Tester Doctor" -t json -t ts
echo "Checking fixture files..."
fd -e json -x cat {} \; | jq -c 'select(. | tostring | contains("Dummy Patient") or contains("Doctor"))'
Length of output: 65339
src/Integrations/Plausible.tsx (1)
13-21: Verify analytics initialization in development environments.
The validation helps prevent unintended analytics tracking, but we should ensure it works correctly across different environments.
✅ Verification successful
Analytics configuration is properly handled across environments
The validation is working as intended. The code in care.config.ts shows that Plausible analytics has proper fallback values for both server URL and domain, which are overridable through environment variables (REACT_PLAUSIBLE_SERVER_URL and REACT_PLAUSIBLE_SITE_DOMAIN). The error handling in the reviewed code will prevent analytics from running if these values are missing or invalid, which is the desired behavior for development environments.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential development environment configurations
rg -l "plausible.*development" .
rg -l "analytics.*development" .
# Check for environment-specific configuration files
fd -e json -e js -e ts "config|env" -x grep -l "plausible"
Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of care.config.ts to understand the configuration structure
cat care.config.ts
# Look for any environment-specific handling in Plausible.tsx
rg -A 5 -B 5 "process\.env|NODE_ENV" src/Integrations/Plausible.tsx
# Search for any test configurations
fd -e test.ts -e test.tsx -e spec.ts -e spec.tsx . -x grep -l "plausible"
Length of output: 3246
cypress/pageobject/Login/LoginPage.ts (1)
23-23: LGTM! Method name changes improve clarity.
The renaming from submitButton to clickSubmitButton makes the action more explicit and follows good testing practices.
Let's verify consistency across other test files:
Also applies to: 29-29
✅ Verification successful
Method renaming is consistently applied across the codebase
The verification shows that all instances of the submit button interaction are using the new clickSubmitButton method. There are no remaining occurrences of the old submitButton method, indicating the renaming has been consistently applied throughout the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of the old method name
# to ensure consistent renaming across all test files
# Search for any remaining instances of submitButton
echo "Checking for any remaining instances of submitButton..."
rg -g '*.{ts,js,tsx,jsx}' 'submitButton\(' cypress/
# Search for usage of the new method name for reference
echo "Checking usage of new method name clickSubmitButton..."
rg -g '*.{ts,js,tsx,jsx}' 'clickSubmitButton\(' cypress/
Length of output: 6887
cypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientFileupload.ts (3)
63-63: Verify consistent usage of clickSubmitButton across the codebase
The change from submitButton to clickSubmitButton appears to be part of a broader standardization effort. Let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across all test files.
Also applies to: 94-94
✅ Verification successful
The standardization to clickSubmitButton is consistently applied across the codebase
The verification shows that all submit button interactions in the TypeScript files are using the standardized clickSubmitButton method. There are no instances of the old submitButton pattern remaining in the codebase, confirming successful standardization.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining instances of the old submitButton method
rg "submitButton\(" --type ts
# Check usage pattern of the new clickSubmitButton method
rg "clickSubmitButton\(" --type ts
Length of output: 6603
23-25: Verify the reduced wait time impact on test stability
The wait time has been reduced from 5000ms to 2000ms. While reducing test execution time is good, ensure this doesn't impact test stability, especially for slower environments or when recording audio.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results and generate a final response.
Wait times for audio recording appear consistent with UI implementation
The search results show that the audio recording functionality is implemented in AudioCaptureDialog.tsx with clear UI states for starting and stopping recording. The 2000ms wait times in the test are reasonable because:
- The first wait allows for the audio recording dialog to fully initialize
- The second wait provides sufficient time for the recording to start
- The final 1000ms wait before saving is adequate for the recording to stop
The reduced wait times (from 5000ms to 2000ms) align well with the UI implementation, which shows immediate feedback through animation ("animate-pulse") and timer display. The timings should be stable across environments since they're waiting for UI elements that are immediately updated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other audio recording related tests and their wait times
rg -A 5 "record-audio|start-recording|stop-recording" --type ts
Length of output: 2695
23-25: Verify if these changes should be in a separate PR
The changes in this file (audio recording timing and button interaction standardization) appear unrelated to the PR's stated objective of "Disallow picking out of range month or year in date input dropdown". Consider moving these changes to a separate PR focused on test infrastructure improvements.
Also applies to: 63-63, 94-94
cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersHomepage.cy.ts (2)
20-20: Verify test data setup for the new username.
The username change from "devdoctor1" to "dev-doctor2" needs verification to ensure the test user exists and has the correct permissions in the test environment.
Line range hint 1-91: Verify the scope of changes in this PR.
These changes appear to be unrelated to the PR's main objective of "Disallow picking out of range month or year in date input dropdown". The pagination refactoring, while beneficial, seems to be a separate concern.
✅ Verification successful
Pagination changes appear to be part of a broader test refactoring
Based on the evidence found, this is actually a beneficial refactoring of the test suite where common pagination functionality has been extracted into a shared helper (paginationHelpers.ts). This helper is being used across multiple test files (assets, facility, patient, and users specs) to standardize pagination testing. While not directly related to date input validation, this kind of test refactoring improves maintainability and is a valid inclusion, especially if these changes were discovered during the process of implementing the date validation tests.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are other test files with similar pagination changes
# to determine the scope of this refactoring
echo "Searching for files with similar pagination changes..."
fd -e cy.ts -e cy.js | xargs rg -l "pageNavigation.*navigateToNextPage|userPage.*navigateToNextPage"
Length of output: 453
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the git history of these files to see if they are part of this PR
git diff --name-only origin/main... | grep -E "cypress/e2e/(users|patient|facility|assets).*\.cy\.(ts|js)"
# Also check the PR title and description to understand the scope
gh pr view --json title,body
Length of output: 386
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if these pagination changes are new additions or modifications
rg -B2 -A2 "pageNavigation.*navigateToNextPage" cypress/e2e/users_spec/UsersHomepage.cy.ts
# Also check for the existence of the pagination helper file
fd "paginationHelpers" --type f
Length of output: 350
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the pagination helper file to see if it's a new file
cat cypress/pageobject/utils/paginationHelpers.ts
# Also check if there are any other files importing this helper
rg -l "import.*paginationHelpers"
Length of output: 609
src/components/Facility/Consultations/LogUpdateAnalyseTable.tsx (1)
1-93: Verify integration with date input dropdown
While this component is well-implemented, we should verify its integration with the date input dropdown mentioned in the PR objectives.
cypress/e2e/hcx_spec/HcxClaims.cy.ts (2)
14-14: Verify consistent patient naming convention across test files
The change from numeric ("14") to text ("Thirteen") format suggests a standardization effort.
✅ Verification successful
Patient naming convention is consistently using text format across test files
The verification shows that all test files are consistently using the text format (e.g., "Three", "Four", "Thirteen") for patient names, and there are no instances of numeric format (e.g., "14"). The change from "Dummy Patient 14" to "Dummy Patient Thirteen" aligns with the established naming convention in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for inconsistent patient naming patterns across test files
# Expected: All test files should use the same format (either numeric or text)
echo "Searching for different patient naming patterns..."
rg -g "*.cy.ts" "Dummy Patient \d+" cypress/
rg -g "*.cy.ts" "Dummy Patient (One|Two|Three|Four|Five|Six|Seven|Eight|Nine|Ten|Eleven|Twelve|Thirteen|Fourteen|Fifteen)" cypress/
Length of output: 2275
51-51: Verify consistent button interaction method naming
The change from submitButton to clickSubmitButton improves clarity. Let's verify this naming pattern is consistently applied.
✅ Verification successful
Button interaction methods are consistently implemented
The codebase shows a clear and consistent pattern for button interactions:
- Custom commands are properly defined in
cypress/support/commands.tsusing the 'click' prefix:clickSubmitButtonandclickCancelButton - No instances of the old
submitButtonpattern were found - Other button interactions follow similar clear naming conventions (e.g.,
clicklinkedskillbutton,clickupdatedetailbutton)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old button interaction method names
# Expected: All button interactions should use the new 'click' prefix pattern
echo "Searching for old button interaction patterns..."
rg -g "*.cy.ts" "\.submitButton\(" cypress/
rg -g "*.ts" "submitButton.*=.*\(" cypress/support/
Length of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for both old and new button interaction patterns to understand the naming convention
# Search for any button-related commands in test files
echo "Searching for button interaction patterns in test files..."
rg -g "*.cy.ts" "button" cypress/
# Search for button-related command definitions in support files
echo "Searching for button command definitions in support files..."
rg -g "*.ts" "Cypress.Commands.add.*button" cypress/support/
Length of output: 9765
cypress/e2e/assets_spec/AssetHomepage.cy.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Good refactoring to use centralized pagination helper.
The import of pageNavigation aligns with the codebase's move towards using a shared pagination implementation.
Line range hint 1-84: Verify alignment with PR objectives.
The changes in this file focus on pagination test refactoring, which appears unrelated to the PR's stated objective of "Disallow picking out of range month or year in date input dropdown". Please clarify if these changes should be in a separate PR focused on pagination improvements.
Let's check for any related date input changes:
cypress/pageobject/Sample/SampleTestCreate.ts (1)
1-5: Verify custom command implementation
The verifyAndClickElement appears to be a custom Cypress command. Ensure it's properly defined in cypress/support/commands.ts.
✅ Verification successful
Custom command implementation is properly defined
The verifyAndClickElement custom command is correctly implemented in cypress/support/commands.ts. The command:
- Takes element selector and reference text as parameters
- Scrolls the element into view
- Verifies the element contains the reference text and is visible
- Performs the click action
The usage in SampleTestPage is consistent with the implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the custom command definition
rg -A 5 "Cypress.Commands.add\('verifyAndClickElement'"
Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the custom command definition with a broader pattern
rg -A 5 "verifyAndClickElement"
# Also search in commands.ts files specifically
fd "commands.ts" --exec rg -A 5 "verifyAndClickElement" {}
Length of output: 15562
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationDischarge.cy.ts (1)
34-34: Verify the necessity of double submission
The test shows two consecutive submit actions: "Confirm Discharge" followed by "Acknowledge & Submit". While this might reflect the actual UI flow, it would be helpful to:
- Add a comment explaining why two submissions are needed
- Consider adding assertions between the submissions to verify the intermediate state
patientPage.visitPatient("Discharge Patient One");
patientDischarge.clickDischarge();
patientDischarge.selectDischargeReason(patientDischargeReason4);
+// First submission confirms the discharge details
cy.clickSubmitButton("Confirm Discharge");
+// Verify intermediate confirmation dialog
+cy.get('.confirmation-dialog').should('be.visible');
+// Second submission acknowledges the discharge confirmation
cy.clickSubmitButton("Acknowledge & Submit");Also applies to: 37-38
package.json (1)
102-102: Verify the necessity of new dependencies for this PR.
The added dependencies (@julr/vite-plugin-validate-env and zod) appear to be for environment variable validation, which seems unrelated to the PR's objective of implementing date input dropdown validation. Please clarify if these dependencies are necessary for this PR or if they should be part of a separate PR focused on environment variable validation.
Let's check if these dependencies are used in the changes:
Also applies to: 150-150
cypress/support/commands.ts (1)
124-127: LGTM! Improved naming convention.
The renamed command clickSubmitButton better reflects its action and follows the verb-noun pattern. The implementation correctly ensures the button is in view before clicking.
cypress/pageobject/Patient/PatientCreation.ts (2)
60-61: LGTM! Consistent method naming in age selection flow.
The rename maintains consistency with the previous change. The sequence of selecting "Age" option and then confirming with the submit button is well structured.
26-26: LGTM! Improved method naming clarity.
The rename from submitButton to clickSubmitButton makes the action more explicit and follows Cypress's action-based naming conventions.
Let's verify the custom command implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the implementation of the custom command to ensure it's properly defined.
Custom command implementation verified and working as expected
The clickSubmitButton command is properly implemented in cypress/support/commands.ts. It:
- Takes an optional
buttonTextparameter (defaults to "Submit") - Finds submit buttons using proper selector
button[type='submit'] - Ensures visibility by scrolling into view
- Performs the click action
The usage in PatientCreation.ts with arguments "Select" and "Confirm" is correct and consistent with the implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the custom command implementation
# Look for the custom command definition in support files
# Search for clickSubmitButton command definition
rg -t ts "Cypress.Commands.add.*clickSubmitButton" cypress/support/
Length of output: 168
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the implementation of clickSubmitButton command
rg -A 5 "Cypress.Commands.add.*clickSubmitButton" cypress/support/commands.ts
Length of output: 363
src/components/Facility/TransferPatientDialog.tsx (1)
218-218: LGTM!
The addition of the onBlur handler is appropriate for triggering the validation logic when the input loses focus.
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityHomepage.cy.ts (3)
86-89: LGTM! Improved pagination verification.
The changes enhance readability and make the page number verification more explicit. The new approach using verifyCurrentPageNumber() is clearer than the previous URL-based verification.
155-155: Verify consistent button click command usage.
The change from submitButton to clickSubmitButton appears to be a standardization effort for button interactions.
Also applies to: 163-163
✅ Verification successful
All button click commands are consistently using clickSubmitButton
The verification shows that the old submitButton command is not used anywhere in the codebase, and all button interactions consistently use the new clickSubmitButton command. The command is properly defined in cypress/support/index.ts and used across multiple test files with various button texts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usages of the old submitButton command
# to ensure consistent usage of clickSubmitButton across the test suite.
echo "Checking for remaining submitButton usages..."
rg "submitButton\(" "cypress/"
echo "Checking for clickSubmitButton usages..."
rg "clickSubmitButton\(" "cypress/"
Length of output: 6793
2-2: Verify consistent pagination helper adoption across test files.
The change from AssetPagination class to pageNavigation utility appears to be part of a larger refactoring effort.
✅ Verification successful
Migration to pageNavigation utility is consistently implemented
The refactoring from AssetPagination class to pageNavigation utility has been consistently applied across all test files. Evidence shows:
- All test files (
AssetHomepage,FacilityLocation,FacilityHomepage,PatientHomepage,UsersHomepage) now use the newpageNavigationutility - The old
AssetPagination.tsfile still exists but has no active imports - The new
paginationHelpers.tsis properly located incypress/pageobject/utils/and exports the shared utility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usages of AssetPagination across test files
# to ensure complete migration to pageNavigation.
echo "Checking for remaining AssetPagination imports..."
rg "import.*AssetPagination" "cypress/"
echo "Checking for remaining AssetPagination instantiations..."
rg "new AssetPagination\(\)" "cypress/"
Length of output: 311
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search strategy to understand the pagination-related changes
echo "Checking for any files using pageNavigation..."
rg "pageNavigation" "cypress/"
echo "Checking for files in the potential old location..."
fd "AssetPagination.ts" "cypress/"
echo "Checking for the new pagination helper file..."
fd "paginationHelpers.ts" "cypress/"
# Check the content of the pagination helper if found
echo "Examining pagination helper implementation..."
rg -A 5 "export.*pageNavigation"
Length of output: 3282
src/components/Patient/SampleTestCard.tsx (1)
117-120: Verify consistent ID naming pattern across related components.
The ID naming follows a consistent pattern (sample-test-*). However, let's verify this pattern is used consistently across related components.
Also applies to: 131-134, 145-148
✅ Verification successful
ID naming patterns are mostly consistent with minor variations
The codebase shows two main ID naming patterns for sample/test related elements:
- Primary pattern
sample-test-*used consistently in SampleTestCard and SampleViewAdmin - Secondary pattern
sample-*used in a few cases (sample-type, sample-details-btn, sample-request-btn) - One outlier using underscore:
date_of_test
The variations are minimal and appear to be intentionally different based on their context, not inconsistencies. The sample-test-* pattern is correctly used in the reviewed code.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent ID naming patterns in related components
# Expected: All sample test related IDs should follow the 'sample-test-*' pattern
# Search for sample-test IDs in other components
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx' 'id=["'\'']sample-' --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'jsx:*.jsx'
# Search for potential inconsistent ID patterns related to samples
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx' 'id=["'\''](?!sample-)(test|sample)' --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'jsx:*.jsx'
Length of output: 1245
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's modify the second search to find any IDs containing 'test' or 'sample' without regex lookahead
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx' 'id=["'\''](test|sample)[^-]' --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'jsx:*.jsx'
# Also search for IDs with test/sample but different naming patterns
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx' 'id=["'\''].*(test|sample).*["'\'']' --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'jsx:*.jsx'
Length of output: 1193
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientHomepage.cy.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM!
Clean addition of the pageNavigation import, following consistent import ordering.
Line range hint 1-182: Consider adding test cases for date input dropdown validation.
Given that this PR focuses on preventing out-of-range month/year selections in date input dropdowns, consider adding specific test cases to verify:
- Attempting to select out-of-range months/years
- Validation messages for invalid selections
- Navigation button functionality when invalid selections are attempted
This would help ensure the new validation logic is properly tested.
Would you like me to help draft the additional test cases for the date input validation?
vite.config.mts (1)
1-13: LGTM! Clean import organization.
The new imports for environment validation are properly organized alongside existing imports.
src/components/Facility/CentralNursingStation.tsx (3)
24-24: LGTM: Responsive configuration using useBreakpoints
The implementation of responsive perPageLimit using useBreakpoints is well-structured:
- Default: 6 items
- 4xl breakpoint: 9 items
- 4k breakpoint: 24 items
Also applies to: 43-47
51-51: LGTM: Consistent pagination updates
The pagination logic has been updated to use the dynamic perPageLimit consistently across:
- Initial filter configuration
- Query parameters
- Pagination component
Also applies to: 58-59, 93-93
221-237: LGTM: Modern responsive grid using container queries
The grid implementation using CSS container queries (@container) is a good approach:
- Responsive grid-cols based on container width rather than viewport
- Proper overflow handling for grid items
- Efficient scaling from 1 to 6 columns based on available space
src/components/Facility/BedCapacity.tsx (1)
80-81: LGTM: Good optimization for handling edge case
The early return with proper state cleanup when all bed types are used is a good optimization that improves code clarity.
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientRegistration.cy.ts (2)
67-67: LGTM! Consistent test data update.
The patient transfer name has been updated consistently with the notification message.
246-246: LGTM! Good use of template literals.
Using template literals improves code maintainability by making string interpolation more readable.
src/components/Patient/SampleTest.tsx (3)
219-219: LGTM! Well-structured IDs for form fields
The added IDs follow consistent kebab-case naming and are descriptive, improving both accessibility and test automation capabilities.
Also applies to: 234-234
260-264: LGTM! Consistent ID naming for ICMR label field
The ID follows the established kebab-case pattern and properly identifies the required field.
341-345: LGTM! Well-structured submit button ID
The submit button ID follows the kebab-case convention and clearly identifies its purpose.
Let's verify the test coverage for this form:
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityLocation.cy.ts (2)
174-175: LGTM! Pagination methods updated correctly
The pagination method calls have been properly updated to use the new pageNavigation helper, maintaining the same functionality while aligning with the new approach.
196-203: LGTM! Submit button commands updated correctly
The submit button commands have been properly updated to use the new clickSubmitButton custom command, which better describes the action being performed.
Let's verify that all submit button commands have been updated consistently:
✅ Verification successful
Submit button commands have been successfully migrated
The search results confirm that all submit button interactions in the codebase are using the new clickSubmitButton command. There are no instances of the old submitButton format remaining, and the new command is consistently used across all test files with proper button text parameters.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old submitButton commands
# Expected: No matches for the old command format
rg -l "submitButton\(" cypress/
Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for both old and new button commands
# to ensure we have proper coverage
echo "Searching for old submitButton format:"
rg "submitButton\(" --type ts cypress/
echo -e "\nSearching for new clickSubmitButton format:"
rg "clickSubmitButton\(" --type ts cypress/
Length of output: 6811
cypress/pageobject/Facility/FacilityCreation.ts (2)
279-279: LGTM! Method name change improves clarity
The change from submitButton to clickSubmitButton better describes the action being performed, maintaining consistency with similar changes across the codebase.
305-307: LGTM! New method supports date validation requirements
The verifyErrorNotification method aligns with the PR objectives by providing a way to verify error messages when users attempt to select invalid dates in the dropdown.
src/components/Common/AvatarEditModal.tsx (1)
295-295: LGTM: Good defensive programming practice!
Adding the !selectedFile condition to the button's disabled state prevents attempting to save when no file is selected. This is a good defensive programming practice that ensures the component maintains a valid state.
src/components/Patient/SampleViewAdmin.tsx (2)
158-161: Good addition of test/accessibility identifiers!
The addition of id attributes improves both testability and accessibility. These identifiers will help with:
- E2E testing and automation
- Screen reader navigation
- Component identification for QA
Also applies to: 280-280, 357-357
Line range hint 1-411: Verify integration with date input changes
While this file contains accessibility improvements, it's not directly related to the PR's main objective of fixing date input validation. Let's verify the integration points:
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts (1)
320-351: Verify alignment with PR objectives.
The PR objectives mention "Disallow picking out of range month or year in date input dropdown", but these test cases focus on facility creation permissions. While these tests are valuable additions, they appear unrelated to the date input validation mentioned in the PR description. Please clarify if these changes should be part of a separate PR focused on access control improvements.
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientLogUpdate.cy.ts (2)
35-41: LGTM: Improved readability of patient identifiers
The change from numerical to word form (e.g., "Dummy Patient Nine" instead of "Dummy Patient 9") improves readability and maintainability of test data.
58-58: LGTM: Improved clarity in button interaction methods
The consistent renaming from cy.submitButton() to cy.clickSubmitButton() across all submit actions:
- Makes the action more explicit
- Follows verb-based naming conventions for UI interactions
- Maintains consistency throughout the test suite
Also applies to: 77-77, 111-111, 115-115, 123-123, 129-129, 146-146, 159-159, 169-169, 177-177, 180-180, 206-206, 209-209, 254-254, 266-266, 284-284, 310-310, 327-327, 339-339, 349-349
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientConsultationCreation.cy.ts (3)
315-315: LGTM: Method renaming is consistent
The renaming of submitButton to clickSubmitButton is applied consistently across these test cases.
Also applies to: 367-367, 373-373
94-94: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add test coverage for date range validation
While the method renaming to clickSubmitButton improves clarity, this test case should include validation for the new date input restrictions mentioned in PR #9030.
Consider adding these test cases:
- Verify that out-of-range months cannot be selected
- Verify that out-of-range years cannot be selected
- Verify that navigation buttons work correctly
Also, consider using a more readable date format with a helper function:
// Add to support/commands.ts
Cypress.Commands.add('formatDateTime', (date: Date) => {
return date.toISOString().replace(/[-:]/g, '').slice(0, 12);
});
// Usage in test
cy.formatDateTime(new Date('2024-02-22T12:30:00'))Also applies to: 98-98, 107-107
Line range hint 1-400: Test coverage gap for PR objectives
While the method renaming changes are consistent, the test file needs additional coverage specifically for the date input dropdown restrictions mentioned in PR #9030.
Run this script to verify current date-related test coverage:
src/components/Patient/SampleDetails.tsx (6)
334-334: LGTM! Addition of id attribute enhances accessibility
The addition of the id attribute to the patient name span improves component testability and accessibility.
365-365: LGTM! Consistent implementation of id attribute
The addition of the id attribute to the fast track reason span follows the same pattern as other changes, maintaining consistency across the component.
373-375: LGTM! Well-structured doctor name display
The addition of the id attribute and proper text formatting maintains good accessibility while ensuring consistent name display.
383-383: LGTM! Consistent implementation for diagnosis display
The addition of the id attribute maintains the established pattern and improves component accessibility.
391-391: LGTM! Proper implementation of differential diagnosis display
The addition of the id attribute follows the established pattern and maintains consistency across the component.
399-401: LGTM! Well-structured etiology display
The addition of the id attribute and proper formatting maintains consistency with other changes while improving accessibility.
src/components/Notifications/NotificationsList.tsx (2)
247-249: LGTM: Good defensive programming practice!
The addition of the service worker availability check prevents potential runtime errors by ensuring the required functionality is available before proceeding with subscription logic.
292-332: Verify security implications of push notification handling
While the implementation looks secure, it's important to verify:
- The security of the push notification endpoint storage
- The handling of subscription tokens
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the security implementation by checking the subscription key handling and validation.
Let me check one final aspect regarding the secure handling of the public key and subscription process.
Push notification implementation follows security best practices
The implementation demonstrates secure handling of push notifications with:
- Proper use of Web Push API with
applicationServerKeyfor VAPID authentication - Secure token management using
pushManager - Safe storage and cleanup of subscription credentials
- Appropriate error handling and state management
- Server-side key fetching instead of hardcoding
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential security issues in push notification handling
# Check for secure storage of push notification endpoints
rg -A 5 "pf_endpoint|pf_p256dh|pf_auth" --type ts
# Check for proper token validation
ast-grep --pattern 'subscription.getKey($_)'
Length of output: 2961
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check how subscription keys are handled
rg -A 10 "subscription.*getKey" --type ts
# Check for proper VAPID key validation
rg -A 5 "VAPID|applicationServerKey" --type ts
# Check for proper error handling in subscription
rg -A 5 "subscription.*error|subscription.*catch" --type ts
Length of output: 1095
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the source and handling of public key
rg -A 10 "public_key" --type ts
# Check subscription request implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'request($_, {
$$$
body: {
pf_endpoint: $_,
$$$
}
})'
Length of output: 3229
src/components/Facility/FacilityHome.tsx (1)
51-51: LGTM!
The import statement follows the project's import style conventions.
src/components/Patient/ManagePatients.tsx (3)
395-395: LGTM! Type safety improvement
The change from any to string | undefined enhances type safety for the badge value parameter.
424-424: LGTM! Type safety improvement
The change from any to string | undefined enhances type safety for the badge value parameter.
776-776: LGTM! Internationalization support added
Good improvement replacing the hardcoded string with the translation function.
src/components/Patient/PatientHome.tsx (1)
1298-1298: LGTM: Added ID for test automation.
The addition of the ID attribute "sample-request-btn" to the button component is appropriate for test automation purposes and follows good practices.
public/locale/en.json (2)
8-8: LGTM! Well-formatted status and medical terminology entries.
The new entries for approval status, SpO2 levels, and transportation follow the established conventions:
- Consistent uppercase key naming
- Proper capitalization of values
- Correct medical terminology
Also applies to: 144-144, 208-211, 214-214
918-918: LGTM! Well-formatted UI message.
The "no_patients_found" entry follows the established snake_case convention for UI messages and has proper capitalization.
src/components/Resource/ResourceList.tsx (1)
139-139: Ensure formatDateTime handles null or undefined values
If resource.modified_date is null or undefined, verify that formatDateTime handles it gracefully without throwing errors. This prevents potential runtime exceptions.
Run the following script to check how formatDateTime handles null or undefined values:
✅ Verification successful
Looking at the implementation of formatDateTime in src/Utils/utils.ts, we can see that it uses dayjs to handle date formatting and has proper null handling:
export const formatDateTime = (date: DateLike, format?: string) => {
const obj = dayjs(date);
if (format) {
return obj.format(format);
}
// If time is 00:00:00 of local timezone, format as date only
if (obj.isSame(obj.startOf("day"))) {
return obj.format(DATE_FORMAT);
}
return obj.format(DATE_TIME_FORMAT);
};The function is safe because:
dayjs(date)handles null/undefined gracefully by returning an invalid date object- The code in
ResourceList.tsxalready has a fallback with|| "--"when the date is invalid
No changes needed - formatDateTime already handles null/undefined values safely
The current implementation with the fallback || "--" is the correct pattern for handling potential null/undefined dates.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the implementation of formatDateTime to verify null handling.
# Test: Find the formatDateTime function definition.
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx -x gawk '/function formatDateTime/ { show=1 } show; /}/ { if (show) { show=0; exit } }' '{}'
# Check for null or undefined handling in the function.
Length of output: 123
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using ast-grep and ripgrep to find formatDateTime
# Search for formatDateTime function declaration using ast-grep
ast-grep --pattern 'function formatDateTime($_) { $$$ }'
# Search for formatDateTime arrow function declaration
ast-grep --pattern 'const formatDateTime = $_'
# Backup search using ripgrep for any occurrence of formatDateTime
rg "formatDateTime" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 111357
| navigateToNextPage() { | ||
| cy.get("button#next-pages").click(); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add button state validation before clicking.
The current implementation might be fragile in cases where the button is disabled or not immediately visible.
Consider this more robust implementation:
navigateToNextPage() {
- cy.get("button#next-pages").click();
+ cy.get("button#next-pages")
+ .should("be.visible")
+ .should("not.be.disabled")
+ .click();
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| navigateToNextPage() { | |
| cy.get("button#next-pages").click(); | |
| }, | |
| navigateToNextPage() { | |
| cy.get("button#next-pages") | |
| .should("be.visible") | |
| .should("not.be.disabled") | |
| .click(); | |
| }, |
| const LogUpdateAnalyseTable: React.FC<SharedSectionTableProps> = ({ | ||
| data, | ||
| rows, | ||
| choices = {}, | ||
| }) => { | ||
| const { t } = useTranslation(); | ||
|
|
||
| const dataValues = React.useMemo(() => Object.values(data), [data]); | ||
|
|
||
| const getDisplayValue = ( | ||
| value: string | boolean | null | undefined, | ||
| field?: string, | ||
| ): string => { | ||
| if (typeof value === "boolean") { | ||
| return t(value ? "yes" : "no"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (field && choices[field]) { | ||
| const choiceMap = choices[field]; | ||
| const choice = | ||
| typeof value === "string" || typeof value === "number" | ||
| ? choiceMap[value] | ||
| : undefined; | ||
| return choice ? t(`${field.toUpperCase()}__${choice}`) : "-"; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return typeof value === "string" ? value : "-"; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| return ( | ||
| <div className="m-2 w-full overflow-hidden overflow-x-auto rounded-lg border border-black shadow md:w-fit"> | ||
| <table className="border-collapse rounded-lg border bg-secondary-100"> | ||
| <thead className="sticky top-0 bg-white shadow"> | ||
| <tr> | ||
| <th className="sticky left-0 border-b-2 border-r-2 border-black bg-white"></th> | ||
| {Object.keys(data).map((date) => ( | ||
| <th | ||
| key={date} | ||
| className="w-40 border border-b-2 border-secondary-500 border-b-black p-1 text-sm font-semibold" | ||
| > | ||
| <p>{formatDate(date)}</p> | ||
| <p>{formatTime(date)}</p> | ||
| </th> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </tr> | ||
| </thead> | ||
| <tbody className="bg-secondary-200"> | ||
| {rows.map((row) => ( | ||
| <tr | ||
| key={row.field ?? row.title} | ||
| className={classNames( | ||
| row.title && "border-t-2 border-t-secondary-600", | ||
| )} | ||
| > | ||
| <th | ||
| className={classNames( | ||
| "sticky left-0 border border-r-2 border-secondary-500 border-r-black bg-white p-2", | ||
| row.subField ? "pl-4 font-medium" : "font-bold", | ||
| )} | ||
| > | ||
| {row.title ?? t(`LOG_UPDATE_FIELD_LABEL__${row.field!}`)} | ||
| </th> | ||
| {dataValues.map((obj, idx) => { | ||
| const value = row.field ? obj[row.field] : undefined; | ||
| return ( | ||
| <td | ||
| key={`${row.field}-${idx}`} | ||
| className="w-80 border border-l-2 border-secondary-500 bg-secondary-100 p-2 text-center font-medium" | ||
| > | ||
| {row.field ? getDisplayValue(value, row.field) : "-"} | ||
| </td> | ||
| ); | ||
| })} | ||
| </tr> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </tbody> | ||
| </table> | ||
| </div> | ||
| ); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and loading states
The component should handle edge cases more gracefully.
+interface SharedSectionTableProps {
+ data: Record<string, Record<string, string | boolean | null>>;
+ rows: Array<{ title?: string; field?: string; subField?: boolean }>;
+ choices?: Record<string, Record<string | number, string>>;
+ isLoading?: boolean;
+}
const LogUpdateAnalyseTable: React.FC<SharedSectionTableProps> = ({
data,
rows,
choices = {},
+ isLoading = false,
}) => {
const { t } = useTranslation();
const dataValues = React.useMemo(() => Object.values(data), [data]);
+ if (isLoading) {
+ return (
+ <div className="m-2 p-4 text-center">
+ {t('loading')}
+ </div>
+ );
+ }
+
+ if (!dataValues.length) {
+ return (
+ <div className="m-2 p-4 text-center">
+ {t('no_data_available')}
+ </div>
+ );
+ }Also, consider wrapping the component with an error boundary:
class LogUpdateTableErrorBoundary extends React.Component {
// Implementation of error boundary
}| const getDisplayValue = ( | ||
| value: string | boolean | null | undefined, | ||
| field?: string, | ||
| ): string => { | ||
| if (typeof value === "boolean") { | ||
| return t(value ? "yes" : "no"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (field && choices[field]) { | ||
| const choiceMap = choices[field]; | ||
| const choice = | ||
| typeof value === "string" || typeof value === "number" | ||
| ? choiceMap[value] | ||
| : undefined; | ||
| return choice ? t(`${field.toUpperCase()}__${choice}`) : "-"; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return typeof value === "string" ? value : "-"; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance getDisplayValue function robustness
The function could be improved for better error handling and maintainability.
const getDisplayValue = (
value: string | boolean | null | undefined,
field?: string,
): string => {
+ if (value === null || value === undefined) {
+ return "-";
+ }
+
if (typeof value === "boolean") {
return t(value ? "yes" : "no");
}
- if (field && choices[field]) {
+ if (field && field in choices) {
const choiceMap = choices[field];
- const choice =
- typeof value === "string" || typeof value === "number"
- ? choiceMap[value]
- : undefined;
- return choice ? t(`${field.toUpperCase()}__${choice}`) : "-";
+ if (typeof value === "string" || typeof value === "number") {
+ const choice = choiceMap[value];
+ if (choice) {
+ return t(`${field.toUpperCase()}__${choice}`);
+ }
+ }
+ return "-";
}
- return typeof value === "string" ? value : "-";
+ return String(value);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const getDisplayValue = ( | |
| value: string | boolean | null | undefined, | |
| field?: string, | |
| ): string => { | |
| if (typeof value === "boolean") { | |
| return t(value ? "yes" : "no"); | |
| } | |
| if (field && choices[field]) { | |
| const choiceMap = choices[field]; | |
| const choice = | |
| typeof value === "string" || typeof value === "number" | |
| ? choiceMap[value] | |
| : undefined; | |
| return choice ? t(`${field.toUpperCase()}__${choice}`) : "-"; | |
| } | |
| return typeof value === "string" ? value : "-"; | |
| }; | |
| const getDisplayValue = ( | |
| value: string | boolean | null | undefined, | |
| field?: string, | |
| ): string => { | |
| if (value === null || value === undefined) { | |
| return "-"; | |
| } | |
| if (typeof value === "boolean") { | |
| return t(value ? "yes" : "no"); | |
| } | |
| if (field && field in choices) { | |
| const choiceMap = choices[field]; | |
| if (typeof value === "string" || typeof value === "number") { | |
| const choice = choiceMap[value]; | |
| if (choice) { | |
| return t(`${field.toUpperCase()}__${choice}`); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return "-"; | |
| } | |
| return String(value); | |
| }; |
| return ( | ||
| <div className="m-2 w-full overflow-hidden overflow-x-auto rounded-lg border border-black shadow md:w-fit"> | ||
| <table className="border-collapse rounded-lg border bg-secondary-100"> | ||
| <thead className="sticky top-0 bg-white shadow"> | ||
| <tr> | ||
| <th className="sticky left-0 border-b-2 border-r-2 border-black bg-white"></th> | ||
| {Object.keys(data).map((date) => ( | ||
| <th | ||
| key={date} | ||
| className="w-40 border border-b-2 border-secondary-500 border-b-black p-1 text-sm font-semibold" | ||
| > | ||
| <p>{formatDate(date)}</p> | ||
| <p>{formatTime(date)}</p> | ||
| </th> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </tr> | ||
| </thead> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance table accessibility and semantics
The table structure should be more accessible and semantic.
return (
- <div className="m-2 w-full overflow-hidden overflow-x-auto rounded-lg border border-black shadow md:w-fit">
+ <div
+ className="m-2 w-full overflow-hidden overflow-x-auto rounded-lg border border-black shadow md:w-fit"
+ role="region"
+ aria-label={t('log_update_table_label')}
+ >
<table className="border-collapse rounded-lg border bg-secondary-100">
+ <caption className="sr-only">{t('log_update_table_caption')}</caption>
<thead className="sticky top-0 bg-white shadow">
<tr>
<th
+ scope="col"
className="sticky left-0 border-b-2 border-r-2 border-black bg-white">
</th>
{Object.keys(data).map((date) => (
<th
+ scope="col"
key={date}
className="w-40 border border-b-2 border-secondary-500 border-b-black p-1 text-sm font-semibold"
>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| cy.verifyAndClickElement("#edit-insurance-policy", "Edit Insurance Policy"); | ||
| cy.clickCancelButton(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered evidence, I can now provide the final response:
The edit-cancel sequence is likely redundant and should be removed
Looking at the implementation and flow:
- The code clicks "Edit Insurance Policy" but immediately cancels without making any changes
- It then proceeds to select an eligible policy using a different selector (#select-insurance-policy)
- The cancel action appears unnecessary as it's followed by the actual policy selection workflow
The edit-cancel sequence seems to serve no purpose in the test flow and could potentially make the test more brittle. Consider removing lines 83-84 since the actual policy selection is handled by selectEligiblePolicy().
🔗 Analysis chain
Clarify the purpose of the cancel action in the workflow
The test now verifies the "Edit Insurance Policy" element before clicking it, which improves reliability. However, the immediate clickCancelButton() call afterward needs clarification:
- Why is the edit action immediately canceled?
- Is this a required step in the business logic?
Let's check if this pattern exists in other similar workflows:
Let me gather more context about the workflow by checking the surrounding code:
Let me check the implementation of the selectEligiblePolicy method to understand the workflow better:
Let me try a different approach to find the implementation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar edit-then-cancel patterns in other test files
# Expected: Find similar patterns to understand if this is a common workflow
echo "Searching for similar edit-cancel patterns..."
rg -B 2 -A 2 "clickCancelButton" cypress/
Length of output: 1988
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the surrounding context of the edit-cancel pattern in HcxClaims.cy.ts
rg -B 10 -A 10 "edit-insurance-policy" cypress/e2e/hcx_spec/HcxClaims.cy.ts
Length of output: 913
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the implementation of selectEligiblePolicy method
ast-grep --pattern 'selectEligiblePolicy($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for selectEligiblePolicy implementation using ripgrep
rg -B 3 -A 5 "selectEligiblePolicy" cypress/
Length of output: 1349
| const showAllFacilityUsers = ["DistrictAdmin", "StateAdmin"]; | ||
| if ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Define user types as constants
Magic strings are used for user types, which could lead to maintenance issues and typos.
Consider defining user types as constants:
+const ADMIN_USER_TYPES = ["DistrictAdmin", "StateAdmin"] as const;
+type AdminUserType = typeof ADMIN_USER_TYPES[number];
-const showAllFacilityUsers = ["DistrictAdmin", "StateAdmin"];
+const showAllFacilityUsers = ADMIN_USER_TYPES;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const showAllFacilityUsers = ["DistrictAdmin", "StateAdmin"]; | |
| if ( | |
| const ADMIN_USER_TYPES = ["DistrictAdmin", "StateAdmin"] as const; | |
| type AdminUserType = typeof ADMIN_USER_TYPES[number]; | |
| const showAllFacilityUsers = ADMIN_USER_TYPES; | |
| if ( |
| if ( | ||
| authUser.user_type === "DistrictAdmin" && | ||
| authUser.district === facilityObject?.district | ||
| ) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| if ( | ||
| authUser.user_type === "StateAdmin" && | ||
| authUser.state === facilityObject?.state | ||
| ) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add null checks for facility object
The function assumes facilityObject is defined when checking district and state matches. This could lead to runtime errors.
Add null checks:
if (
authUser.user_type === "DistrictAdmin" &&
+ facilityObject?.district &&
authUser.district === facilityObject?.district
) {
return true;
}
if (
authUser.user_type === "StateAdmin" &&
+ facilityObject?.state &&
authUser.state === facilityObject?.state
) {
return true;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if ( | |
| authUser.user_type === "DistrictAdmin" && | |
| authUser.district === facilityObject?.district | |
| ) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if ( | |
| authUser.user_type === "StateAdmin" && | |
| authUser.state === facilityObject?.state | |
| ) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if ( | |
| authUser.user_type === "DistrictAdmin" && | |
| facilityObject?.district && | |
| authUser.district === facilityObject?.district | |
| ) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if ( | |
| authUser.user_type === "StateAdmin" && | |
| facilityObject?.state && | |
| authUser.state === facilityObject?.state | |
| ) { | |
| return true; | |
| } |
| const showAllFacilityUsers = ["DistrictAdmin", "StateAdmin"]; | ||
| if ( | ||
| !showAllFacilityUsers.includes(authUser.user_type) && | ||
| authUser.home_facility_object?.id === facilityId | ||
| ) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security: Review permission hierarchy for home facility users
The current implementation allows any user with matching home facility to bypass district/state level checks. This could potentially allow lower-level users to access functionality intended only for admins.
Consider adding user type checks before allowing home facility access:
-if (
- !showAllFacilityUsers.includes(authUser.user_type) &&
- authUser.home_facility_object?.id === facilityId
-) {
+const facilityLevelUsers = ["Doctor", "Staff", "Nurse"];
+if (
+ facilityLevelUsers.includes(authUser.user_type) &&
+ authUser.home_facility_object?.id === facilityId
+) {
return true;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const showAllFacilityUsers = ["DistrictAdmin", "StateAdmin"]; | |
| if ( | |
| !showAllFacilityUsers.includes(authUser.user_type) && | |
| authUser.home_facility_object?.id === facilityId | |
| ) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| const showAllFacilityUsers = ["DistrictAdmin", "StateAdmin"]; | |
| const facilityLevelUsers = ["Doctor", "Staff", "Nurse"]; | |
| if ( | |
| facilityLevelUsers.includes(authUser.user_type) && | |
| authUser.home_facility_object?.id === facilityId | |
| ) { | |
| return true; | |
| } |
| @@ -743,6 +751,7 @@ | |||
| "hi__record_not_fetched_title": "This record hasn't been fetched yet", | |||
| "hi__waiting_for_record": "Waiting for the Host HIP to send the record.", | |||
| "hide": "Hide", | |||
| "high": "High", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Inconsistent key casing for status indicators.
The keys "high", "low", and "resource_status" should follow the uppercase convention used for other status indicators in the file.
Apply this diff to maintain consistency:
- "high": "High",
+ "HIGH": "High",
- "low": "Low",
+ "LOW": "Low",
- "resource_status": "Resource Status",
+ "RESOURCE_STATUS": "Resource Status",Also applies to: 844-844, 1116-1116
| fieldsToDisplay = fieldsToDisplay.intersection( | ||
| new Set(NURSING_CARE_PROCEDURES), | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix usage of Set intersection - 'intersection' method is not standard
In JavaScript, the Set object does not have a built-in intersection method. This will result in a runtime error. To compute the intersection of two sets, consider using the filter method.
You can modify the code as follows:
- fieldsToDisplay = fieldsToDisplay.intersection(
- new Set(NURSING_CARE_PROCEDURES),
- );
+ fieldsToDisplay = new Set(
+ [...fieldsToDisplay].filter((procedure) =>
+ NURSING_CARE_PROCEDURES.includes(procedure),
+ ),
+ );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| fieldsToDisplay = fieldsToDisplay.intersection( | |
| new Set(NURSING_CARE_PROCEDURES), | |
| ); | |
| fieldsToDisplay = new Set( | |
| [...fieldsToDisplay].filter((procedure) => | |
| NURSING_CARE_PROCEDURES.includes(procedure), | |
| ), | |
| ); |
|
I want to close this PR because some conflicts have been araised. |
Proposed Changes:
Merge Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Improvements