Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[new release] domainslib (0.4.1) #20754

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 17, 2022
Merged

Conversation

Sudha247
Copy link
Contributor

This release fixes compatibility with OCaml 5.00.0+trunk in ocaml-multicore/domainslib#61. Breaks compatibility with older Multicore variants 4.12.0+domains and 4.12.0+domains+effects.

bug-reports: "https://github.com/ocaml-multicore/domainslib/issues"
tags: ["org:ocamllabs"]
depends: [
"dune" {>= "1.8"}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"dune" {>= "1.8"}
"ocaml" {>= "5"}
"dune" {>= "1.8"}

We need to make it explicit that it is incompatible with 4.12+domains

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't know if "5" is the right number there though

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I've followed the 5.00 convention used here https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/blob/master/packages/base-domains/base-domains.base/opam#L7. Might probably need an update later if the version numbering were to change.

@kit-ty-kate
Copy link
Member

Thanks a lot!

@kit-ty-kate kit-ty-kate merged commit bb9d375 into ocaml:master Feb 17, 2022
@kit-ty-kate
Copy link
Member

Could you return the fixes in the opam file upstream so that they can be taken into account for next time?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants