-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve fitting #293
Comments
peterfpeterson
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2020
peterfpeterson
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2020
The issue Jean is pointing out is specifically for the pseudo-Voigt. Gaussian is fine. |
A separate issue has been created for the pseudo-Voigt uncertainties #303 |
mantid PR27809 fixes the last bits of this issue. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Current peak fitting does not give terribly good results in the general case. Certain things can be done to make it better:
FitPeaks
to better set initial guesses for pseudo-Voigt. The issue is that it sets things using effective parameters and pseudo-Voigt needs the mixing parameter set first.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: