Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix assembly loading in symbol loader. #332

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2017
Merged

Fix assembly loading in symbol loader. #332

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2017

Conversation

codito
Copy link
Contributor

@codito codito commented Jan 12, 2017

Instead of attempting to load the test assembly, try to query for it. It should
have been already loaded by the test adapter.

In netcoreapp1.1, attempting to load the same executable within itself throws.

Instead of attempting to load the test assembly, try to query for it. It should
have been already loaded by the test adapter.

In netcoreapp1.1, attempting to load the same executable within itself throws.
@codito
Copy link
Contributor Author

codito commented Jan 12, 2017

@sbaid @Faizan2304 @singhsarab can you review please?

Validation scenarios:

  • Test the bug scenario on connect demo
  • Test xunit simple app
  • Try testplatform.sln

Copy link
Contributor

@singhsarab singhsarab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@Faizan2304 Faizan2304 merged commit afa5bb3 into microsoft:RC.3 Jan 13, 2017
codito added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2017
* Fix assembly loading in symbol loader. (#332)

Instead of attempting to load the test assembly, try to query for it. It should
have been already loaded by the test adapter.

In netcoreapp1.1, attempting to load the same executable within itself throws.

* Add error tracing for symbol parse failure.

* Fix platform tests for objectmodel.

* Fix debug type. Copy manifest file and comcomponents to output directory.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants