Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup OWNERS #354

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 13, 2023
Merged

Cleanup OWNERS #354

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 13, 2023

Conversation

ckadner
Copy link
Member

@ckadner ckadner commented Apr 12, 2023

Motivation

Currently, pull requests get auto-assigned reviewers (and approvers) by the @kserve-oss-bot
However, many of the reviewers and approvers are no longer active. When inactive reviewers are auto-assigned, then active contributors who could actually help with reviews are not notified about new PRs.

Similarly, the @kserve-oss-bot adds a message to PRs about who is allowed to approve PRs, which often points to inactive contributors.

Modifications

  • Following Kubernetes guidance, moving inactive approvers under emeritus_approvers, removing inactive contributors from list of reviewers
  • Adding currently active contributors to the list of reviewers
  • Removing reviewers who are no longer working on the project

Result

An updated OWNERS file. Auto-assigned reviewers are currently active.

Related PRs

- Add currently active contributors to the list of reviewers
- Remove reviewers who are no longer working on the project
- Move inactive approvers under emeritus_approvers
  https://www.kubernetes.dev/docs/guide/owners/#cleanup


Signed-off-by: Christian Kadner <ckadner@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Kadner <ckadner@us.ibm.com>
Copy link
Member

@njhill njhill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ckadner

@kserve-oss-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ckadner, njhill

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@njhill
Copy link
Member

njhill commented Apr 13, 2023

/lgtm

@kserve-oss-bot kserve-oss-bot merged commit e9d9366 into main Apr 13, 2023
kserve-oss-bot pushed a commit to kserve/modelmesh-runtime-adapter that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2023
#### Motivation

Currently, pull requests get auto-assigned `reviewers` (and `approvers`) by the @kserve-oss-bot
However, many of the reviewers and approvers are no longer active. When inactive reviewers are auto-assigned, then active contributors who could actually help with reviews are not notified about new PRs.

Similarly, the @kserve-oss-bot adds a message to PRs about who is allowed to approve PRs, which often points to inactive contributors.

#### Modifications

- Following [Kubernetes guidance](https://www.kubernetes.dev/docs/guide/owners/#cleanup), moving inactive `approvers` under `emeritus_approvers`, removing inactive contributors from list of `reviewers`
- Adding currently active contributors to the list of `reviewers`
- Removing `reviewers` who are no longer working on the project

#### Result

An updated OWNERS file. Auto-assigned reviewers are currently active.

#### Related PRs

- [ ] kserve/modelmesh#89
- [ ] #44
- [ ] kserve/modelmesh-serving#354

Signed-off-by: Christian Kadner <ckadner@us.ibm.com>
kserve-oss-bot pushed a commit to kserve/modelmesh that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2023
#### Motivation

Currently, pull requests get auto-assigned `reviewers` (and `approvers`) by the @kserve-oss-bot
However, many of the reviewers and approvers are no longer active. When inactive reviewers are auto-assigned, then active contributors who could actually help with reviews are not notified about new PRs.

Similarly, the @kserve-oss-bot adds a message to PRs about who is allowed to approve PRs, which often points to inactive contributors.

#### Modifications

- Following [Kubernetes guidance](https://www.kubernetes.dev/docs/guide/owners/#cleanup), moving inactive `approvers` under `emeritus_approvers`, removing inactive contributors from list of `reviewers`
- Adding currently active contributors to the list of `reviewers`
- Removing `reviewers` who are no longer working on the project

#### Result

An updated OWNERS file. Auto-assigned reviewers are currently active.

#### Related PRs

- [ ] #89
- [ ] kserve/modelmesh-runtime-adapter#44
- [ ] kserve/modelmesh-serving#354


Signed-off-by: Christian Kadner <ckadner@us.ibm.com>
@tjohnson31415 tjohnson31415 deleted the cleanup-owners branch April 25, 2023 21:13
Jooho added a commit to Jooho/modelmesh-serving that referenced this pull request May 5, 2023
Jooho pushed a commit to red-hat-data-services/modelmesh-runtime-adapter that referenced this pull request May 16, 2023
Currently, pull requests get auto-assigned `reviewers` (and `approvers`) by the @kserve-oss-bot
However, many of the reviewers and approvers are no longer active. When inactive reviewers are auto-assigned, then active contributors who could actually help with reviews are not notified about new PRs.

Similarly, the @kserve-oss-bot adds a message to PRs about who is allowed to approve PRs, which often points to inactive contributors.

- Following [Kubernetes guidance](https://www.kubernetes.dev/docs/guide/owners/#cleanup), moving inactive `approvers` under `emeritus_approvers`, removing inactive contributors from list of `reviewers`
- Adding currently active contributors to the list of `reviewers`
- Removing `reviewers` who are no longer working on the project

An updated OWNERS file. Auto-assigned reviewers are currently active.

- [ ] kserve/modelmesh#89
- [ ] kserve#44
- [ ] kserve/modelmesh-serving#354

Signed-off-by: Christian Kadner <ckadner@us.ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants