-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[JENKINS-66984] Pick up newer Guava from core #244
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Jesse
</dependencies> | ||
<dependencyManagement> | ||
<dependencies> | ||
<dependency> | ||
<groupId>io.jenkins.tools.bom</groupId> | ||
<artifactId>bom-2.249.x</artifactId> | ||
<artifactId>bom-2.249.x</artifactId> <!-- TODO weekly --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would it not be better to use 2.303
so at least you are closed to the core and pick up any other plugins that requrie the new Guava?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jenkinsci/bom#671 would be more appropriate for this purpose. I punted on it because #242 (comment) suggests that I would need to make a bigger patch.
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ public boolean perform(AbstractBuild<?, ?> build, Launcher launcher, BuildListen | |||
wc.getPage(b, "artifact/3/4/"); | |||
int httpCount = httpLogging.getRecords().size(); | |||
System.err.println("total count: " + httpCount); | |||
assertThat(httpCount, lessThanOrEqualTo(11)); | |||
assertThat(httpCount, lessThanOrEqualTo(13)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why does changing the core, change this number? any clues would be helpful in an inline comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Took me some bisecting, but see 19e3b48
|
@jglick can we get a new release on this? PCT fails on |
OK. It looks like jenkinsci/jenkins#5858 has been released, too, so I can try taking advantage of that next. |
JENKINS-66984
Downstream of jenkinsci/jenkins#5707.
#215 and #226 might need to wait for a Guice upgrade.
See e.g. #140 for motivation.