-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Better discord link #818
Better discord link #818
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
Line range hint
1-7
: Fix typo and consider using pure MarkdownThere's a typo in the HTML at the beginning of the file:
-<div style="postion: relative; width: 337px; height: 110px;"> +<div style="position: relative; width: 337px; height: 110px;">Also, consider if pure Markdown could achieve the same result as the current HTML + Markdown mix. This could improve readability and maintainability of the README.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
13-13
: LGTM! Consider minor improvements and verify the invite link.The updated Discord badge looks good and aligns with the PR objectives. The dynamic link now reflects the server's ID, which is an improvement over the static label.
Some suggestions for further enhancement:
- Consider adding alt text for accessibility, e.g.,
![Discord](https://img.shields...)
.- For easier maintenance, you could extract the Discord server ID to a variable if this README is generated from a template.
Please verify that the Discord invite link (https://discord.gg/N5sEpsuhh9) is correct and active. You can use the following script to check the link's validity:
✅ Verification successful
Please verify the final destination of the Discord invite link by following the redirect. You can use the following script to check the final status code:
Discord invite link verified as valid and active.
The Discord invite link (https://discord.gg/N5sEpsuhh9) has been successfully verified and is active, ensuring that the badge directs users correctly.
For further improvement:
- Consider adding alt text for accessibility, e.g.,
![Discord](https://img.shields.io/discord/939641163265232947?color=404eed&label=discord)
.- To enhance maintainability, extract the Discord server ID to a variable if the README is generated from a template.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the Discord invite link # Test: Check if the Discord invite link is valid response=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://discord.gg/N5sEpsuhh9) if [ $response -eq 200 ]; then echo "Discord invite link is valid" else echo "Discord invite link returned status code: $response" fiLength of output: 209
Script:
# Description: Follow redirects and verify the final status of the Discord invite link # Test: Check the final status code after following redirects response=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -L https://discord.gg/N5sEpsuhh9) if [ $response -eq 200 ]; then echo "Discord invite link is valid and active." else echo "Discord invite link returned final status code: $response" fiLength of output: 202
Before:
After: