Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(docs): Update issue links in SPEC.md #5190

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2022
Merged

Conversation

pierwill
Copy link
Contributor

@pierwill pierwill commented Sep 11, 2022

I've update the links to point to the issues in this repo.

A few have been closed; I've removed those links.

Checklist

Dear Author 👋, the following checks should be completed (or explicitly dismissed) before merging.

  • ✏️ Write a PR description, regardless of triviality, to include the value of this PR
  • 🔗 Reference related issues
  • 🏃 Test cases are included to exercise the new code
  • 🧪 If new packages are being introduced to stdlib, link to Working Group discussion notes and ensure it lands under experimental/
  • 📖 If language features are changing, ensure docs/Spec.md has been updated
    No changes to lang, but this does update SPEC.md.

Dear Reviewer(s) 👋, you are responsible (among others) for ensuring the completeness and quality of the above before approval.

I've update the links to point to the issues in this repo.

A few have been closed; I've removed those links.
@pierwill pierwill requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2022 18:01
@pierwill pierwill requested review from onelson and removed request for a team September 11, 2022 18:01
docs/SPEC.md Outdated
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ Examples:
2.71828
.26

[IMPL#254](https://github.com/influxdata/platform/issues/254) Parse float literals
<!-- [IMPL#254](https://github.com/influxdata/platform/issues/254) Parse float literals -->
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if there's utility in keeping this commented out. Should we not just remove it?

I wonder if this, and the others are commented out because no equivalent issue was filed in the current repo(s).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yes, lemme go back and review these!

@pierwill pierwill requested a review from onelson September 12, 2022 16:29
Copy link
Contributor

@onelson onelson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, looks great. Good to have that remark about "no corresponding issue." Now we can follow up as needed.

@pierwill pierwill merged commit d6d42c2 into master Sep 12, 2022
@pierwill pierwill deleted the pierwill/spec-links branch September 12, 2022 17:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants