Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Debug sfr_box diagnostic test #125679

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

emontnemery
Copy link
Contributor

@emontnemery emontnemery commented Sep 10, 2024

Proposed change

Debug sfr_box diagnostic test

The class added to sfr_box/__init__.py makes tests fail. Some extra checks added to sfr_box/conftest.py to narrow down the problem.

pytest -vvv tests/components/sfr_box/test_diagnostics.py

With this change, the test passes:

diff --git a/tests/components/sfr_box/__init__.py b/tests/components/sfr_box/__init__.py
index e4b86709536..cbc8ce5e17f 100644
--- a/tests/components/sfr_box/__init__.py
+++ b/tests/components/sfr_box/__init__.py
@@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ from typing import Optional, Union
 class StupidClass:
     """Blah."""

-    def __init__(self, connect_timeout: Optional[Union[int, float]]) -> None:  # noqa: UP007
-        """Blah."""
+    #def __init__(self, connect_timeout: Optional[Union[int, float]]) -> None:  # noqa: UP007
+    #    """Blah."""

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@home-assistant
Copy link

Hey there @epenet, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (sfr_box) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of sfr_box can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
  • @home-assistant unassign sfr_box Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

@joostlek
Copy link
Member

Fixed by hacf-fr/sfrbox-api#327

@joostlek joostlek closed this Sep 10, 2024
@emontnemery emontnemery reopened this Sep 10, 2024
@emontnemery
Copy link
Contributor Author

I want to understand how changing the typing fixes the problem instead of just closing the issue

@emontnemery
Copy link
Contributor Author

emontnemery commented Sep 10, 2024

The problem goes away if pydantic is downgraded from 1.10.17 to 1.10.16.

The diff is not large between those two releases, it seems to be mostly about shuffling 1.x-code around: pydantic/pydantic@v1.10.16...v1.10.17

Edit: Tests pass when removing the pydantic cython libraries

@epenet epenet mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2024
19 tasks
@emontnemery
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing, this is a known issue in pydantic: pydantic/pydantic#4519

@joostlek joostlek deleted the debug_sfr_box_diagnostic_test branch September 11, 2024 14:08
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 12, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants