-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update 50.discussion.md #600
Conversation
AppVeyor build 1.0.2278 for commit 3a97c2a failed. |
@tlukan do you have an ORCID? <orcid.org>
AppVeyor build 1.0.2281 for commit 5fc0306 is now complete. Found 11 potential spelling error(s). Preview:content/08.transmission.md:320:tlukancontent/50.discussion.md:89:Adhanom content/50.discussion.md:89:choropleth content/50.discussion.md:89:choropleth content/50.discussion.md:89:choropleth content/50.discussion.md:89:choropleths content/50.discussion.md:89:choropleths content/50.discussion.md:89:Ghebreyesus content/50.discussion.md:89:inconclusivity content/50.discussion.md:89:Tedros content/50.discussion.md:91:Americna... |
AppVeyor build 1.0.2291 for commit e1bd854 is now complete. Found 0 potential spelling error(s). Preview:... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tlukan I'm so sorry this took so long! I think you did an awesome job and raised the most important points for this section. I expanded a bit on your ideas to make the style match the sections above a bit more. I'd love to hear what you think!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add in figure references
AppVeyor build 1.0.2309 for commit b6e8b44 is now complete. Found 0 potential spelling error(s). Preview:... |
AppVeyor build 1.0.2314 for commit 350d7a9 is now complete. Found 0 potential spelling error(s). Preview:... |
AppVeyor build 1.0.2388 for commit 581905c is now complete. Found 0 potential spelling error(s). Preview:... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one suggestion, thanks @rando2
Co-authored-by: Anthony Gitter <agitter@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: RLordan <62627112+RLordan@users.noreply.github.com>
AppVeyor build 1.0.2400 Build execution time has reached the maximum allowed time for your plan (60 minutes). |
The AppVeyor build timed out, but I confirmed that Figure 6 now appears correctly in the GitHub Actions PDF artifact. I only reviewed the figure issues and didn't read the new text carefully. |
AppVeyor build 1.0.2432 for commit df38294 is now complete.... Found 0 potential spelling error(s). Preview:The rendered manuscript from this build is temporarily available for download at: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had a few thoughts - mostly there are some quite long paragraphs here that I think should be broken up a bit more. Feel free to merge it when you're ready.
content/50.discussion.md
Outdated
China, the United States, and France are among the countries with the most clinical trial recruiting for trials with single-country enrollment. | ||
Many countries have little to no clinical trial recruiting, with the continents of Africa and South America much less represented than Asia, Europe, and North America. | ||
Trials that recruit across multiple countries do appear to broaden geographic representation, but these trials seem to be heavily dominated by the United States and European Union. | ||
Dual concerns arise from this skewed geographic representation in clinical trial recruitment: first, it suggests that treatments such as remdesivir that are promising but primarily available to clinical trial participants are unlikely to be accessible by people in many countries, and second, it raises the concern that the findings of clinical trials will be based on participants from many of the wealthiest countries, which may lead to ambiguity in whether the findings can be extrapolated to COVID-19 patients elsewhere. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you think about breaking up this paragraph somewhere around here.
Co-authored-by: Casey Greene <cgreene@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Address @cgreene's concerns and add some more paragraph breaks! These did turn out to be gigantic paragraphs.
@agitter if you get a chance, would you be able to change your review (assuming this looks OK? I committed your suggestions!) |
AppVeyor build 1.0.2467 for commit 6372eae is now complete. Found 0 potential spelling error(s). Preview:... |
AppVeyor build 1.0.2474 Found 0 potential spelling error(s). Preview:for commit 9bf0b3c is now complete.... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The figure didn't show up after it was moved. I pushed a commit. Let's wait to check that preview build before merging.
AppVeyor build 1.0.2483 for commit 68eaec0 is now complete. Found 0 potential spelling error(s). Preview:... |
The figure appears correctly in this last build. |
[ci skip] This build is based on bfe3471. This commit was created by the following CI build and job: https://github.com/greenelab/covid19-review/commit/bfe3471b06e3ab63b1ef4010d55ff2cfdf311531/checks https://github.com/greenelab/covid19-review/runs/360593747
[ci skip] This build is based on bfe3471. This commit was created by the following CI build and job: https://github.com/greenelab/covid19-review/commit/bfe3471b06e3ab63b1ef4010d55ff2cfdf311531/checks https://github.com/greenelab/covid19-review/runs/360593747
Description of the proposed additions or changes
Related issues
closes #684
Suggested reviewers (optional)
Checklist