🩹 Fix: genericParseType parsing large uint leads to overflow

[ksw2000]

Description

genericParseType parsing a large uint leads to overflow. When parsing uint string, the bitSize of strconv.ParseUint should be 0 instead of 32.

Checklist

Before you submit your pull request, please make sure you meet these requirements:

• Followed the inspiration of the Express.js framework for new functionalities, making them similar in usage.
• Conducted a self-review of the code and provided comments for complex or critical parts.
• Updated the documentation in the /docs/ directory for Fiber's documentation.
• Added or updated unit tests to validate the effectiveness of the changes or new features.
• Ensured that new and existing unit tests pass locally with the changes.
• Verified that any new dependencies are essential and have been agreed upon by the maintainers/community.
• Aimed for optimal performance with minimal allocations in the new code.
• Provided benchmarks for the new code to analyze and improve upon.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request enhances the handling of the uint type in the parsing functionality. It introduces a new test case in the test suite to verify that the parser correctly converts the maximum uint value from its string representation. Additionally, the parser’s internal logic is modified to call genericParseUint with a dynamic bit size (0) rather than a fixed 32, ensuring it adapts better to various environments. These changes directly impact the genericParseType function's behavior when processing unsigned integers.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
ctx_test.go	Added a new test case in Test_GenericParseTypeUints to validate the parsing of the maximum uint value from its string representation.
helpers.go	Modified genericParseType for uint by updating the call to genericParseUint, now using a bit size of 0 instead of 32.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant T as Test_GenericParseTypeUints
    participant G as genericParseType
    participant U as genericParseUint
    T->>G: Call with (string representation of uint max value)
    G->>U: Invoke parsing with bit size parameter (0)
    U-->>G: Return parsed uint value
    G-->>T: Return uint value to test

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• 🩹 fix: make SetValWithStruct set zero values and support more types #3167 #3227: Addresses related changes in handling uint values within the SetValWithStruct function, indicating a direct code-level connection with the modifications in this PR.

Suggested reviewers

• gaby
• sixcolors
• ReneWerner87
• efectn

Poem

I'm a rabbit with a keen coder's eye,
Hopping through tests, making failures fly.
uints now parsed with nimble grace,
Maximum values in their proper place.
With each tweak and hop, our code leaps high!
🐰✨ Happy hops and brilliant bytes, oh my!

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6c24bb and 8e66376.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• ctx_test.go (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• ctx_test.go

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)

• GitHub Check: unit (1.23.x, macos-13)
• GitHub Check: unit (1.23.x, macos-latest)
• GitHub Check: unit (1.23.x, windows-latest)
• GitHub Check: repeated
• GitHub Check: Analyse
• GitHub Check: Compare

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.08%. Comparing base (b0bc32b) to head (8e66376).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3315      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.15%   84.08%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         116      116              
  Lines       11551    11551              
==========================================
- Hits         9721     9713       -8     
- Misses       1399     1405       +6     
- Partials      431      433       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	84.08% <100.00%> (-0.07%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

ctx_test.go (1)

5525-5528: LGTM! Consider using strconv.FormatUint for better performance

The test case for maximum uint value is well-designed and helps prevent regression of the overflow bug. However, fmt.Sprintf can be replaced with strconv.FormatUint for better performance.

-			str:   fmt.Sprintf("%d", ^uint(0)),
+			str:   strconv.FormatUint(uint64(^uint(0)), 10),

🧰 Tools

🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

5527-5527: fmt.Sprintf can be replaced with faster strconv.FormatUint

(perfsprint)

🪛 GitHub Check: lint

[failure] 5527-5527:
fmt.Sprintf can be replaced with faster strconv.FormatUint (perfsprint)

🪛 GitHub Actions: golangci-lint

[error] 5527-5527: fmt.Sprintf can be replaced with faster strconv.FormatUint (perfsprint)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b0bc32b and a6c24bb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• ctx_test.go (1 hunks)
• helpers.go (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

ctx_test.go

5527-5527: fmt.Sprintf can be replaced with faster strconv.FormatUint

(perfsprint)

🪛 GitHub Check: lint

ctx_test.go

[failure] 5527-5527:
fmt.Sprintf can be replaced with faster strconv.FormatUint (perfsprint)

🪛 GitHub Actions: golangci-lint

ctx_test.go

[error] 5527-5527: fmt.Sprintf can be replaced with faster strconv.FormatUint (perfsprint)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)

• GitHub Check: unit (1.23.x, macos-13)
• GitHub Check: unit (1.23.x, macos-latest)
• GitHub Check: unit (1.23.x, windows-latest)
• GitHub Check: unit (1.23.x, ubuntu-latest)
• GitHub Check: Compare
• GitHub Check: repeated
• GitHub Check: Analyse

🔇 Additional comments (1)

helpers.go (1)

799-799: LGTM! Good fix for the uint overflow issue.

Changing the bit size from 32 to 0 is the correct solution. This allows strconv.ParseUint to use the platform's native uint size (32 bits on 32-bit systems, 64 bits on 64-bit systems), preventing overflow when parsing large uint values.