Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create local.md #44

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

JeffreySarnoff
Copy link

No description provided.

@JeffreySarnoff
Copy link
Author

unused

@JeffreySarnoff JeffreySarnoff deleted the patch-1 branch June 15, 2020 23:32
nstester pushed a commit to nstester/gcc that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2023
…-int (PR target/112413)

On m68k the compiler assumes that the PC-relative jump-via-jump-table
instruction and the jump table are adjacent with no padding in between.

When -mlong-jump-table-offsets is combined with -malign-int, a 2-byte
nop may be inserted before the jump table, causing the jump to add the
fetched offset to the wrong PC base and thus jump to the wrong address.

Fixed by referencing the jump table via its label. On the test case
in the PR the object code change is (the moveal at 16 is the nop):

    a:  6536            bcss 42 <f+0x42>
    c:  e588            lsll #2,%d0
    e:  203b 0808       movel %pc@(18 <f+0x18>,%d0:l),%d0
-  12:  4efb 0802       jmp %pc@(16 <f+0x16>,%d0:l)
+  12:  4efb 0804       jmp %pc@(18 <f+0x18>,%d0:l)
   16:  284c            moveal %a4,%a4
   18:  0000 0020       orib gcc-mirror#32,%d0
   1c:  0000 002c       orib gcc-mirror#44,%d0

Bootstrapped and tested on m68k-linux-gnu, no regressions.

Note: I don't have commit rights to I would need assistance applying this.

	PR target/112413
gcc/

	* config/m68k/linux.h (ASM_RETURN_CASE_JUMP): For
	TARGET_LONG_JUMP_TABLE_OFFSETS, reference the jump table
	via its label.
	* config/m68k/m68kelf.h (ASM_RETURN_CASE_JUMP): Likewise.
	* config/m68k/netbsd-elf.h (ASM_RETURN_CASE_JUMP): Likewise.
NinaRanns pushed a commit to NinaRanns/gcc that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
…t-on-template-types

c++, contracts do not require const keyword on template param
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant