Replies: 4 comments
-
I agree it would be easier if these were discussed as subgroups. What would be the best forum for this? Call, discussions, grouping issues, etc.? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Can we also include categorical / ordinal types as its own group? Right now they're implemented as constraints / extensions on other types, but I think deserve first-class discussion. (relevant issue: #844) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
In my opinion, the most pressing issue for v2 is
fields:
-name: value
type: number
We get into an undefined state when we need to export data into e.g. SQL because |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
See also this comparison of SQL data types. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The Table Schema tag lists several issues related to data types. These might better be discussed together. Subgroups may be:
date and times
datetime
withformat=default
support optional timezone offsets? #830numeric types
number.nanValues
,number.infValues
#644, Add decimal place constraint to number fields #641, bareNumber to interpret -$1000 as -1000 #609, SupportgroupChar
forinteger
type #498units
compound types
json
field type andjsonSchema
constraint support #640table
#410wkt
to field types #772, New propertycrs
#812 (may be related to units)Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions