Volume Purchasing Program (VPP): Edit teams modal #26166
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Update copy to accurately describe Fleet's current behavior: - App's are deleted - These app's policies are not deleted More context in a GitHub comment here:
This was referenced Feb 7, 2025
Closed
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #26166 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 63.63% 63.63%
=======================================
Files 1631 1631
Lines 156363 156363
Branches 4045 4096 +51
=======================================
Hits 99494 99494
Misses 49026 49026
Partials 7843 7843
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
jahzielv
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
More context in a GitHub comment here: #21827 (comment)