Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: cli: renew --only-cc with sectorfile #9402

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2022
Merged

Conversation

rjan90
Copy link
Contributor

@rjan90 rjan90 commented Sep 30, 2022

Related Issues

During testing of the v1.17.2-rc1/2 it was uncovered that the --only-cc option does not apply when specifying sectors with a sector-file.

Proposed Changes

Add the ability to extend/renew only CC-sectors with the --only-cc when using a sector-file.

Additional Info

Checklist

Before you mark the PR ready for review, please make sure that:

  • All commits have a clear commit message.
  • The PR title is in the form of of <PR type>: <area>: <change being made>
    • example: fix: mempool: Introduce a cache for valid signatures
    • PR type: fix, feat, INTERFACE BREAKING CHANGE, CONSENSUS BREAKING, build, chore, ci, docs,perf, refactor, revert, style, test
    • area: api, chain, state, vm, data transfer, market, mempool, message, block production, multisig, networking, paychan, proving, sealing, wallet, deps
  • This PR has tests for new functionality or change in behaviour
  • If new user-facing features are introduced, clear usage guidelines and / or documentation updates should be included in https://lotus.filecoin.io or Discussion Tutorials.
  • CI is green

Add the ability to extend/renew only CC-sectors with the `--only-cc` when using a sector-file.
@rjan90 rjan90 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 30, 2022 08:43
@magik6k magik6k merged commit 6246cf5 into master Sep 30, 2022
@magik6k magik6k deleted the fix/sector-file-only-cc branch September 30, 2022 10:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants