Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(integration): cron_tick to use implicit executions to avoid sender checks #1506

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2024

Conversation

rvagg
Copy link
Member

@rvagg rvagg commented Jan 19, 2024

When running in fvm the sender is checked for non-implicit executions, which matters when running these in fvm-workbench.

This has already been done to most integration tests, and cron_tick does a full execute-and-check, which is more than some of these tests are currently doing.

@rvagg rvagg changed the title fix: cron_tick to use implicit executions to avoid sender checks fix(integration): cron_tick to use implicit executions to avoid sender checks Jan 19, 2024
@Stebalien
Copy link
Member

(I'll let someone who knows more about how this might conflict merge this)

@anorth
Copy link
Member

anorth commented Jan 23, 2024

Please wait for #1313 , then this will be great

@Stebalien
Copy link
Member

This can be merged after a rebase.

when running in fvm the sender is checked for non-implicit executions,
which matters when running these in fvm-workbench
@rvagg rvagg force-pushed the rvagg/integration_cron_tick branch from ee6999d to a4a573b Compare February 10, 2024 01:25
@rvagg rvagg enabled auto-merge February 10, 2024 01:29
@rvagg rvagg added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 45db5e2 Feb 10, 2024
14 checks passed
@rvagg rvagg deleted the rvagg/integration_cron_tick branch February 10, 2024 01:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: ☑️ Done (Archive)
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants