-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
deps/mobile: Bump bazel
-> 6.3.1, rules_java
-> 6.4.0, io_bazel_rules_kotlin
-> 1.8
#28854
Conversation
CC @envoyproxy/dependency-shepherds: Your approval is needed for changes made to |
not sure if this will work and whether bazelbuild/rules_java#64 is resolved - but essentially trying to unblock bazel upgrade |
c4b26b8
to
a70e1f2
Compare
rules_java
-> 6.4.0bazel
-> 6.3.1, rules_java
-> 6.4.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Assuming this passes CI, LGTM. WOO HOO!!!
/retest mobile transients |
bazel
-> 6.3.1, rules_java
-> 6.4.0bazel
-> 6.3.1, rules_java
-> 6.4.0, io_bazel_rules_kotlin
-> 1.8
/retest |
11d31ae
to
f51393d
Compare
/retest mobile |
/retest |
f26f430
to
1854103
Compare
strip_prefix = "rules_java-6.4.0", | ||
url = "https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_java/archive/6.4.0.tar.gz", | ||
patch_args = ["-p1"], | ||
patches = ["@envoy//bazel:rules_java.patch"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we have a TODO for when we can drop this patch?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i can add - when is that ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure, i guess when that linked issue is fixed, or bazelbuild/bazel#17085
@keith unfortunately its still failing mobile CI - we are now down to issues related to the rules_java upgade - any help resolving these would be much appreciated! |
1854103
to
920f1f5
Compare
920f1f5
to
f72b133
Compare
Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io>
f72b133
to
2923310
Compare
…rules_kotlin` -> 1.8 (envoyproxy#28854) Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io> Co-authored-by: Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com>
…rules_kotlin` -> 1.8 (envoyproxy#28854) Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io> Co-authored-by: Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com> Signed-off-by: phlax <phlax@users.noreply.github.com>
…o_bazel_rules_kotlin` -> 1.8 (envoyproxy#28854)" This reverts commit b9d9a74. Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io>
…o_bazel_rules_kotlin` -> 1.8 (envoyproxy#28854)" This reverts commit b9d9a74. Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io>
….4.0, `io_bazel_rules_kotlin` -> 1.8 (envoyproxy#28854)"" This reverts commit c7147a8. Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io>
…o_bazel_rules_kotlin` -> 1.8 (envoyproxy#28854)" This reverts commit b9d9a74.
…rules_kotlin` -> 1.8 (#28854) Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io> Co-authored-by: Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com>
…rules_kotlin` -> 1.8 (#28854) Signed-off-by: Ryan Northey <ryan@synca.io> Co-authored-by: Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com> Signed-off-by: phlax <phlax@users.noreply.github.com>
Commit Message:
Additional Description:
Risk Level:
Testing:
Docs Changes:
Release Notes:
Platform Specific Features:
[Optional Runtime guard:]
[Optional Fixes #Issue]
[Optional Fixes commit #PR or SHA]
[Optional Deprecated:]
[Optional API Considerations:]