-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Cases] Case action: Phase 2 #169229
[Cases] Case action: Phase 2 #169229
Conversation
…o register_case_action
…o register_case_action
Pinging @elastic/response-ops (Team:ResponseOps) |
Pinging @elastic/response-ops-cases (Feature:Cases) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code looks good 👍 just few questions to understand the feature.
I am assuming that we will be able to test it locally when the feature branch is ready, right?
|
||
type Optional<T, K extends keyof T> = Pick<Partial<T>, K> & Omit<T, K>; | ||
|
||
interface OracleKeyAllRequired { | ||
ruleId: string; | ||
spaceId: string; | ||
owner: string; | ||
grouping: Record<string, string>; | ||
grouping: Record<string, unknown>; | ||
} | ||
|
||
type OracleKeyWithOptionalKey = Optional<OracleKeyAllRequired, 'ruleId'>; | ||
type OracleKeyWithOptionalGrouping = Optional<OracleKeyAllRequired, 'grouping'>; | ||
|
||
export type OracleKey = ExclusiveUnion<OracleKeyWithOptionalKey, OracleKeyWithOptionalGrouping>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why don't we use io-ts
here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What kind of usage do you have in mind?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I saw ExclusiveUnion
here and thought maybe we can use io-ts
here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
io-ts
is usually suited for runtime validation of data. In this case, it is not needed because we control the data.
x-pack/plugins/cases/server/connectors/cases/cases_connector.test.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/** | ||
* TODO: Add grouping info to | ||
*/ | ||
return { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what about the required custom fields?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great point. I need to think about it. We need the default value
feature. I will put a TODO
comment to not forget about it.
Thanks @js-jankisalvi! Yes, we are waiting for the System actions PR to get merged to be able to test the case action. |
💔 Build FailedFailed CI StepsTest Failures
Metrics [docs]
History
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: cc @cnasikas |
## Summary Depends on: #166267, #170326, #169484, #173740, #173763, #178068, #178307, #178600, #180437 PRs: - #168370 - #169229 - #171754 - #172709 - #173012 - #175107 - #175452 - #175505 - #177033 - #178277 - #177139 - #179796 Fixes: #153837 ## Testing Run Kibana with `--run-examples` if you want to use the "Always firing" rule. Create a rule with a case action in observability and the stack. The security solution is not supported. You should not be able to assign a case action in a security solution rule. 1. Test the "Reopen closed cases" configuration. 2. Test the "Grouping by" configuration. Only one field is allowed. Not all fields are persisted in alerts. If you select a field not part of the alert the case action will create a case where the grouping value is set to `unknow`. 3. Test the "Time window" feature. You can comment out the validation to test for shorter times. 4. Verify that the case action is experimental. 5. Verify that based on the rule type the case is created in the correct solution. 6. Verify that you cannot create a rule with the case action on the basic license. 7. Verify that the execution of the case action fails if you do not have permission for cases. Pending work on the system actions framework level to not allow users to create rules with system actions where they do not have permission. 8. Stress test the case action by creating multiple rules. ### Checklist Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR. - [x] [Documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-documentation.html) was added for features that require explanation or tutorials - [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios ### For maintainers - [x] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process) ## Release notes Automatically create cases when an alert is triggered. --------- Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: adcoelho <antonio.coelho@elastic.co> Co-authored-by: Janki Salvi <117571355+js-jankisalvi@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
This PR is a continuation of the work for the Case action. This PR implements the basic logic of the case connector. Specifically:
Not in this PR:
Depends on: #168370, #169484
Checklist
Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.
For maintainers