feat: rename VerifyingKey to PublicKey #202
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves a comprehensive renaming and type replacement of Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
crates/keys/src/signing_keys.rs (1)
11-11: LGTM! Consistent rename in signing key implementationThe changes correctly update both the import statement and the method return type.
Consider renaming the
verifying_key()method topublic_key()to maintain consistency with the new type name. This would make the API more intuitive:- pub fn verifying_key(&self) -> PublicKey { + pub fn public_key(&self) -> PublicKey { self.clone().into() }Also applies to: 41-41
crates/keys/src/verifying_keys.rs (3)
Line range hint
28-34: Enhance the enum documentation.While the renaming to
PublicKeyimproves clarity, consider expanding the documentation to include:
- The purpose and usage of each variant
- The specific use cases for each algorithm
- Links to relevant cryptographic standards
Example documentation:
/// Represents a public key used for digital signature verification. /// /// # Variants /// /// * `Secp256k1` - Used in Bitcoin and Ethereum networks, following the secp256k1 curve standard /// * `Ed25519` - Used in Cosmos, OpenSSH, and GnuPG, known for its performance and security /// * `Secp256r1` - Used in TLS, X.509 PKI, and Passkeys, following the NIST P-256 curve standard
Line range hint
56-138: Improve error messages in DER format methods.Consider providing more descriptive error messages for DER format operations:
- PublicKey::Ed25519(_) => bail!("Ed25519 vk to DER format is not implemented"), - PublicKey::Secp256k1(_) => bail!("Secp256k1 vk to DER format is not implemented"), + PublicKey::Ed25519(_) => bail!("DER format conversion is not supported for Ed25519 public keys"), + PublicKey::Secp256k1(_) => bail!("DER format conversion is not supported for Secp256k1 public keys"),
Line range hint
204-243: Update documentation to reflect the new type name.The documentation still refers to
VerifyingKeyinstead ofPublicKey:- /// Attempts to create a `VerifyingKey` from a base64-encoded string. + /// Attempts to create a `PublicKey` from a base64-encoded string. - /// * `Ok(VerifyingKey)` if the conversion was successful. + /// * `Ok(PublicKey)` if the conversion was successful.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
crates/cli/src/main.rs(3 hunks)crates/common/src/account.rs(4 hunks)crates/common/src/operation.rs(5 hunks)crates/common/src/transaction.rs(2 hunks)crates/common/src/transaction_builder.rs(6 hunks)crates/da/src/lib.rs(2 hunks)crates/keys/src/signing_keys.rs(2 hunks)crates/keys/src/tests.rs(7 hunks)crates/keys/src/verifying_keys.rs(8 hunks)crates/node_types/lightclient/src/lightclient.rs(3 hunks)crates/node_types/prover/src/prover/mod.rs(2 hunks)crates/node_types/prover/src/prover/tests.rs(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
crates/common/src/transaction.rs (1)
3-3: LGTM! Consistent rename from VerifyingKey to PublicKeyThe changes correctly update both the import statement and the struct field while maintaining the original functionality.
Also applies to: 22-22
crates/da/src/lib.rs (1)
4-4: LGTM! Consistent rename in signature verification logicThe changes correctly update both the import statement and the verify_signature method signature while preserving the original functionality.
Also applies to: 34-34
crates/common/src/operation.rs (1)
6-6: LGTM! Comprehensive rename across all key-related componentsThe changes consistently update all occurrences of VerifyingKey to PublicKey across:
- Imports
- Operation enum variants
- SignatureBundle struct
- ServiceChallenge enum
- get_public_key method
The functionality remains unchanged while improving naming consistency.
Also applies to: 18-18, 24-24, 33-33, 35-35, 42-42, 56-56, 66-66
crates/node_types/lightclient/src/lightclient.rs (1)
5-5: LGTM! Type replacement is consistent.The changes correctly update the type from
VerifyingKeytoPublicKeywhile maintaining the same behavior and error handling.Also applies to: 15-15, 26-26
crates/common/src/account.rs (2)
2-2: LGTM! Type replacement is consistent.The changes correctly update all occurrences of
VerifyingKeytoPublicKeyin struct definitions and method signatures.Also applies to: 12-12, 26-26, 45-45
Line range hint
134-137: Verify the field access syntax.Please verify that
data_signature.verifying_keyis still the correct field name after the type change toPublicKey. Some codebases prefer to usepublic_keyfor consistency with the type name.✅ Verification successful
Field name
verifying_keyis correct and consistent with codebase patternsThe field name
verifying_keyis consistently used throughout the codebase when referring to public keys in signature verification contexts, even with thePublicKeytype. This naming convention appears intentional to be more semantically precise about the key's purpose.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for field access patterns to verify consistency rg -A 2 "verifying_key" rg -A 2 "public_key"Length of output: 19055
crates/keys/src/tests.rs (1)
3-3: LGTM! Test coverage maintained.The test cases have been correctly updated to use
PublicKeywhile maintaining the same test scenarios and assertions. This ensures that the type change doesn't affect the behavior of the cryptographic operations.Also applies to: 13-13, 21-21, 29-29, 42-42, 129-129, 133-133, 142-142, 146-146, 155-155, 159-159, 171-171
crates/cli/src/main.rs (1)
7-7: LGTM! CLI commands updated correctly.The changes correctly update the type usage in both LightClient and FullNode commands while maintaining proper error handling.
Also applies to: 44-47, 139-141
crates/keys/src/verifying_keys.rs (2)
37-54: LGTM! Well-structured Hash implementation.The implementation correctly ensures unique hashes for each variant by prefixing with a unique byte.
Line range hint
141-203: LGTM! Clean and idiomatic conversion implementations.The conversion implementations are well-structured and follow Rust's type conversion best practices.
crates/node_types/prover/src/prover/tests.rs (1)
94-94: LGTM! Correct type update in test code.The variable type has been correctly updated to use
PublicKeyinstead ofVerifyingKey.crates/common/src/transaction_builder.rs (1)
101-101: LGTM! Consistent type updates across the TransactionBuilder.The changes correctly update all relevant method signatures and variable declarations to use
PublicKeyinstead ofVerifyingKey, maintaining consistency throughout the codebase.Also applies to: 209-209, 221-221, 239-239, 251-251
crates/node_types/prover/src/prover/mod.rs (1)
5-5: LGTM! Correct type updates in Prover configuration.The changes correctly update both the import statement and the
Configstruct field to usePublicKeyinstead ofVerifyingKey.Also applies to: 46-46
Ref #195
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
VerifyingKeywithPublicKeyacross multiple modules and componentsTests
PublicKeytype